33. Wordtime 

THE WORD IN NATURE

On the previous side, and we dealt with the question of the life on more sides already. We do not wish to refer to our big predecessors because we entered for totally different roads in the course of the research of the origin of the life. The kind reader may have experienced it already, (who was left this far in the reading entirely), what the examination of all phenomena we selected other roads. From not rebelling, but setting out from our traditions. We indicated that we are creation party, but we do not make it with the usual clerical stiffness, but with the logical interpretation of our old traditions.

In all of the universe only continuously variable, increasing, selfcopyed, and on a surprising manner reasonable something yes. Word. Like this, long í-vel. I looked up onto the number as I wrote this down. The 33. this a god's number. :-)

The world religions all claim similar one about the creation, and it does not make changes in this logically, if this is made on a different language. The life and the substance may not have originated from a static thing, drawn one like this never existed. Neither then, neither our days. (Only in the heads). All ancient religions write Word effluence down, but himself the ancestor existing, and only the skimpybrain people_nation made anthropomorphic gods of these. It was created for themselves a pantheon of gods onto their own picture and their resemblance. We this already three thousand of his years we smiled at it at the Greeks. The question seeming to be the paradoxical one so it, that the god may be anthropomorphic now then? (To a man like) a yes, the god may be anthropomorphic. But then may create an anthropomorphic god like this? Yes, may create. The man may create, not only the god. We then well the god? Creature. Than the man. On all of them what we see, the part of the creation. Everything. From Jesus it is preached often, that incarnate Word. From the man or a cactus not anymore very much say this, it would be unadorned truth though. Only for the mood of the completeness summon for a witness the original texts.

If additional Bible I would have dug out delivering me up, some so much would have sounded some other way. In the English Word primér on a manner word meaning, and reports scripture incidentally only. This is Wort in the German text. Word is near to the original one, because World reports a world though. The word and the world rather related, and if we think it over, that the world at us reports light though... (ignite világot= light) (in Hungarian the világ = world, and light) this though the upper right (yellowish) we may find it in a detail. Writes it clearly here the saint book, that god was Word. This is similar in all translations. But what is it, that there was a life in him, and the life was the people_nation light?

The god is not similar to a man if the life is in him being, but something which cannot be imagined huge thing. Even if there is a life on the Earth only. Because it is all of them he's in?

But if so big, then why we do not see it?

We see it of course! You are stupid and you were not listening!! Where is the god if all from Word was? Well everywhere. On all of them what you see only; Word. You are a word, Word, Wort some other way. The incarnate word not somebody else, than the substance. This was identified with Jesus totally correctly of course (Isa) because a special space source stayed in him, his soul. A divine one is a space source. There are light and a space source in everybody, but there is a totally different one in him. He is because he is between us now. In a body. He the system principal, who is superior to everybody and everything, but in an inhuman sense, but because of that, a god dared. This gives his power above the things, and not sword, or nuclear bombs. It is from him. All. Not some human bone blood kneaded together and from meat mash, but from Word. He Word first. Existed before, and because of this the originated from him timesystems his lord.

Is there an anti-life then?

Yeah, sure! You represent it. It is the strange sculpture on top of the sheet. You may see it on the Szeged cathedral. The world is with double polarity. There are antimatter, anti-light, and anti-edge. It wrong, only all image. They destroy each other mutually with the substance. For each other destructive. Than the wind woman the Huns Holy Arvisura, what is not other than the anti-space. If somebody there mistakes by, all of his substances are destroyed. Finally. It is an other creation.

An aromatic hydrocarbon looks so well the tunnel altogether a little needle represents the optics in a dog in our microscope. Is sweeping very near above a some kind of examined substance, and is on some volts of tenseness meanwhile the scanning needle. A sensitive electronics intensifies that minute current fluctuation, that than a brush discharge is heading towards the substance. The atoms get out from the theoretical plane slightly, than some projecting humps. We may turn these minute current fluctuations into a picture, which shows the atoms really. Here sure into ringed chains they show getting organized, and it appears here, that the carbon atoms do not settle down in a plane in the molecules. I mean there are atoms really in the substance, only the impartibility criterion one it was done in haste slightly. The atoms are not indivisible. They consist of additional components, and then these divisible.

The outermost surface of the atoms shows on this only here it on a simulated colour picture, it what we called electron shells yet recently. It shows that these show a quite character surface, i mean their quite fair border yes. This here a liquid condition substance, and shows, that nicely in a row, crystal-like regularly your director their molecules. Our transmitting substance already much more complicated, since a hundred, million consists of atom.

For this beautiful figure only that trouble of his, that right. 99,9 of the percentages of the transmitting substances known by us leftish, as it is material our particles, of what they consist. On the above microscopic picture even somewhat bigger ones the atoms, than on this DNA on a figure. I mean the illusion that we should catch sight of the atoms came true once already. I tinkered around with experiments like this before with ten years already. I did not have 25000 dollars though onto the gismo, but I took a good look at it in KFKI, and I did much better one, and one with a much plainer construction. From some 25 dollars. :-)

The sky is whitewashed sagaciously, not with lime. Single cast-off Suprafon piezo-s record-player pick-upal we set to it. This was the scanner. We used it translated only. Boogies the diverting signs. The two crystals were too fast for our then computer even so. This a commodore was 64. It did the diversion it gives-t too. I would not sing praises of the dismolition now. 200x200 dot. In two colours. This it is disparaged today, though TEM showed before picture 210x200 consists of a pixel. from this yet quite informative.

These older DNA figures, but good, they curl onto drawn left. This only a very little section our transmitting substance. On the left-wing figure the bird's eye view picture of this molecule purchasable seen, and here strikes a decimal symmetry. The thought-provoking one it, that for what the living beings do not look so, than a spring? From this morphology it would be possible to assert some similar nonsense yet even. If would twist, would be like that then than one awfully long ladder. How on earth a man, a kangaroo will be made of a so springlike lousy one, you are a geranium? What defines it, and what keeps the life in a formal system?

I put the right picture onto a head for the mood of the joke. The leftish procession leftish procession is left over then. Only in the examination of the processions with completeness inexperienced it is believed, that the other one saw a pole afar with a left-hand thread his end the right nut can be screwed onto it then. This sure impossible A above DNA exists, only in the opposite world. The substance is right there. The kirality not reversible and commutative the substances of the life. Very interesting, that the image molecule of the smell substance of the garlic was synthetize, but it was totally odourless. Our nose being smelling cells it is not noticed. They may not have met one like this in the nature. The molecule was image only of course, and no his atoms. There is a so important curiosity even in the world of the atoms because there are living and lifeless atoms. More punctually they living persons, onto only an other to life fractal rank. Four staffs are from these.

Is telling tales about this this figure of ours with an ancient origin, which found a refuge in our folk art opposite the activity of the strengths charging all of them slowly. This sign has a much more universal meaning, than we could believe it. Not only reports this creation where we live, but the other one three. This quadruple rift they are incarnated in the person of the four head cherubim in the Christian sphere of thought. Gabri El, Mikha El, Uri-he lives, Rafa El. From who they dismantled two is the four cherub of the saint crown.

Four of the main branches of the creation

This structure shows on this embroidery, and I put the purple ornament above the figure in order that I show it, that our days have the thought. This a prefabricated ornament one in my website maker. The essence of the universe, the light seed appear in this. Likewise, than on the middle of this folk embroidery. For this a lot he has something to do with the biology because this life and everything are the starting points of a life phenomenon. The Huns' god lives and his name means a life already. Because he is the truth and the road of the life. (Ego sum via veritas et debate)

But what the road? We talk about a road of two kinds. One the dusty, muddy or asphalt road, on which we move,, but reports the motion himself, shift, the orbit, along which we move away from our place. But reports a process, a particularly path of life, which lasts from the birth to the death,. I mean the road means a life, career. The above figure the tree of the life, which it signals, that a diverse, totally different flower grows go ahead. This is because this is not a strange plant, but himself the life. Who embroidered it knew the nature much better, than their obtuse critics. Important the left lower, raspberry-like figure, because we may find the same one the Sumerian on clay tablets. The Hungarian themselves remained in ethnography motive treasure shows many related features with the motives of ancient Egypt and Mezopotámia.

The man DNA considered as the fundamental life carrier and RNS do not resemble the morphological appearance of molecules, but then how the form is defined though the in him character organic matters. The same amino acids are in the plants, animals and the people_nation, and you are very distinct from the cabbage after all from the briar.

From the gene pool of an insect conjure a sequence, which defined the eye. Onto this his successors did not have an eye. Victory. They played the same one with a mouse then. He was panickymaus. Victory! It was filed then into the genes of the mouse the sequence of the insect eye. His mouse eye was neat, and not his compound eye that the insect sequence should have meant supposedly. Sic transit gloria mundi. his.

Let us not talk about the African gender bills, where the already sexually mature young girls once only a year turning they were transformed into a man with a full value. Only some. In a village in more. Not from transforming some idiotic spiritual patient with an operation there was a word, but from a continuous transformation. Many cases were documented, and are astounded. But what there is then it X and it with Y chromosome, which defines the genital character. But from where you sow man chromosomes? These were not hermaphrodites, but totally character ladies. The god wants to warn the feminists now, or the geneticists?

The atoms from themselves they do not form into living beings. The rocks do not give birth to lion, but even mice. There is even a sense according to a former statement of mine in them though. Was never made of a lifeless substance in the manner of our science yet to observe the formation of living beings. Meaning? There is not evidence which can be caught with one single hand for the formation of the life his evolutionary ideas. So temporarily only theory, because of this temporarily not scientific.

We one we are looking for a more logical and provable road at t

LEVELEK - MAILstartpagenext