AF Nikkor ED 80-200 mm f/2.8 D
| Lens construction: | 16 elements in 11 groups |
| Focus distance: | 1.5 m to infinity |
| Angle of View: | 30° 10' - 12° 20' |
| Max. reproduction ratio: | 1:5.9 |
| Aperture scale: | f/2.8 to f/22 |
| Attachment size: | 77 mm |
| Diaphgram blades: | 9 |
| Lens hood: | HB-7 |
| Dimensions: | 87 mm (dia.) x 195 mm (length) |
| Weight: | 1300 g |
In 1988 Nikon introduced the AF 80-200/2.8, a telephoto zoom addressed to professionals. The first two versions (AF and AF-D, 1992) of this lens lacked a tripod collar and were a one-touch design. The <New> AF-D model (1997) is a two-ring zoom and has the tripod collar. All models have the same optical scheme (16 elements in 11 groups), with three ED-glass elements to reduce chromatic aberration and colour fringing.
I have owned all the 80-200 Nikkors (with the exception of the AF-S f/2.8) and this one is the best, definitely. The old f/4.5 was a surprisingly good performer but did you never try to use a polarizer with that lens? The brightness in the viewfinder dramatically decreases. As a matter of fact, a polarizer cuts about 2.5 stops and this means that the f/4.5 becomes a f/11 lens. The 80-200/4 was an excellent lens, being both distorsion and vignetting very well corrected. It was 1/3 stop faster than its legendary predecessor. Even wide open, sharpness was very good, particularly at the near focus limit (1.2 m).
In my opinion, the AF 80-200/2.8 resembles the excellent performance of the f/4 model, but with the following differences:
1) you can shoot at f/2.8 (it's obvious, but it's important!);
2) it's sharper at infinity and softer at the near focus limit;
3) at the long end of the zooming range the f/2.8 suffers some corner light fall-off, which disappears at f/5.6;
4) at 200 mm, the f/2.8 exhibits a slightly higher pincushion distorsion.
I swapped my one-ring AF 80-200/2.8 D for the new two-ring model. Therefore, I have extensively used both the AF-D versions and I could not detect (by my 8X loupe) any visible difference, in terms of sharpness, distorsion, vignetting and color rendition, between the two lenses.
![]() |
The Apennines (Italy)
Gran
Sasso d'Italia (Italy) ![]()
Smoke
+ fog = Smog (Rome,
Italy)![]()
All images © Copyright Riccardo Polini