Da Secrecy News

 http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html

 

   CIA COVERT ACTION IN ITALY

 

    Covert action involving clandestine U.S. government support of Italian

 democratic parties during the 1960s was documented for the first time

 in the latest volume of the State Department's Foreign Relations of the

 United States (FRUS) series, released on April 21.

 

   The covert action program was predicated on the idea that with sufficient

 financial support, "the democratic parties' appeal in the next national

 election should increase and that of the Communist Party should

 decrease," according to a 1965 National Security Council document.

 

   The newly disclosed documents on the covert action in Italy

 are available here:

 

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/italy.html

 

   The complete FRUS volume in which the documents appeared (FRUS,

 1964-1968, vol. XII, Western Europe) is posted here:

 

    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/johnsonlb/xii/

 

   The covert action in Italy is one of a rather small number of U.S. covert

   actions that have now been officially acknowledged.  But these are only a

   fraction of the number that were actually carried out during the cold war.

   There were no fewer than 163 covert actions approved during the Kennedy

   administration alone, according to the State Department, and 142 covert

   actions during the Johnson administration through February 1967.

 

   See the "Note on U.S. Covert Action Programs" prepared by the

 FRUS editors here:

 

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/advisory/state/covert.html

 

   Characteristically, the CIA resisted declassification of the records on

 covert action in Italy.  Approval of their release had to be sought from the

 so-called High-Level Panel, composed of representatives from State, CIA

 and NSC.  This was the first issue ever brought before the High-Level Panel

 (in 1998) and it authorized disclosure of the newly published records.  In a

 regrettable concession to CIA budget secrecy policy, however, the dollar

 figures associated with the Italy operation were excised.

 

   In a sign that dissatisfaction with CIA disclosure policy is spreading

 beyond the community of historians and advocates, the CIA's reluctance to

 declassify old records was blasted in an opinion column that appeared last

 week in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

 

   "Pardon the American people for caring, but foreign affairs isn't some

 abstract thing that impacts only uptight men in expensive suits who work

 inside the Beltway," wrote Star-Telegram editorial writer J.R. Labbe.

 

   "[DCI George J.] Tenet and his minions in the spook world appear to be

 arguing that this material should remain secret forever. `Forever.' That's a

 long time and is unjustifiable under the Constitution, a document that they

 themselves swore to protect," Labbe wrote.

 

   There is of course no specific constitutional requirement to declassify

 historical records.  But the CIA is in direct violation of the U.S.

 Constitution when it withholds historical budget information since there

 is a specific constitutional requirement to publish an account of all

 expenditures "from time to time."  The CIA's casual defiance of this

 provision diminishes the power of the Constitution and is genuinely

 subversive of American democracy.

 

   See "CIA must stop sitting on historical briefings " by J.R. Labbe

 in the April 26 Fort Worth Star-Telegram:

 

    http://www.star-telegram.com/columnist/labbe2.htm