PART II., QUESTION I.
CHAPTER XIOf the Method by which they can Inflict Every Sort of Infirmity,
generally Ills of the Graver Kind.
But there is no bodily infirmity,
not even leprosy or epilepsy, which cannot be caused by witches, with God's
permission. And this is proved by the fact that no sort of infirmity is
excepted by the Doctors. For a careful consideration of what has already been
written concerning the power of devils and the wickedness of witches will show
that this statement offers no difficulty. Nider also deals with this subject
both in his Book of Precepts and in his Formicarius, where he
asks: Whether witches can actually injure men by their witchcraft. And the
question makes no exception of any infirmity, however incurable. And he there
answers that they can do so, and proceeds to ask in what way and by what means.
And as to the first, he answers, as
has been shown in the First Question of the First Part of this treatise. And
it is proved also by S. Isidore where he describes the operations of witches (Etym.
8, cap. 9), and says that they are called witches on account of the magnitude
of their crimes; for they disturb the elements by raising up storms with the
help of devils, they confuse the minds of men in the ways already mentioned,
by either entirely obstructing or gravely impeding the use of their reason. He
adds also that without the use of any poison, but by the mere virulence of
their incantations, they can deprive men of their lives.
It is proved also by S. Thomas in
the Second Book of Sentences, dist. 7 and 8, and in Book IV, dist. 34,
and in general all the Theologians write that witches can with the help of the
devil bring harm upon men and their affairs in all the ways in which the devil
alone can injure or deceive, namely, in their affairs, their reputation, their
body, their reason, and their life; which means that those injuries which are
caused by the devil without any witch, can also be caused by a witch; and even
more readily so, on account of the greater offence which is given to the
Divine Majesty, as has been shown above.
In Job i and ii is found a
clear case of the injury in temporal affairs. The injury to reputation is
shown in the history of the Blessed Jerome, that the devil transformed himself
into the appearance of S. Silvanus, Bishop of Nazareth, a friend of S. Jerome.
And this devil approached a noble woman by night in her bed and began first to
provoke and entice her with lewd words, and then invited her to perform the
sinful act. And when she called out, the devil in the form of the saintly
Bishop hid under the woman's bed, and being sought for and found there, he in
lickerish language declared lyingly that he was the Bishop Silvanus. On the
morrow therefore, when the devil had disappeared, the holy man was
scandalously defamed; but his good name was cleared when the devil confessed
at the tomb of S. Jerome that he had done this in an assumed body.
The injury to the body is shown in
the case of the Blessed Job, who was stricken by the devil with terrible sores,
which are explained as a form of leprosy. And Sigisbert and Vincent of
Beauvais (Spec. Hist. XXV, 37) both tell that in the time of the
Emperor Louis II, in the diocese of Mainz, a certain devil began to thrown
stones and to beat at the houses as if with a hammer. And then by public
statements, and secret insinuations, he spread discord ad troubled the minds
of many. Then he excited the anger of all against one man, whose lodging,
where he was resting, he set on fire, and said that they were all suffering
for his sins. So at last that man had to find his lodging in the fields. And
when the priests were saying a litany on this account, the devil stoned many
of the people with stones till he hurt them to bleeding; and sometimes he
would desist, and sometimes rage; and this continued for three years, until
all the houses there were burned down.
Exampled of the injury to the use
of the reason, and of the tormenting of the inner perceptions, are seen in
those possessed and frenzied men of whom the Gospels tell. And as for death,
and that they deprive some of their lives, it is proved in Tobias vi,
in the case of the seven husbands of the virgin Sara, who were killed because
of their lecherous lust and unbridled desired for the virgin Sara, of whom
they were not worthy to be the husbands. Therefore it is concluded that both
by themselves, and all the more with the help of witches, devils can injure
men in every way without exception.
But if it is asked whether injuries
of this sort are to be ascribed rather to devils than to witches, it is
answered that, when the devils cause injuries by their own direct action, then
they are principally to be ascribed to them. But when they work through the
agency of witches for the disparagement and offending of God and the perdition
of souls, knowing that by this means God is made more angry and allows them
greater power of doing evil; and because they do indeed perpetuate countless
witchcrafts which the devil would not be allowed to bring upon men if he
wished to injure men alone by himself, but are permitted, in the just and
hidden purpose of God, through the agency of witches, on account of their
perfidy and abjuration of the Catholic Faith; therefore such injuries are
justly ascribed to witches secondarily, however much the devil may be the
principal actor.
Therefore when a woman dips a twig
in water and sprinkles the water in the air to make it rain, although she does
not herself cause the rain, and could not be blamed on that account, yet,
because she has entered into a pact with the devil by which she can do this as
a witch, although it is the devil who causes the rain, she herself
nevertheless deservedly bears the blame, because she is an infidel and does
the devil's work, surrendering herself to his service.
So also when a witch makes a waxen
image or some such thing in order to bewitch somebody; or when an image of
someone appears by pouring molten lead into water, and some injury is done
upon the image, such as piercing it or hurting it in any other way, when it is
the bewitched man who is in imagination being hurt; although the injury is
actually done to the image by some witch or some other man, and the devil in
the same manner invisibly injures the bewitched man, yet it is deservedly
ascribed to the witch. For, without her, God would never allow the devil to
inflict the injury, nor would the devil on his own account try to injure the
man.
But because it has been said that
in the matter of their good name the devils can injure men on the own account
and without the co-operation of witches, there may arise a doubt whether the
devils cannot also defame honest women so that they are reputed to be witches,
when they appear in their likeness to bewitch someone; from which it would
happen that such a woman would be defamed without cause.
In answering this we must premise a
few remarks. First, it has been said that the devil can do nothing without the
Divine permission, as is shown in the First Part of this work in the last
Question. It has also been shown that God does not allow so great power of
evil against the just and those who live in grace, as against sinners; and as
the devils have more power against sinners (see the text: When a strong man
armed, etc.) so they are permitted by God to afflict them more than the just.
Finally, although they can, with God's permission, injure the just in their
affairs, their reputation, and their bodily health, yet, because they know
that this power is granted them chiefly for the increase of the merits of the
just, they are the less eager to injure them.
Therefore it can be said that in
this difficulty there are several points to be considered. First, the Divine
permission. Secondly, the man who is thought to be righteous, for they who are
so reputed are not always actually in a state of grace. Thirdly, the crime of
which an innocent man would be suspected; for that crime in its very origin
exceeds all the crimes of the world. Therefore it is to be said that it is
granted that, with God's permission, an innocent person, whether or not he is
in a state of grace, may be injured in his affairs to this particular crime
and the gravity of the accusation (for we have often quoted S. Isidore's
saying that they are called witches from the magnitude of their crimes), it
can be said that for an innocent person to be defamed by the devil in a way
that has been suggested does not seem at all possible, for many reasons.
In the first place, it is one thing
to be defamed in respect of vices which are committed without any expressed or
tacit contract with the devil, such as theft, robbery, or fornication; but
quite another matter to be defamed in respect of vices which it is impossible
to accuse a man of having perpetrated unless he has entered upon an expressed
contract with the devil; and such are the works of witches, which cannot be
laid at their door unless it is by the power of devils that they bewitch men,
animals and the fruits of the earth. Therefore, although the devil can blacken
men's reputations in respect of other vices, yet it does not seem possible for
him to do so in respect of this vice which cannot be perpetrated without his
co-operation.
Besides, it has never hitherto been
known to have happened that an innocent person has been defamed by the devil
to such an extent that he was condemned to death for this particular crime.
Furthermore, when a person is only under suspicion, he suffers no punishment
except that which the Canon prescribes for his purgation, as will be shown in
the Third Part of this work in the second method of sentencing witches.
And it is set down there that, if
such a man fails in his purgation, he is to be considered guilty, but that he
should be solemnly adjured before the punishment due to his sin is proceeded
with and enforced. But here we are dealing with actual events; and it has
never yet been known that an innocent person has been punished on suspicion of
witchcraft, and there is no doubt that God will never permit such a thing to
happen.
Besides, He does not suffer the
innocent who are under Angelic protection to be suspected of smaller crimes,
such as robbery and such things; then all the more will He preserve those who
are under that protection from suspicion of the crime of witchcraft.
And it is no valid objection to
quote the legend of S. Germanius, when devils assumed the bodies of other
women and sat down at table and slept with the husbands, deluding the latter
into the belief that those women were in their own bodies eating and drinking
with them, as we have mentioned before. For the women in this case are not to
be held guiltless. For in the Canon (Episcopi 26. q. 2) such women are
condemned for thinking that they are really and actually transported, when
they are so only in imagination; although, as we have shown above, they are at
times bodily transported by devils.
But our present proposition is that
they can, with God's permission, cause all other infirmities, with no
exception; and it is to be concluded from what we have said that this is so.
For no exception is made by the Doctors, and there is no reason why there
should be any, since, as we have often said, the natural power of devils is
superior to all corporeal power. And we have found in our experience that this
is true. For although greater difficulty may be felt in believing that witches
are able to cause leprosy or epilepsy, since these diseases arise from some
long-standing physical predisposition or defect, none the less it has
sometimes been found that even these have been caused by witchcraft. For in
the diocese of Basel, in the district of Alsace and Lorraine, a certain honest
labourer spoke roughly to a certain quarrelsome woman, and she angrily
threatened him that she would soon avenge herself on him. He took little
notice of her; but on the same night he felt a pustule grow upon his neck, and
he rubbed it a little, and found his whole face and neck puffed up and swollen,
and a horrible form of leprosy appeared all over his body. He immediately went
to his friends for advice, and told them of the woman's threat, and said that
he would stake his life on the suspicion that this had been done to him by the
magic art of that same witch. In short, the woman was taken, questioned, and
confessed her crimes. But when the judge asked her particularly about the
reason for it, and how she had done it, she answered: “When that man used
abusive words to me, I was angry and went home; and my familiar began to ask
the reason for my ill humour. I told him, and begged him to avenge me on the
man. And he asked what I wanted him to do to him; and I answered that I wished
he would always have a swollen face. And the devil went away and afflicted the
man even beyond my asking; for I had not hoped that he would infect him with
such sore leprosy.” And so the woman was burned.
And in the diocese of Constance,
between Breisach and Freiburg, there is a leprous woman (unless she has paid
the debt of all flesh within these two years) who used to tell to many people
how the same thing had happened to her by reason of a similar quarrel which
took place between her and another woman. For one night when she went out of
the house to do something in front of the door, a warm wind came from the
house of the other woman, which was opposite, and suddenly struck her face;
and from that time she had been afflicted with the leprosy which she now
suffered.
And lastly, in the same diocese, in
the territory of the Black Forest, a witch was being lifted by a gaoler on to
the pile of wood prepared for her burning, and she said: ”I will pay you”;
and blew into his face. And he was at once afflicted with a horrible leprosy
all over his body, and did not survive many days. For the sake of brevity, the
fearful crimes of this witch, and many more instances could be recounted, are
omitted. For we have often found that certain people have been visited with
epilepsy or the falling sickness by means of eggs which have been buried with
dead bodies, especially the dead bodies of witches, together with other
ceremonies of which we cannot speak, particularly when these eggs have been
given to a person either in food or drink.