|
THAI NEWS AIDS 2007 |
||||||
|
Religious beliefs hamper fight against Aids: Southern Muslims must accept the fact - December 2, 2007 Religious beliefs have hindered the fight against HIV/Aids in the southern region, according to a recent study. The study says beliefs against condom use and little sex education make Muslim women and teenagers in this region a highly vulnerable group. The stigma of being an Aids victim is a barrier in itself as it discourages Muslim sufferers all the more from seeking treatment. "The condom use campaign for Aids prevention should not be promoted in Muslim communities since it is against Islamic beliefs of abstinence and faithfulness to one's marriage partner," said Amporn Marddent, an academic of the Walailuck University's Cultural Studies Programme School of Liberal Arts. The research also shows that running Aids prevention and treatment campaigns in Muslim communities was a tough challenge for both the government and non-governmental organisations as most Thai Muslims still believe that only those having casual sex, and men having sex with men, could be at risk of HIV/Aids and that Muslims who strictly follow Islamic teachings had only a slim chance of contracting the virus. Muslim women mostly contract the virus from their drug-addicted husbands. There was also a higher infection risk among babies as most Muslim mothers gave birth at home and could not receive the necessary medication to prevent the transmission of HIV/Aids from mother to child, said Lawan Sarovat, deputy medical coordinator of Doctors Without Borders Thailand. Of the total 13,936 new cases found in Thailand this year, 36% were housewives and female teenagers, followed by homosexual men at 24%, according to the latest report of the Public Health Ministry. "It is evident that sex and intravenous drug use are still major problems contributing to the spread of Aids in Muslim communities," said Jirachote Sajjakul, coordinator of the Aids prevention campaign in southern provinces run by the Association of Thai Muslim Youth. "We have to accept this fact and seek appropriate solutions to deal with it." Heroin, kratom leaves (Mitragyna Speciosa), ecstasy and codeine, a controlled substance made from opium used in cough mixtures, were also widely abused by young people in the South and more or less contributed to the spread of the virus. Muslim men contract the virus from using injecting drugs during their teenage years and pass on the virus to their wives after marriage, Mr Jirachote said. A survey in the three southernmost provinces by the Bureau of Epidemiology also showed that married couples were the most vulnerable group. Schools in Muslim communities are downplaying the Aids threat by treating it as a taboo topic. The national report also shows that as many as 77% of Thai teenagers had little knowledge of the disease, reflecting why about half of the 321,650 cases in the country were now between 25 and 34 years of age. Over half a million Thais are still living with HIV/Aids. To solve Aids problems in Muslim communities, Mr Jirachote believes it was important for the government to come up with different projects for raising Aids awareness in the South. Provincial Islamic committees in the South are considering whether mandatory pre-marital Aids tests are feasible. Such a practice is already in place in Malaysia's Johor state since 2001. The test results will go to the religious authorities. If medically fit, the couple is allowed to get married. But otherwise, it is left to them to decide whether they should go ahead with the wedding and are not prevented from doing so. Blindness in Aids patients not being diagnosed: MSF says drugs are too expensive - December 2, 2007Blindness in HIV/Aids patients in Thailand, Burma and Cambodia is linked to a failure to diagnose and treat cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMV), according to a recent study published in the journal PLoS Medicine yesterday. The Doctors Without Borders (MSF) have studied CMV retinitis, which has been dramatically reduced in wealthy countries since the advent of antiretroviral therapy, but still found in many patients with advanced Aids in Cambodia, Burma and Thailand with 23%, 27% and 32% of the total cases respectively. "We can diagnose CMV retinitis fairly easily and reliably in less than two minutes, and there is an effective, practical treatment, if at least the CMV retinitis is mentioned in the current and pending WHO guidelines for HIV treatment in resource-poor settings, and if Roche kindly reduce more the price for the package," said one of the authors, Dr David Wilson, a former MSF medical coordinator in Thailand. The study, which is based on the clinical experience of Medecins Sans Frontieres and other programmes assessed by Dr David Heiden, a consultant from the SEVA Foundation in San Francisco, said detecting and treating CMV retinitis early enough would stop the slow but relentless progress of a disease that leads to blindness within three to six months in patients whose immune systems are severely weakened. But because there are often no symptoms in the early stages of the disease, CMV can only be diagnosed through the systematic screening of all at-risk patients. Routine retinal examination of high-risk HIV patients in Burma helped save patients from CMV-related blindness, Dr Kalpana Sabapathy, an MSF HIV/Aids adviser, said. But in many countries the best treatment option is oral valganciclovir, which costs more than US$10,000 (about 308,000 baht) for a four-month treatment course, too much for people in developing countries. "Until then, CMV retinitis will continue to be the neglected disease of the Aids epidemic," said Dr Tido von Schoen-Angerer, the director of MSF's Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines. In Thailand, MSF and its local partners have decided to use the sub-optimal intravenous formulation of ganciclovir as well as intraocular injections. Oxfam: Pharmaceutical industry is undermining its own future - December 1, 2007By keeping the traditional way of doing business that denies access to medicines to millions of poor people in developing countries, the pharmaceutical industry is undermining its own future, Oxfam says in its report. The report, "Investing for Life", looks at the world's top 12 pharmaceutical companies, including their drug pricing policies, their record in developing medicines relevant to poor countries and their stance on protecting intellectual property rights. Oxfam says the industry is failing to ensure universal access to medicines because it refuses to put the issue at the heart of its business model. As a result, it is failing to capture the full potential of emerging markets touted as the "new frontier" for its business success. According to a major consultancy firm, loss of faith in the industry on the part of its investors has so far cost pharmaceutical shareholders $1 trillion. "The industry is burying its head in the sand. More than 85% of the world's consumers are under-served or have no access to its medicines. The industry must recognise that charging high prices, quashing generic competition, developing medicines only for those rich enough to pay and fighting for harsher patent laws is an ineffective business strategy for new markets, as much as it is a moral outrage," said Jeremy Hobbs, Oxfam International executive director. "Investors are worried about the industry's performance. They know that emerging markets are key for the industry's future growth, but companies have been responding to the challenge of breaking into emerging markets in an ad hoc and inconsistent way. This is bad for the industry and bad for poor people who are still facing devastating diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, asthma, cancer and HIV/Aids without affordable medicines,' Mr Hobbs said. The report reveals shortcomings where the industry has failed to implement a systematic and transparent tiered-pricing policy, where prices for all essential medicines are set according to people's ability to pay. More importantly, the investors continue largely to neglect research and development into diseases that predominantly affect poor people in developing countries. They remain inflexible in protecting intellectual property, including challenging poor countries in court to stop them using legal public health safeguards. In addition, the investors continue to rely too heavily on donations to get affordable medicines to people, even though this is unsustainable and sometimes counter-productive. Oxfam notes that some companies are offering differentiated prices but this is extremely limited and mainly for high-profile diseases such as HIV and Aids. However, these offers are not systematic worldwide and are often still priced well above the means of people living in developing countries. Oxfam says that drug companies often adapt pricing in developing countries solely as a reflection of the publicity that surrounds the disease. In Thailand, the industry failed to introduce pricing policies for key first and second line antiretroviral medicines that would enable sustainable treatment. "The industry is operating in a short-sighted way because it could gain enormous benefits from emerging markets, including lower research and development costs and cheaper manufacturing. Yet instead it continues to blindly use its same strategies in poor countries. Even today, the richest 15% of the world consumes more than 90% of its pharmaceuticals. At this rate, both the industry and millions of sick patients are losing out," he concluded. Teens have sex younger, but no condom: Ministry: Rate of Aids infection falls by 90% - November 30, 2007 Young people are having sex younger but fewer than half use condoms, according to a report by the Public Health Ministry. The ministry surveyed the sexual behaviour of youths last year and found fewer than half who admitted they had casual sex said they used condoms. The average age of youths who had sex for the first time was 15, according to the survey, a drop from 18 in previous studies. About 36% of the males and 28% of the females in the surveyed group said they had sexual experience. The findings have been released to coincide with World Aids Day today. The World Health Organisation's (WHO) motto to raise awareness about Aids prevention this year is "Stop Aids. Keep the Promise". The figures from the ministry highlight concerns about the continued spread of sexually transmitted diseases, as well as the increasing numbers of unwanted pregnancies and school dropouts. The ministry said only 23% of male teens and 26% of female teens had been educated about Aids. Dr Somchai Pinyopornpanit, deputy director-general of communicable disease control, said some teenagers had sex to win acceptance from their peers. Many were under the impression that HIV/Aids only infects commercial sex workers. Dr Somchai was speaking after the opening of the ministry's anti-Aids campaign yesterday at Wachira Benjathat park in Bangkok. He said many teenagers thought it was safe to have sex with friends or someone they knew personally, so they did not feel the need to use condoms. Patchara Siriwongrangsan, director of the office for the prevention of Aids, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted diseases, said the ministry began a project to educate youths about prevention of the disease with youth leaders from 52 schools in 15 provinces last year. The provinces under the programme include Bangkok, Trat, Kanchanaburi, Nakhon Sawan, Samut Prakan, Nonthaburi, Chiang Mai, Lampang, Surin and Udon Thani. More than 28,000 teenagers have undergone training in Aids prevention under the project. Dr Patchara said her office has also launched Aids prevention activities in 16 communities and set up Aids prevention clubs in 11 schools nationwide. Dr Somchai said there were about 39.5 million Aids patients in the world last year. About 2.9 million died. This year the WHO estimates there will be about 4.2 million new infections. In Thailand, the number of new Aids infections this year is expected to be well down, from 140,000 cases in 2004 to 14,000, he said. Of the 14,000 new HIV carriers this year, the largest single group, or 45%, is female teenagers and married women. About 20% are homosexuals, he said. Prior to this year the Public Health Ministry estimates about one million Thais had contracted the Aids virus. More than 558,000 of them had died, he said. Saving children from infectious diseases - November 15, 2007 From today till Saturday, leaders in the fields of pediatrics, immunology and general medicine are gathering in Bangkok for the 5th World Congress of the World Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (WSPID), to explore how scientific innovation can improve the lives of people across the globe. Here, some of the world's greatest medical minds will contemplate two vastly different scenarios facing the world in regard to stopping infectious diseases in children. For the haves, the situation is stable. Affluent, industrialised nations enjoy access to life-saving vaccinations. In countries like the United States, France and Spain, inoculations have become routine, with new vaccines quickly made available to protect the most vulnerable - our children. For the have-nots, the situation is dire. Without dramatic action on a global scale to expand access to existing vaccines and accelerate the development of new ones, leading childhood killers will continue to take lives. The most common of these killers is pneumococcal disease, which causes pneumonia, meningitis and sepsis, and claims the lives of 1.6 million people annually, half of whom are children under the age of five. Sadly, children with HIV/Aids are up to 40 times more likely to get pneumococcal disease, and in Thailand where rates of HIV/Aids are high, pneumococcal disease places an additional burden on the national health system. History with new vaccines shows us that we face two major challenges. First, we must encourage the development of vaccines that are needed in developing countries. Second, we must make sure that once developed, these vaccines are scaled up and rolled out to the children who need them the most. In the past, it often took 15-20 years for life-saving vaccines to reach even 20% of the children in the world's poorest countries. Traditionally, the challenge has been ensuring that vaccines are developed to meet the needs of poorer nations and are accessible for those who are least able to pay. Today, new funding mechanisms and partnerships are working to overcome these obstacles. By investing directly in the development of vaccines, governments and philanthropies are assuring that researchers discover new vaccines against old scourges like TB and malaria. Similarly, by providing funding to assure there will be a credible market for these vaccines in poor countries, these same donors enable developing countries to access these vaccines earlier and at more affordable prices. These funding advances have created a tremendous opportunity to save lives, and the time for action is now. This is precisely the charge of the Pneumococcal Awareness Council of Experts (PACE), an international working group of 15 of the world's leading experts in infectious disease and vaccines chartered to raise awareness of pneumococcal disease and advocate for its prevention. PACE is leading the call for increased cooperation among physicians, lawmakers, heads of state and drug makers to create vaccines and distribute them to the neediest nations. Drug makers and governments have to join forces to find market-based solutions for market-based problems that have hindered vaccine production. The general public must make vaccine creation and distribution a top-priority item on the world's health improvement agenda, and remind our world leaders that the price of inaction is counted in lives lost needlessly to preventable diseases. The above article has been co-authored by Dr Somsek Lolekha, President of the Medical Council of Thailand; Dr Ron Dagan, PACE Council Member and Professor, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Soroka Medical Centre and President of WSPID; and Dr Ciro A de Quadros, PACE Co-Chair and Executive Vice-President, Sabin Vaccine Institute.
The Government Pharmaceutical Organisation's (GPO) labour union and consumer rights groups will rally at the Public Health Ministry today to protest against the government's planned abolition of the state drug firm's right to stockpile necessary drugs for public use. The demonstration is backed by local and international labour and health advocacy groups, including the Rural Doctors' Club and the International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General Workers' Unions (ICEM). The ICEM circulated a worldwide statement yesterday supporting the GPO labour union and Thai civil groups' demands for the dismissal of the draft decree that will halt the GPO's special status for securing drugs for public and emergency uses. The draft decree was approved by the government last month and is now being scrutinised by the Council of State. "We believe that removing the government as a provider of essential health needs, in any form, is a recipe for higher costs, with a bigger portion of the population going without adequate health care," ICEM general-secretary Manfred Warda said in his statement. Rawai Pupaga, the GPO's labour union president, said the government procurement of pharmaceuticals is first and foremost for the benefit of needy citizens. "It is not an urgent matter to change the procurement procedure now. There should be a public hearing so that other stakeholders can air their views," said Mr Rawai. Vichai Chokewiwat, the GPO board chairman, said the board shared the union's views and added that any decisions on streamlining the government procurement process should be thoroughly considered and not rushed. Dr Vichai said the decree, if enforced in its current form, would adversely affect the government's compulsory licensing scheme, which aims to enable the GPO to procure life-saving drugs for killer diseases such as Aids and cancer at affordable prices. Life insurer has a responsibility - November 7, 2007American International Assurance, a subsidiary of global insurance giant AIG, must come forward and clearly explain its policies towards homosexuals. So far, executives have walked a fine line between claiming that the company does not discriminate against homosexuals while saying that a person's "lifestyle" could affect whether they get coverage. This is not good enough. AIA has a responsibility to do all it can to avoid discrimination, and must state explicitly why certain individuals are denied coverage or forced to pay higher premiums. If the company claims all homosexuals have "lifestyles" that make them riskier clients, then executives must explain exactly what they are talking about. If it claims, for instance, that homosexuals are more promiscuous than straight people and thus more susceptible to terminal illnesses like Aids - which is certainly the implication when executives start linking homosexuality to "lifestyle" issues - then they must base this on some legitimate fact-based research. Studies show that gay men in Thailand are in fact not the highest risk group when it comes to new HIV infections. In what may come as a surprise to some, housewives are twice as likely to become infected in Thailand, according to a 2005 report by the Disease Control Department. The DCD report found that about 40% of new infections were married women who caught HIV from their husbands, while 22% were from men who had sex with men. Another 10% were married men who contracted HIV from their wives. Last month, Deputy Public Health Minister Vallop Thaineua said the number of new HIV infections in young women and housewives would likely rise to 45% of the country's total new infections this year, while the number of new infections among men who have sex with men was expected to drop to 20%. It is a bit surprising that AIA still leaves itself open to allegations of discrimination since the debate about whether an insurance company can deny someone coverage based on sexual orientation ended in the United States two decades ago. In late 1986, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners came up with a policy stating: "Sexual orientation may not be used in the underwriting process or in the determination of insurability." The debate turned to focus on whether insurance companies could take blood tests before deciding whether to cover a homosexual. But here in Thailand it is unclear if AIA even lets homosexual applicants get to that stage. Thailand's largest life insurer certainly denied coverage to the wrong man when it rejected the application of long-time gay rights advocate Natee Theerarojnapong, president of the Gay Political Group of Thailand. In June, when the Constitution Drafting Assembly agreed to recognise the rights of gays and lesbians by stating in Article 30 that differences in "sexual identity" could not be grounds for discrimination, Mr Natee wept. "This is what we have fought for for decades," he said. Mr Natee is not the first gay person to accuse AIA of discrimination. In 2001, Somsak Chalachon, owner of Chalachon Hair Studio, alleged that AIA denied him coverage even after he passed a medical exam simply because he was gay. AIA responded by saying it could not disclose "personal client information" (even to the client, apparently) and said it denied coverage for "high-risk lifestyles". Although that case faded away, Mr Natee is taking his case to the Administrative Court in one of the first major tests of the new constitution. This may force AIA and other life insurers to become more transparent in their policies towards homosexuals. While Thailand is generally much more open to homosexuals than other countries, individual cases of discrimination still exist - including the incident earlier this year when Novotel barred a transvestite from entering its nightclub. For all the progress that's been made over the years, homosexuals and transvestites still face social stigma. Each time a company like AIA, Novotel or any other takes a clear stand against discrimination of any kind, society as a whole will benefit. Gays accuse AIA of discrimination: Company says it protects against 'risk' - November 6, 2007 Gay activists have launched a protest against American International Assurance for unfair discrimination based on sexual preference. AIA executives said the company had no explicit policies against homosexual clients, but reserved the right to consider applications based on risk factors related to "personal lifestyle". Natee Teerarojjanapong, the president of the Gay Political Group of Thailand, said his application to purchase life insurance from AIA, the country's largest insurer, had been rejected solely because of his sexual orientation. He said this was a clear violation of Section 30 of the 2007 constitution, which outlaws discrimination on the basis of race, language, sex or health. Mr Natee yesterday submitted a complaint to the Insurance Commission and vowed to file a petition to the Administrative Court if he did not receive a response within the next couple of weeks. He also called on the office to investigate whether other insurers also adopted such practices, and planned to co-ordinate with gay-rights advocates such as the Bangkok Rainbow Organisation to launch a global campaign against AIA. "We condemn AIA's policy in Thailand for unfair discrimination. If AIA executives deny such practices, I will be happy to bring hundreds of homosexuals to the company to apply for insurance," Mr Natee said. He claimed that on Oct 28, he applied for a life insurance policy with AIA agent Pachara Pipatwong, who later informed him that the company had a policy to deny insurance to gays and transsexuals. Mr Natee added that he previously held life insurance policies with both Muang Thai and ING and that neither had ever asked about his sexual orientation. AIA senior vice-president Sutti Rajitrangson denied that the company had any explicit policy against homosexuals. AIA was open to all applications without discrimination against any particular group of persons, he said. But AIA reserved the right to evaluate policy coverage, premiums and set other conditions for clients in high-risk jobs or with high-risk lifestyles. "Life insurance is a risk-management tool for the public. Underwriting criteria is thus based on risks met by the general population," Mr Sutti said. "Anyone found to have higher risk than the general population could face higher premiums, limits in protection, restrictions on riders or even denials of their applications." Mr Sutti added in a statement that the company's applications were judged based on various factors, including sex, age, occupation, health history and lifestyle. "Out of our 5.8 million policyholders, we have persons belonging to high-risk groups as well. These policies were written based on our evaluation procedures and criteria," he said. Insurance insiders say it is not unusual that companies would take steps to limit their potential liability for high-risk groups, such as smokers or persons with past drug addictions. One AIA agent said customers are asked to fill out questionnaires to help the company assess potential health risks. The Aids epidemic in Thailand is certainly one major public health threat faced by insurers. Many firms require Aids tests prior to offering coverage, particularly for persons from higher-risk jurisdictions such as in the northern provinces where Aids is a particular problem. Generic AIDS medicine from India wins nod - October 17, 2007 The Food and Drug Administration has approved the registration of the second-line Aids drug lopinavir/ritonavir for use under the compulsory licensing policy. FDA secretary general Siriwat Thiptaradol yesterday said the drug has passed the registration process which took more than three months to complete. The newly-approved medicine is a generic version of Aluvia, a heat-stable form of second-line Aids drug Kaletra. Both Aluvia and Kaletra are produced by the US-based Abbot Laboratories. The government in January announced the compulsory licensing policy to bypass patents of the original versions of the second-line Aids drugs. However, the drugs' patent holder, Abbot Laboratories, opposed the move and offered to cut the price of Kaletra to $1,000 (32,500 baht) per patient per year on a condition that the Public Health Ministry revoke its CL policy. The ministry rejected the offer, prompting Abbot to freeze registration of Aluvia in Thailand. GPO board chairman Vichai Chokewiwat said the agency would soon import the first lot of lopinavir/ritonavir from India's generic drug maker Matrix Laboratories. The amount would be enough for 8,000 HIV-positive people for the next six months. The price quoted by the Indian drugmaker was at 24,324 baht (US$695) per person per year (2,027 baht per person per month). Meanwhile, leading cancer drug producers Novartis, Roche Laboratories and Sanofi Aventis will meet the government's price negotiation panel, led by Dr Siriwat, tomorrow to discuss the possibility of a price reduction. The talks would be the first between the government and the world's leading cancer drug makers after the National Health Security Office last month asked the Public Health Ministry to consider overriding the patents of four cancer drugs - imatinib, letrozole, docetaxel, and erlotinib - as their prices were considered too high. HIV/AIDS: Study prompts concern about side effects of antiretrovirals - October 15, 2007 Metabolic abnormalities caused by side effects from antiretroviral drugs are becoming increasingly prevalent among Thais living with HIV/Aids, recent studies have found. According to a pilot study by Ramathibodi Hospital's Faculty of Medicine, published in the Journal of the Medical Association Thailand, the long-term toxicity of antiretroviral treatment has become more recognised through a variety of metabolic abnormalities including lipodystrophy, which affects body fat, and dyslipidemia, which affects the blood. The latest study, conducted among 56 patients at the hospital, showed a high prevalence of lipodystrophy and dyslipidemia in Thai patients undergoing antiretroviral treatment. More than 66% of the patients that took part in the study experienced health problems such as high levels of fat in their blood, high blood pressure, abnormal fat redistribution, cardiovascular and kidney disease, diabetes, and insulin resistance. "In the past, people living with HIV/Aids tended to suffer from diseases such as tuberculosis and hepatitis C, but now non-communicable diseases have become increasing problems among HIV-positive people dependent on anti-Aids drugs," said Wisit Prasithsirikul, a medical researcher at the Bamrasnaradura Infectious Disease Institute. Dr Wisit also conducted a study in 2004 and found similar results. Many patients under the institute's antiretroviral treatment programme for over five years have experienced a high rate of lipid and glucose metabolism abnormalities, which are the major risk factors of cardiovascular and kidney diseases. The institute, which specialises in treating HIV/Aids patients and communicable diseases, provided free medical treatment for 3,000 HIV-positive patients before the National Health Security Office would include the locally produced anti-Aids drug GPO-VIR in the universal healthcare scheme. Of the estimated 500,000 people living with HIV/Aids in Thailand, 100,000 are dependent on anti-Aids drugs. A researcher said his team of researchers are working on a large-scale study to better understand the effects of each anti-Aids drug prescribed for HIV-positive patients under the treatment programme at the institute. He believed it was essential to conduct clinical monitoring among HIV-positive patients depending on ARV drugs under the universal healthcare scheme in a bid to better understand their effect on the prevalence of these abnormalities. Nutrition counselling should also be provided for HIV individuals so that they can be more aware of the effects the treatments they are taking have on their bodies and their health. Thailand To Build Anti-AIDS, Anti-Bird Flu Drug Factory - October 11, 2007Bangkok - Thailand will build a pharmaceutical plant that will produce drugs to fight Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, avian influenza, and manufacture other emergency medicines. India will help Thailand build the plant in 18 months and at a cost of more than $27 million. Thailand's Public Health Minister Dr. Mongkol Na Songkhla disclosed the plan during the signing of a business and trade agreement between the Government Pharmaceutical Organization of Thailand and the Hetero Drugs Co. of India. The GPO produces cheap medicines for emergency crisis in Thailand. Hetero Drugs is a licensed manufacturer of a generic anti-bird flu drug. Under the same agreement, the Indian firm will help Thailand plan the anti-AIDS drug factory and design the facility according to World Health Organization standards. The WHO standard will allow Thailand to sell the anti-AIDS medicine to member countries of the organization. The Thai plant is projected to make two billion tablets a year. Lack of funds halts condom ad campaign - September 25, 2007The Public Health Ministry's controversial Yued Ok Pok Thung TV ad campaign aimed at promoting condom use among teenagers will be halted after Oct 12 due to budget problems. "We don't have the budget to continue the commercials on television. However, we will promote the condom campaign through other activities instead," said Disease Control Department chief Thawat Sundarachan. Anupong Chitworakarn, director of the Global Fund in Thailand, insisted the "proud to carry condoms" campaign would not be cancelled completely. But he said the project will be promoted at schools and educational institutions via other activities such as exhibitions and concerts instead when the commercial contract ends. The department receives the budget to run the TV commercial from the Global Fund. The two versions of the advert - teenagers and adults buying condoms over the counter at a convenience store, and teenagers seeing health officials at community clinics to get condoms - have been on air for over two months. But some conservative public groups have criticised them saying they damaged Thai culture and even encouraged teenagers to be sexually active. They asked the broadcasting authorities to air the adverts after 10pm. However, a group of 30 teenagers representing the Thai Youth Network on HIV/Aids and a network of people living with HIV/Aids defended the commercials saying they were well-intended and did not encourage teenagers to engage in sexual activity. They also disagreed with the idea of running the ads after 10pm. Yesterday, they submitted a letter to Public Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla to keep the commercials running. "The ad has provided us with opportunities to communicate more with our parents on the topic of sex which should not be regarded as taboo any longer," Supawat Kiewkad, 16, from Makkasan Witthaya school, said it should be an obligation for young people to carry condoms to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancies, HIV/Aids and other sexual diseases. Cancer drugs targeted for compulsory licensing - September 24, 2007 The National Health Security Office will ask the Public Health Ministry to consider overriding the patents of four cancer drugs to help patients under the universal health care scheme. A panel chaired by secretary-general Sa-nguan Nittayarumphong will recommend the ministry approach the two drug companies concerned with an ultimatum - negotiate a price reduction or face compulsory licensing. The four cancer drugs are imatinib, docetaxel, erlotinib and letrozole. They have been selected from 10 groups of expensive medications, including antibiotics and diabetes drugs. The drugs are used to treat various types of tumours, including breast and lung cancer - a predominant cause of death in Thailand, Dr Sa-nguan said. Several thousand cancer patients were already being treated under the universal health care scheme, formerly known as the 30-baht scheme, which covers 48 million people. The health office wants cancer treatment to be more accessible to patients. "We could get a low-priced version of letrozole which is 40 times cheaper than the patented drug," said Dr Sa-nguan. Letrozole is a hormonal therapy marketed as Femara. If the ministry agreed with the proposal, a negotiating team led by the Food and Drug Administration secretary-general would discuss prices with the drug companies. He said the ministry should first opt for "voluntary licensing" to avoid complaints of unfair treatment from drug companies. If negotiation fails, then compulsory licensing should follow. Earlier this year the ministry announced a compulsory licensing policy for the Aids drugs Efavirenz and Kaletra, and heart drug Plavix. Compulsory licensing is allowed by the World Trade Organisation in case of a "national emergency". This lets the ministry bypass drug patents and import or produce generic versions of patented drugs for non-commercial purposes. THAILAND: STDs Are Spreading Fast Among School Girls - September 21, 2007 A survey of 13,429 students in 24 Thai provinces showed that more than 50 percent of the group did not use condoms during sex, which could put them at risk of infectious diseases. Somyot Kittimunkong, head of the AIDS Cluster Division, said most vocational school girls sampled had gonococcal urethritis. Somyot said the incidence of infections, especially among teenagers, was increasing because the government no longer launches intensive prevention campaigns, having scaled down HIV/AIDS prevention efforts over the past four years. The Public Health Ministry, for budget reasons, has also shut down STD clinics, which offered disease-prevention information to HIV patients and teens. The clinics' work was transferred to public hospitals. However, "Most hospitals lack an expert who could counsel youths or even adults with HIV," Somyot said, "so they don't have any correct information or feel confident in using condoms." The ministry's recent campaign to convince people to carry condoms has met with criticism. Ladda Thangsupachai, director of the Culture Ministry's Culture Surveillance Center, said the Public Health Ministry's message, if not clear, could lead to misunderstandings about what condoms are used for. Sujittra Prongsang of the Bureau of Vocational Education Standards and Qualifications at the Education Ministry said society must understand that teen sex is not an embarrassment, and condoms work to protect them from disease if they do have sex. Be open-minded over condom use among teens, public urged - September 19, 2007 Sex education and women's rights advocates have called for the public to be more open-minded about young people carrying condoms as it is an effective means to protect themselves and society. The group defended the health ministry's controversial TV campaign spots Yued Ok Pok Thung (Proud to carry condoms) as being well-intended and not being about teenagers' sexual desires. The issue was discussed at a seminar held by the Thai Health Promotion Foundation following widespread criticism of the campaign, which has been on free TV for two months. Critics, including some NGOs and members of the public, said the TV spots, which encourage youths to carry condoms wherever they go, have damaged Thai culture and even encouraged teenagers engaging in sexual activity. But participants at the seminar mostly agreed that sex is commonplace in today's society and it should even be a "duty" of young people to carry condoms to protect themselves and their partners from unwanted pregnancy, HIV/Aids and other sexual diseases. Somyos Kittimankong of the Department of Disease Control said society can no longer deny that teenagers are a high-risk group for contracting HIV/Aids despite the fact that condoms are easier to buy than in the past. He cited a study of the sexual behaviour of 13,429 Matthayom 5 (Grade 11) students in 24 provinces last year, which found that less than half the male students used condoms when they had sex for the first time, while only 43% of female students made their partners use condoms while having sex. Places where teenagers get condoms include convenience stores, public health centres, pharmacies and condom-vending machines. Dr Somyos said Thailand was entering the second phase of an HIV/Aids pandemic with new infections continuing to increase. More action, including condom use campaigns, was needed. Sararee Sae-Iaw, head of the Bali Hai vocational youth group from Chon Buri, said most teenagers in her group did not feel any special desire for sex after seeing the TV spots. "Condoms are common things, and seeing them has nothing to do with our sexual desires," said Ms Sararee. Nathapong Suksiri, of Youth Net against HIV/Aids, said since the TV spots began teenagers felt more at ease buying condoms at convenience stores or getting them from community health centres. "I think the spots make them feel more responsible for themselves and for society by carrying condoms," Mr Nathapong said. Ladda Tangsuphachai, director of the Culture Watch Centre of the Culture Ministry, said she was not against the condom campaign, but felt it may be too soon for everyone to accept the idea. "I believe no parents want their children to have sex before graduation. Besides, parents are different. Some understand the issue better, but some don't. "Working with parents who have doctorates and those who are market vendors requires different strategies. Any educational media should be made acceptable to every group," said Ms Ladda. Clarification about HIV vaccine trial - September 18, 2007 We thank the Bangkok Post for its interest in the Phase III HIV vaccine study being performed in Rayong and Chon Buri provinces. However, we wish to clarify several of the statements in the article "Final phase of Aids vaccine trial extended" (July 31, 2007) for your readers. The article states: "The final phase of an Aids vaccine trial in Thailand will be extended for another two years..." Actually, the Phase III HIV vaccine trial is not being "extended"; rather, the trial is scheduled to end in the summer of 2009 as planned. At its July 18-19 meeting, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended to the sponsor, the US Army Surgeon-General, that the trial should continue. It made a similar recommendation at each of the six previous meetings in its role as the independent data monitoring committee. A statement from the sponsor dated July 20, 2007 is posted. The last DSMB meeting was special because it was an "interim analysis", the only time before the end of the trial when the data are reviewed to see whether the data collected so far have shown that the vaccine prevents HIV infection. Only the DSMB has access to this information. It is unusual for a DSMB to stop a trial early, so the recommendation to continue the trial was expected. The article stated that the goal of this research was to "make the vaccine 80% effective after two years of research". This statement is not correct. The trial has two objectives: 1) to show that the vaccine reduces infection by 50% compared to placebos; and 2) to show that vaccinated persons who acquire HIV infection through risk behaviour have a reduction in the amount of virus in their blood (viral load). The article also noted that the "latest results showed only about 50-60% effectiveness". The DSMB does not provide information on vaccine effectiveness to any person outside its membership. The investigators and sponsor will not know the level of vaccine effectiveness until the end of the trial. The DSMB simply recommended that the trial be continued. No additional information was provided. A few minor points should also be mentioned. The sponsor of the trial is the US Army Surgeon-General. The US Army and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases fund the study. The Ministry of Public Health executes the trial and provides clinical infrastructure and human and technical expertise to conduct the study. Other collaborators include Mahidol University, the Royal Thai Army, Sanofi-Pasteur, and VaxGen. There have been many smaller clinical tests of vaccines similar to the combination used in the Phase III trial; these other trials were conducted in North America, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. A smaller test of this exact combination was conducted in Thailand by investigators from the Royal Thai Army, Mahidol University and the US Army. There have been only two other Phase III "efficiency" trials conducted for Aids vaccines. Both were conducted with vaccines from VaxGen, called AIDSVAX. One of those trials was conducted on intravenous drug users in Bangkok. The article mistakenly suggests that vaccine was 50% effective; AIDSVAX alone did not prevent HIV infection. We thank you for the opportunity to clarify the matter. DR SUPAMIT CHUNSUTTIWAT, Deputy Director, HIV Vaccine Phase III Trial, Ministry of Public Health THAILAND: AIDS Hospice at Thai Buddhist Temple Adds Free Clinic for Life-Extending Care - September 07, 2007 Since 1992, thousands of Thais dying with AIDS have sought hospice care at the Buddhist temple Wat Phrabatnampo-Center of Hope in Lopburi, 70 miles north of Bangkok. On Aug. 31, the temple opened a free clinic to dispense antiretroviral drugs to treat the disease, project leaders said. The new project will extend treatment and support to keep relatively healthy people with AIDS alive, according to a statement by the temple's Dramaraksa Foundation, the Lopburi provincial government and the California-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF). According to UN estimates, 330,000-920,000 of Thailand's 65 million people have HIV. "The number of HIV patients has continued to rise and increase rapidly, and many people are in need of [antiretroviral] medicines and better treatment and care services," said Dr. Wichai Thaitaworn, director of the Dramaraksa Foundation. "We therefore must expand our services for HIV/AIDS patients and serve their needs more effectively." Thailand's government provides virtually free antiretroviral treatment for most people with AIDS, but the center's new project will also cover the cost of other medicine, Wichai said. The project is expected to have one physician, a nurse, and a pharmacist. AHF President Michael Weinstein praised Thailand's leadership in its fight against HIV/AIDS, and he said he hopes this project is the first of many AHF will work on in the country. "It is my heartfelt wish that in addition to providing quality antiretroviral treatment and care services, these centers also contribute to a greater understanding of HIV/AIDS and help reduce the stigma that many of those living with the disease have encountered," Weinstein said. EU Scolds Thailand for Violating Patents on AIDS Drugs - September 05, 2007 In a July 10 letter to Thailand's minister of commerce, European Commissioner for Trade Peter Mandelson expressed concern about Bangkok's "approach to access to medicines," specifically Thailand's policy that drug companies must offer their medicines at no more than 5 percent above the cost of generic versions. "This approach would be detrimental to the patent system and so to innovation and the development of new medicines," Mandelson told the minister, Krirk-krai Jirapaet. In 2001, the World Trade Organization (WTO) stated that intellectual property rules should not hamper countries from addressing public health emergencies. Mandelson said he supports the declaration, but noted it does not "appear to justify a systematic policy to apply compulsory licenses whenever medicines exceed certain prices." He asked Thailand to enter into direct discussion with companies holding the rights to certain drugs rather than threaten to overrule the patents. In reply, Jirapaet said both WTO rules and Thailand's 1991 Patents Act allow government agencies to use compulsory licenses without prior authorization from the patent holders. Thailand has an estimated 600,000 HIV patients and has recorded approximately 300,000 AIDS deaths. Last November, Thailand broke a patent on efavirenz, manufactured by Merck Sharp & Dohme. In 2007, it overruled patents on Kaletra, made by Abbott. Compulsory licenses are particularly important in ensuring that HIV/AIDS patients have access to second-line treatments in case of drug resistance. In 2006, the World Bank predicted that the Thai government's use of compulsory licenses would reduce the cost of second-line drugs by 90 percent, a savings of $3.2 billion over 20 years. Doctors Without Borders protested Mandelson's call on Thailand, saying it "blatantly ignores basic public health safeguards" agreed upon by WTO. Drug giant threatens Indian firm with court - September 1, 2007Giant drug firm Sanofi-Aventis has threatened to take legal action against an India-based drug manufacturer if it supplies copycat versions of its patented heart drug Plavix to Thailand. The move, exposed yesterday by Vichai Chokevivat, chairman of the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation (GPO) board, is seen as the latest attempt by the drug giant to obstruct Thailand's controversial compulsory licensing moves. Dr Vichai, who chairs a committee overseeing the government's compulsory licensing policy, said a Thai agent of the Indian drug firm Emcure Pharmaceuticals recently asked the Public Health Ministry to confirm that buying clopidogrel, a generic version of Plavix, from the firm was not a violation of patent law as claimed by Sanofi-Aventis. The pharma giant has said selling clopidogrel to Thailand is illegal since the country had not made public its decision to override the patent. However, Dr Vichai strongly denied the allegation and insisted that the ministry had officially declared its policy on the compulsory licensing of Plavix. "The firm's remark is groundless and it will not be able to back its legal action against the generic drug manufacturer and supplier," said Dr Vichai. The ministry, he said, would send a letter to Emcure and the Thai agent confirming that the ministry issued compulsory licences for Plavix and Kaletra, an advanced anti-Aids drug, on Jan 25 this year, for local production or import from overseas. The ministry last week decided to import the generic drug for patients with heart disease from Emcure Pharmaceuticals, which offers clopidogrel at 1.01 baht per tablet, against the market price of 70 baht per tablet. Plavix, a blood thinner, is used to treat coronary artery, peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular diseases. He said that Sanofi-Aventis' threat would not affect the procurement agreement in which a first batch of 2 million heart drug tablets will be shipped in two months. A UN-backed project is helping HIV-positive women retain their independence through micro-credit sche - August 26, 2007 As an HIV-positive widow in Cambodia, Srim Phan had no hope. That was until she was encouraged to form a group, take a loan from a micro-credit scheme and start a sewing factory. Her life has since changed for the better, she said. The scheme is modelled on a critically acclaimed programme known as the Positive Partnership Project, launched in Thailand by the Population and Community Development Association (PDA). In 2006, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) used the PDA as a model for a pilot project to economically empower HIV-positive women. It helps the vulnerable women secure jobs and sustain their well-being. With US$22 million (725 million baht) from the UNDP, the Women and Wealth Project provides technical and marketing training in Cambodia, China and India. The idea is to help HIV-positive women live with dignity and economic independence. HIV-positive women are encouraged to work together to form small business enterprises to support themselves and their families. In principle, the programme allows HIV-positive people and family members not infected by the virus to work together. It also creates better understanding of Aids in communities and reduces the social stigma of the virus. "In a rapidly feminising epidemic, the socio-economic independence of women is essential. It enables women to cope with the devastating impact of the epidemic on their families and livelihood. Useful skills and regular income can reduce HIV vulnerability and help positive women live with dignity and security," said Catilin Wiesen, HIV team leader at the UNDP Regional Centre in Colombo. Gender inequality and stigma are critical problems for HIV-positive women and girls in the region. This was highlighted during the International Congress on Aids in Asia and the Pacific held recently in the Sri Lankan capital. Most married women contract the virus from their husbands. When the breadwinners die, women have difficulty achieving economic security and finding resources to run businesses and support their children. Some are forced to turn to the sex industry to survive. Mechai Viravaidya, chairman of PDA, said access to credit is a human right, and it is also the right of women living with HIV to be economically secure and independent. "With economic empowerment and business skills, they can overcome the barriers associated with Aids," he said. "As I have often said, to combat the issue of HIV, we must all think outside of the box." Srim Phan and her group opened a garment manufacturing business in Phnom Penh called the Modern Dress Manufacturing Factory. In Chennai, India, an HIV-positive women's network has established a conceptual design and printing business called Social Light Communications. It employs two HIV-positive women and two men as partners. Another group of HIV-infected women in Yunnan, China has set up a factory to make candles from bee's wax. "This project is a demonstration that we can be economically independent if given a level playing field and a little support," said Srim Phan, 27, who is the firm's manager. She said members earn about $45 (1,500 baht) a month from the export of clothing products to Japan and the US. "It's not that much, but at least we have some money to send our kids to school." Apart from economic security, the well-being of women living with Aids is also ensured. Members of the project's garment factories in Cambodia receive anti-retroviral drugs. It isn't easy to gain access to new markets, but she remains optimistic the group will get support from within the industry to sustain the business. P. Kousalya, service manager of the hand-made card printing firm in Chennai, said: "We are not looking for charity, but partnerships for empowerment. If we can access even a fraction of the market, it can make a big difference to our lives." The card business can generate up to $125 (4,100 baht) a month for each member to support their families. She is looking forward to breaking even and paying back money to the loan scheme. Net profits will also soon be pooled into the micro-credit programme for other HIV-positive women. "The job makes us feel alive and gives us hope for tomorrow. It also gives us the power to survive and to live for ourselves and families," she said. Drug licensing plan averted by donor offer: Swiss company will give drugs to Thais - August 25, 2007 The Public Health Ministry has cancelled its plan to issue a compulsory licence (CL) for the production of a leukaemia drug after the Switzerland-based manufacturer promised to donate the drug to meet the demands of all Thai patients. However, it will not go back on compulsory licensing on other drugs, despite pressure from the US and the European Union. The government has insisted the licences will save lives and that all CL moves will be considered carefully. Vichai Chokevivat, a public health specialist chairing a committee looking into the government's CL policy, said yesterday that Novartis International AG told Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla that it would donate imatinib, under the Glivec brand, to meet demands of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Earlier, Dr Vichai said the Public Health Ministry had planned to impose CL for the drug because most CML patients could not afford the treatment. He also met representatives of the Food and Drug Administration, the ministries of foreign affairs, labour, commerce and sciences as well as Aids activists to discuss a recent written request from the US for Thailand to stop issuing compulsory licences. The letter, dated July 20, was submitted to Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont by US ambassador Ralph Boyce. According to Dr Vichai, the meeting resolved that the CL policy would continue because the government has a duty to ensure people have affordable access to medicine for treatment of serious diseases. CLs are in line with the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Trips) and the Doha Declaration which permits flexibility on patent rights for the sake of public health regardless of trade interests, he said. Thailand says it will implement CLs only to save people's lives and not to reap commercial benefits, Dr Vichai added, arguing that some developed nations had issued more CLs than developing ones. "The US itself has widely issued CLs," he said. He said the government was studying a proposal by Gilead Sciences Co that offered to charge a low royalty fee for production of the tenofovir antiretroviral drug for HIV-infected people who were also narcotic drug users and had hepatitis C. He would pass on the meeting's conclusions to the public health minister and the prime minister. Jon Ungpakorn of the Aids Access Foundation, who attended yesterday's meeting, said the government's stance was in line with international practice and was based on morality. CLs will save patients' lives because drugs will be more widely available to them, he said. The death rate of Aids patients has dropped by 80% in the past five years thanks to availability of non-patented drugs but they now need patented and expensive drugs to cope with refractory illnesses, Mr Jon said. Govt buys heart drug from India: Compulsory licensing praised at UN forum - August 23, 2007 The Public Health Ministry has decided to import a generic version of the heart drug Plavix from India under compulsory licensing, a policy praised by a United Nations agency and health advocacy groups as an example for other countries to follow. The first shipment of two million tablets of clopidogrel is expected in two months, Government Pharmaceutical Organisation (GPO) board chairman Vichai Chokvivat said yesterday. The heart drug will be supplied by the Indian company M-cure, which entered the lowest of four bids, at 1.01 baht per tablet. The price compares with 70 baht a tablet for the patented drug available on the market. The ministry has already issued compulsory licences for two key Aids drugs, Efavirenz and Kaletra. It has already begun importing cheaper versions of Efavirenz from India, a major source of generic drugs. The ministry has justified breaking the patents for the drugs, held by Western pharmaceutical companies, by citing budget constraints in providing advanced medication for people living with HIV/Aids under the universal health scheme, which covers 80% of Thailand's 63-million population. Abbott Laboratories holds the patent for Kaletra while Efavirenz is patented by MSD, and Plavix by Sanofi Aventis. "The GPO will import the medicine and ask the firm to register with the Food and Drug Administration as soon as possible," Dr Vichai said. "We will buy two million tablets in the first order and the shipment is expected to arrive in a month or two." The ministry would save about 138 million baht, he said. An estimated 20.5 million tablets of Plavix are needed for heart disease patients under the universal health scheme. Only 20% of patients currently have access to the medication. The compulsory licensing policy was hailed yesterday by non-government organisations and a UN agency. But it was criticised by the United States, the European Union and drug manufacturers, which accused the government of stealing intellectual property and question its spending priorities. The Eighth International Congress on Aids in Asia and the Pacific, being held in Colombo, Sri Lanka, was told Thailand's decision to run with compulsory licensing was one of the most critical political commitments yet to combat Aids. It was a good example for other countries in Asia and the Pacific heavily affected by the epidemic to follow. "Thailand has made a strong statement by invoking a compulsory licence for the production of second-line antiretroviral drugs. "It's the right thing to do because we just can't provide those who need with only the first-line drugs because of the high cost," said Prasada Rao, director of the UNAids regional support team. "I urge countries in Asia and the Pacific region to use the WTO [World Trade Organisation] flexibilities to do more and show more commitment to Aids responses," he told the more than 2,500 participants at the meeting. The 70 member countries will address the issue in the Colombo Declaration, to be released today at the end of the five-day conference. The Asia Pacific Network of People Living with HIV/Aids has already released a statement calling on other governments, the UN and other organisations to provide access to antiretroviral drugs, including second-line treatment and other essential medicines, via the Trade Related Aspects on Intellectual Property Rights agreement. It said these were fundamental needs. It also supported the compulsory licensing policy implemented in Thailand and strongly opposed any free trade agreements which would jeopardise the rights of both HIV-positive people and developing countries to have access to affordable medicine. Health and consumer groups yesterday condemned US ambassador Ralph Boyce and the European Union's trade commissioner Peter Mandelson for protesting against the decision. The groups included the Thai Network of People Living with HIV/Aids, the Aids Access Foundation, Oxfam and Medecins Sans Frontieres. Jiraporn Limpananont, president of the Consumers Foundation, said the protest letters were an unwarranted intervention in Thailand's health policy to ensure proper access to health care and treatment. EMPOWERING THE VULNERABLE - August 2007 A UN-backed project is helping HIV-positive women retain their independence through micro-credit schemes. As an HIV-positive widow in Cambodia, Srim Phan had no hope. That was until she was encouraged to form a group, take a loan from a micro-credit scheme and start a sewing factory. Her life has since changed for the better, she said. The scheme is modelled on a critically acclaimed programme known as the Positive Partnership Project, launched in Thailand by the Population and Community Development Association (PDA). In 2006, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) used the PDA as a model for a pilot project to economically empower HIV-positive women. It helps the vulnerable women secure jobs and sustain their well-being. With US$22 million (725 million baht) from the UNDP, the Women and Wealth Project provides technical and marketing training in Cambodia, China and India. The idea is to help HIV-positive women live with dignity and economic independence. HIV-positive women are encouraged to work together to form small business enterprises to support themselves and their families. In principle, the programme allows HIV-positive people and family members not infected by the virus to work together. It also creates better understanding of Aids in communities and reduces the social stigma of the virus. "In a rapidly feminising epidemic, the socio-economic independence of women is essential. It enables women to cope with the devastating impact of the epidemic on their families and livelihood. Useful skills and regular income can reduce HIV vulnerability and help positive women live with dignity and security," said Catilin Wiesen, HIV team leader at the UNDP Regional Centre in Colombo. Gender inequality and stigma are critical problems for HIV-positive women and girls in the region. This was highlighted during the International Congress on Aids in Asia and the Pacific held recently in the Sri Lankan capital. Most married women contract the virus from their husbands. When the breadwinners die, women have difficulty achieving economic security and finding resources to run businesses and support their children. Some are forced to turn to the sex industry to survive. Mechai Viravaidya, chairman of PDA, said access to credit is a human right, and it is also the right of women living with HIV to be economically secure and independent. "With economic empowerment and business skills, they can overcome the barriers associated with Aids," he said. "As I have often said, to combat the issue of HIV, we must all think outside of the box." Srim Phan and her group opened a garment manufacturing business in Phnom Penh called the Modern Dress Manufacturing Factory. In Chennai, India, an HIV-positive women's network has established a conceptual design and printing business called Social Light Communications. It employs two HIV-positive women and two men as partners. Another group of HIV-infected women in Yunnan, China has set up a factory to make candles from bee's wax. "This project is a demonstration that we can be economically independent if given a level playing field and a little support," said Srim Phan, 27, who is the firm's manager. She said members earn about $45 (1,500 baht) a month from the export of clothing products to Japan and the US. "It's not that much, but at least we have some money to send our kids to school." Apart from economic security, the well-being of women living with Aids is also ensured. Members of the project's garment factories in Cambodia receive anti-retroviral drugs. It isn't easy to gain access to new markets, but she remains optimistic the group will get support from within the industry to sustain the business. P. Kousalya, service manager of the hand-made card printing firm in Chennai, said: "We are not looking for charity, but partnerships for empowerment. If we can access even a fraction of the market, it can make a big difference to our lives." The card business can generate up to $125 (4,100 baht) a month for each member to support their families. She is looking forward to breaking even and paying back money to the loan scheme. Net profits will also soon be pooled into the micro-credit programme for other HIV-positive women. "The job makes us feel alive and gives us hope for tomorrow. It also gives us the power to survive and to live for ourselves and families," she said. Amorous Thais rush to condom tests - August 22, 2007 BANGKOK - Some 1,000 amorous Thais have applied for 500 positions to volunteer to test condoms for customer satisfaction, a firm said Wednesday, as part of a campaign promoting safe sex. "We are surprised to see huge interest in our campaign with almost 1,000 applicants wanting to take part," said an official at a Thai marketing firm for condom-maker Durex. The campaign was part of Durex's efforts to promote safe sex as well as giving Thais "an outstanding opportunity to enjoy their favorite pastime," Durex said in a statement. Condom volunteers must be Thais aged over 20 years old, it said, adding that "no educational qualifications are necessary." Successful applicants will receive free Durex tester kits and be required to respond to an online questionnaire following each use. The Thai government has said HIV/AIDS is the kingdom's top cause of death, followed by heart disease. Some 500,000 Thais are infected with HIV.
Sri Lanka - International Aids campaigners have raised concern over a sharp increase in infections among Thai housewives, fearing the rise of new cases in this formerly low-risk group reflected the country's complacency in tackling the epidemic. Deborah Landey, deputy executive director of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/Aids (UNAids), said the soaring infection rate among housewives was alarming and intervention programmes needed to be urgently scaled up to curb the spread. She was speaking at the opening of the eighth International Congress on Aids in Asia and the Pacific held in Colombo. The Aids epidemic is constantly changing, she said, and it's important to know the current situation so effective HIV prevention and treatment campaigns can be tailored to help those in need. In Thailand, up to 40% of the 18,000 new cases found each year are housewives, which was previously identified as a low-risk group. Most housewives contract the virus from their promiscuous husbands who have had casual sex. The number was high compared to so-called high-risk groups, such as men having sex with men (28%) and sex workers (10%). In response, Public Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla plans to promote a "family condom" campaign to encourage married couples to stay monogamous. An estimated 580,000 adults and children in Thailand were living with HIV at the end of 2005, according to UNAids. In the region, Ms Landey said, the situation has worsened in Papua New Guinea, where half of new Aids cases are housewives. Housewives also account for at least 46% of all new cases in Cambodia, she said. Ms Landey called on policymakers of countries in the region to increase funding to the fight against Aids, especially among innocent and vulnerable groups like housewives and marginalised people. Myung Hwan Cho, president of Aids Society Asia Pacific, said the Aids response in the region was inadequate. The region can expect 12 million new Aids cases by 2010 unless immediate action is taken and cooperation between policymakers, the public and the private sectors is strengthened. The latest statistics show one-fifth of the Asian population is HIV-positive. "We now need not only more condoms, but also more treatment and different approaches to combat Aids in the region. Better action is needed because we're still a long way behind the epidemic," said Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa. He called on governments in Asia to join hands with the public and private sectors, particularly manufacturers and marketers of Aids drugs, to ensure drugs are available to all at affordable prices. "The threat to the well-being of humanity posed by HIV/Aids is such that it is necessary to rethink established policies with regard to patents and ownership of essential drugs, and think in terms of more liberal policies that are based on the needs of the people," he said. Sri Lanka has one of the lowest infection rates in the world, with an estimated 5,000 people living with HIV. However, the president said, the figure did not reflect the risk across Asia, and vigilance against infection in the world's most populous region had to remain constant. US envoy asks PM to help solve patent row - August 18, 2007
"The US government thinks it is important for all countries, including Thailand, to play a role in, and benefit fully from, the development of new and more advanced medical treatments. Strong protection of intellectual property rights, including patents, remains a vital part of that process," said Mr Boyce. The ambassador noted that while all World Trade Organisation (WTO) members have the ability to make appropriate use of flexibilities to address urgent situations, these decisions should not be made lightly and only as a last resort. Surapong Jayanama, secretary to the prime minister, early last month asked the Health Ministry's permanent secretary to consult with other agencies concerned, including the ministries of foreign affairs and commerce, to find common ground on the matter. The Public Health Ministry will hold a meeting next week with other stakeholders, including HIV/Aids patients, networks of heart disease and cancer patients, as well as the Labour Ministry and Social Security Office. The US envoy's concern followed a controversial letter from European Union trade commissioner Peter Mandelson to his counterpart Krirk-krai Jirapaet, as well as Foreign Minister Nitya Pibulsonggram and Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla, protesting against Thailand's consideration of the broad use of compulsory licensing. Expert warns of risks of bogus medication - August 9, 2007 A health expert has warned of the dangers of counterfeit erectile dysfunction and malaria drugs that have flooded local markets and neighbouring countries. Praphon Angtrakul, a pharmacist at the Food and Drug Administration, said the fake drugs were undermining Thailand's efforts to promote good manufacturing practices among domestic pharmaceutical producers. "This problem should be seriously addressed because it tarnishes the country's image and drug manufacturing standards, especially when Thailand is still under the Priority Watch List of the US Trade and Representatives in which intellectual property rights are very much involved," he said at a meeting on good manufacturing practices yesterday. Fake pharmaceutical medicines can often contain dangerous or ineffective substances that can cause illness, injury and even death. Mr Praphon said that in Thailand, most erectile dysfunction medication, malaria and tuberculosis drugs heavily marketed via the internet are fakes. Some are sent through courier services, the general mail or are on shop shelves. "Pharmaceutical sales in Thailand are worth about 80 billion baht [a year]. But the fake drugs trade can generate higher profits," he said. The FDA official also said the World Health Organisation (WHO) recently inspected the Cambodian pharmaceuticals market and reported that most of the counterfeit drugs, including antibiotics, penicillin, paracetamol and vitamin C tablets, were produced by illegal factories in Thailand that were already shut down. The FDA is in the process of investigating if any registered pharmaceutical firms were involved in the production of fake drugs. However, it is not just Thailand that is suffering the effects of fake drugs. Reports of the problem are increasing rapidly around the world, especially among developing countries. In Asia and Latin America for example, counterfeit sales account for 30% of the market, according to the WHO. FDA secretary-general Siriwat Thiptaradol said checkpoints have been set up along border provinces to try and stem the trafficking of fake drugs. But he conceded that counterfeit malaria, Aids, tuberculosis and bird flu drugs were a big problem, not only in Thailand but also in other developing countries. Dr Siriwat said counterfeit drugs often had extremely varied compositions. Some contain totally inert substances like starch while others are made of cheap materials like paracetamol, he said. "The poor could become victims of fake drugs that lead to health risks and can eventually cause death," he said. Most fake products found in developed countries include steroids, hormones and allergy drugs, he said. India and China are known to be major bases of counterfeit drug manufacturing and trafficking, he added. The International Narcotics Control Board, the Vienna-based drugs watchdog, last March released a report on lethal fake drugs worldwide, urging the UN and WHO to help member states which may not have sufficient resources to tackle the problem. PETITION ABBOTT: STOP THE INTIMIDATION! WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED! Global AIDS community expresses solidarity with Thailand and ACT UPParis. And urge Abbott to immediately drop the charges against the AIDS organization On May 23rd Abbott Laboratories, manufacturers of the antiretroviral drugs Norvir and Kaletra, became the first pharmaceutical company to intentionally attempt to cause the demise of an HIV/AIDS community group by filing a lawsuit in French criminal court against ACT UPParis. Abbott claims ACT UPParis’ April website “zap” shut down its server for a few hours prior to its annual shareholders meeting. French law forbids the limiting of access to a website, unless a defendant has a “legitimate motive”. Holding Abbott accountable for unethical business conduct and highlighting Abbott’s denial of essential medicines can surely be interpreted as a legitimate and honorable motive. A Paris judge has scheduled an Oct. 26 hearing in criminal court. If ACT UP Paris loses the criminal case, French law proscribes a maximum fine of €75,000, or $100,000 and/or the disbanding of the AIDS organization. Either option will result in the closure of ACT UPParis. HIV patients, doctors and their organizations have scorned Abbott for many years as a result of excessive prices charged for its HIV drugs and for the 400% price increase of its monopoly boosting drug, Norvir, in the United States. The company is now divesting from HIV research and remains only interested in maximizing returns from its existing HIV products. In recent months, the company has been embroiled in a standoff over access to its drug Kaletra in Thailand. ACT UPParis was among the many AIDS activist groups globally that joined an International Day of Action on April 26, 2007, to protest against the company’s withdrawal of applications for new lifesaving drugs in Thailand. Earlier this year, Thailand stated that it could not afford Abbott’s price for Kaletra. The Thai government announced that it planned to use compulsory license provisions, pursuant to international trade law, that allows countries to procure cheaper generic versions of a patented drug in health emergencies. By utilizing compulsory license provisions, the Thai government would save millions of dollars that could be used for lifesaving medications for its citizens. Abbott countered by announcing that it would not register any newly developed drugs in Thailand, depriving that country of the new form of Kaletra that, in contrast to the current form, does not require refrigeration, an obvious issue in tropical Thailand. Despite the fact that the compulsory licenses for Kaletra were legally issued by the Thai government in accordance with WTO TRIPS provisions, Abbott announced that it would refuse access of its new heatstable version of Kaletra to the 220.000 HIV patients in Thailand. The World Health Organization, doctors and community organizations globally have called upon Abbott to reexamine its position. The French and British governments publicly supported the Thai government’s right to issue the compulsory drug licenses. People living with HIV/AIDS in Thailand have pleaded with Abbott to reverse its decision and called upon the international community to show solidarity with their cause. ACT UPParis responded to their call with the alleged criminal “action”. Phone and fax zaps or sitins, which have disrupted corporate communication for short periods of time, or blocked employee work access, are not new to AIDS activism. These tactics have been used by many other activists throughout the many years of the long epidemic to draw attention to government or corporate acts and omissions. Such community “actions” in the past have been responded to by government and industry by initiating direct meetings to discuss options and solutions to very real problems and concerns. This has lead to regularly meeting with the community, who represent, and in many instances who are the actual consumers of the products generated by industry and government. This process has led to practices that are mutually beneficial to all stakeholders – expedited and ethical drug development and research, resulting in greater profits for industry and the dramatic extension of life and quality of life of people with HIV/AIDS. We believe Abbott’s aggressive legal moves are disproportionate and misguided. We call on Abbott to immediately withdraw its lawsuit, to meet with ACT UPParis and agree to change its current hostile policies and practices. If Abbott continues to bully ACT UPParis and patients internationally, AIDS organizations will have no choice but to continue to engage in such “actions” and to inform all stakeholders of the unethical practices implemented by Abbott Laboratories. The undersigned organizations stand firm in their solidarity with the Thai HIV community and ACT UPParis. We welcome this opportunity to debate Abbott’s shameful policies in Thailand and elsewhere. Regardless of Abbott’s decision on the case against ACT UPParis, we will not be intimidated and we will continue to do everything in our power to convince the company to reverse its unprecedented decisions to stifle freedom of speech and deprive the Thai people of lifesaving medications. AIDES, France AIDS ACCESS Foundation, Thailand AIDS Treatment Activists Coalition (ATAC), USA ARCIGay, Italia Community HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project (CHAMP), USA European AIDS Treatment Group (EATG), Belgium European Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (ENP+), The Netherlands Global AIDS Alliance, USA Global Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (GNP+), The Netherlands Health GAP (Global Access Project), USA International Community of Women Living with HIV/AIDS (ICW) LILA, Italia SIDACTION, France Thai Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (TNP+), Thailand. We need your help! More organizational endorsements will send a clear message to Abbott. If your organization can lend its support to this effort by endorsing this sign-on action, please send an e-mail to petition.abbott@gmail.com with the name and country of your organization. This letter is for organizational sign-ons, we are not collecting the signatures of individuals for the moment. We do encourage all organizations to sign, even if they are part of a larger coalition that has already signed. Thank you for your support! Final phase of Aids vaccine trial extended: Researchers uncertain about effectiveness - July 31, 2007
Chief researcher Supachai Rerksngarm said his team needed to extend the research until 2009 before concluding whether the vaccine was effective and could be produced on an industrial scale. "It's still too early to say if the vaccine is effective in terms of preventing people from Aids infection as the results that have emerged so far are not as effective as we expected," he said after a trip to the United States where he participated in the interim analysis with a team of vaccine experts last week. The project received funding from pharmaceutical firms and health advocacy groups in the US along with the Thai Public Health Ministry. The researchers' goal was to make the vaccine 80% effective after two years of research which began in October 2003. But the latest results showed only about 50-60% effectiveness, he said. But Dr Supachai insisted the clinical trials were still following the plan, which is scheduled to end in July 2009. A stumbling block in the project primarily involved the shortage of volunteers as it took a long time before all 16,000 people in the provinces of Chon Buri and Rayong were recruited as planned. Each volunteer was given either a vaccine or a placebo over a one-year period and followed up after at least three and a half years. The so-called prime-boost test combines two vaccines-Alvac, which was created by France-based Aventis Pasteur, and AidVAX B/E, made by the California based VaxGen Inc, to stimulate different immune response systems simultaneously. The trial in Thailand was the first time the two vaccines were combined as experts believed the combination was an effective alternative to HIV/Aids control. Previously, research projects in Africa had used only one vaccine at a time and the results were not satisfactory. However, some researchers have questioned the vaccine's validity, and the scientific ethics and efficacy of the trial. A group of 22 prominent Aids researchers in 2004 wrote in the journal Science that the trials should be halted because of the high cost and because the two vaccines used in the Phase I and Phase II clinical trials were ineffective in preventing HIV transmission. But Dr Supachai remained positive about the trials, saying the combination vaccine showed promising results. Efficacy of the earlier vaccine trial among sex workers in Bangkok was about 30% compared to the AidVAX trial at 50%. In order to produce the vaccine on an industrial scale, the efficacy level should be no lower than 50%. According to the deal with the pharmaceutical firms participating in the project, volunteers getting the placebo would receive the vaccine for free if the trial proved successful. In addition, the firms had to provide three million Aids vaccine doses for Chon Buri and Rayong residents within five years, he said. Unreasonable fear of HIV - July 31, 2007Ignorance is the major factor behind the shocking treatment of those known to have tested positive for HIV/Aids. Twenty years after the outbreak of Aids in humans panicked the world, and 10 years after experts confidently predicted a vaccine, science has produced neither an immunization nor a cure. There have been important advances, based on medical knowledge. Many people who contract the Aids-causing HIV, today have a good chance of being able to co-exist with the disease and live a somewhat normal lifespan. The poor still face huge barriers before they can obtain life giving medical care. But the biggest problem has become the ignorance and the discrimination of those without Aids against those with the disease. A group supported by the United Nations has launched a serious, pan-Asian effort to fight this problem. The Independent Commission on Aids in Asia and the Pacific might have come up with a catchier name. Nevertheless, the group has kicked off a programme to educate the public and boost the chances of HIV/Aids victims. It will be funded by UNAids, but the commission is independent and can apply local tactics to counter bias in communities across our continent. This is an effort that is long overdue. Ever since the outbreak of Aids in the mid-1980s, victims have had to withstand rampant discrimination. In many ways, Aids has become the new-age leprosy, where those with the disease are locked away from society. This is not only a figure of speech. Around the world and right here at home in Thailand, seemingly intelligent people refuse to approach Aids victims, force them to move from their neighbourhoods, and even discriminate against their families and children - who frequently are barred from schools. But while the discrimination is both shameful and scandalous, there must be a huge question of whether yet another committee is the way to approach the problem. The stigma placed on HIV/Aids victims and their families seldom originates from government at all. The problems described by those who are diagnosed as HIV-positive now have a familiar ring. Employers invent ways to fire them. Neighbours pressure schools to ban the children. More than 12 years after legislation barred Thai businesses and civil servants from separating HIV/Aids patients, the discrimination continues at a local level. Ignorance is undoubtedly the major factor behind the shocking treatment of those known to have tested positive for HIV/Aids. Many people still have the idea that the virus can spread through the air, or simply by a touch. Chakravarthi Rangarajan, the Indian who chairs the Independent Commission, has encouraged a series of meetings with government officials and representatives of civil society in the Philippines, Bangladesh, China and so on. The chief accomplishment after almost a year is the conclusion that governments lack what the Commission calls "an urgency of response." This is hardly newsworthy; it is something any reasonably aware person could have easily reported even before the meetings. What is needed, and what will earn the commission quick recognition and public support, is action. Example: The Population and Community Development Association has been providing micro-loans to Thais diagnosed with HIV/Aids to setup small businesses; it could use support and funds. Example: Bangkok businesses including tourist facilities openly discriminate against HIV/Aids victims; their owners and managers badly need serious education about a problem they obviously misunderstand. The drive to end discrimination against HIV/Aids sufferers must also go hand in hand with medical treatment. The campaign by Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla to reduce the price of high-technology medicine that allows HIV/Aids patients to live a reasonably normal life is because the drugs are needed for life. Such drugs must be affordable. There must also be a renewed campaign and law enforcement to educate the public about HIV/Aids. The shameful discrimination should stop. This should be the aim of the Commission. Safe-Sex Campaign: Thai girls rarely carry condoms - July 28, 2007Kittaya Jantarataneevivat, 16, giggled as she grabbed a condom from a volunteer distributor while strolling in front of a department store in the Ratchaprasong area yesterday. The girl, a student of Surasak Montri School, was among many young people, both boys and girls, who received free condoms in a campaign to promote safe sex by the Public Health Ministry in the city's main shopping district. The schoolgirl carefully looked at the small package, squeezing it lightly while giggling. When approached by the Bangkok Post a minute later for a comment, she immediately said she didn't want to talk about it. "Yes... I know what it is. My mother often discusses sexual diseases and how to prevent them with me," she said. Have you ever used one? "No!" Have you ever bought one? "Absolutely not!" she replied, with a blush. Even though girls in Thailand are now more open to sexual issues, they are still quite conservative when it comes to the subject of condoms. Unlike boys, girls risk being labelled as "bad girls" if they show they are too keen on this taboo subject. According to a survey by the Public Health Ministry, Thai girls hardly carry condoms and are also too shy to ask their partners to use them. The ministry's survey last year showed that of 80% of teenage girls who admitted to having had sex, only half said their male partners had used condoms, while 47% of teenage boys said they always carry condoms. The survey also showed that women, particularly young girls, are two times more likely to get Aids compared to men. The Public Health Ministry said a change is needed to this reserved attitude among women. In western countries, girls are more comfortable about asking their partners to wear condoms or even saying "no" if their men refuse to use them. Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla said he hopes the campaign will change the attitude of Thai teens and adults alike. "I wish Thai society had a positive attitude to condoms, just like when we use separate spoons when eating with others to prevent the transmission of diseases," he said. The ministry's safe-sex campaign will continue in the major provinces until the end of the year. Thailand to broaden patent breaking policy: Will cover all state healthcare schemes - july 26, 2007 Thailand is pressing ahead with its policy on compulsory licensing (CL) with a plan to expand the policy to cover all state healthcare programmes, enabling more people to access affordable life-saving drugs. The plan, initiated by scholar-economist Ammar Siamwalla, was endorsed by the National Health Security Office board yesterday. Currently, the CL policy on three important drugs for Aids and heart treatment - Efavirenz, Kaletra and Plavix - is basically limited to patients under the universal healthcare scheme run by the National Health Security Office (NHSO). Better known as the 30-baht healthcare scheme, it covers some 48 million people, mostly children, the poor, the elderly and the unemployed. Some of the patients who are civil servants, with approval from their physicians on a case-by-case basis, also benefit from the policy. Left out from the policy are office workers and labourers who are under the healthcare programme run by the Social Security Office (SSO). Under the plan, the CL policy will in principle cover all three schemes, said NHSO secretary-general Sa-nguan Nittayarumphong. At the same time, he said, a sub-committee on CL has been set up to consider a group of essential drugs which CL should be further applied to. The panel comprises academics, health experts and representatives from relevant state agencies such as the SSO, the Commerce and Foreign ministries, the Comptroller-General's Department, and the Budget Bureau. The Comptroller-General's Office is responsible for the healthcare budget for civil servants whereas the SSO manages the healthcare fund for workers and employees of private firms. Dr Sa-nguan, who chairs the sub-committee, believes patients under the SSO-run healthcare scheme should also benefit from this state policy. He also pointed out that the new drug list for the CL policy has yet to be finalised. So far, the subpanel has studied the possibility of enforcing CL on two cancer drugs, whose names have not been officially disclosed. But Dr Sa-nguan said all drugs listed for CL would be distributed to all healthcare schemes. Saengsuree Joota, a doctor at Ramathibodi hospital and president of the Thai Society of Haematology, last week urged the government to be careful in announcing CL on a leukaemia drug with the trade name of "Glivec". She feared that the policy would result in a disadvantage for some patients who already have access to the generic version of the drug. At present, employees of private companies who suffer from leukaemia have no access to treatment due to the high cost of the drug. Also, the SSO only approves a healthcare fund for bone marrow transplants, which cost about 750,000-800,000 baht. A leukaemia patient will have to pay up to 1.5 million baht a year for treatment with the drug. Mr Ammar urged health authorities to set up a system to manage and monitor drug distribution among state and private hospitals that provide medical services via the three healthcare schemes, to ensure that these drugs under the patent bypass would not be used for commercial benefit. Kaletra Aids Medicine: Govt won't budge on breaking drug patent - July 6, 2007 Thailand is sticking by its stance to override the patent of Abbott Laboratories' Aids drug Kaletra although Brazil has already agreed to buy the life-saving drug from the pharma giant. Health specialist Vichai Chokewiwat yesterday said the government would not accept Abbott's offer adopted by the Brazilian government. "We understand that the Brazilian government has a reason to accept the deal. But we cannot do that. It's not the option we are hoping for," he said. Dr Vichai, also chairman of the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation's (GPO) board, made his remark yesterday after Brazil Health Minister Jose Gomez Temporao accepted an offer from Abbott to cut the price of Kaletra by 30%. The lower price for Kaletra, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir, could save about $10 million a year for Brazil's Aids treatment programme, the minister said, and he urged other drug companies to follow suit by cutting prices. Yesterday's landmark agreement was reached a month after President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva issued compulsory licensing for the Aids drug to enable his government to import a cheaper generic version from India. Dirk van Eeden, director of Abbott's HIV communication & policy department, told the Bangkok Post in a phone interview that an agreement with the Brazilian government should set a precedent for Thailand to review the company's offer. To date, Thailand and Abbott have been unable to strike a deal on the price of Aluvia, a heat-stable version of Kaletra. The ministry has asked the company to cut the Aluvia price to about 5% higher than that of the generic version. But Abbott has insisted on selling the drug at 3,488.20 baht per person per month, or about 34,000 baht (US$1,000) per person per year, which the ministry said is still too expensive. Public Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla preferred the price quoted by India's generic drug maker, Matrix Laboratories, which sells a generic version of Aluvia at 2,027 baht per person per month, or 24,324 baht (US$695) per person per year. In another development, the GPO is set to buy the first lot of two million tablets of the heart medicine chopidogrel, marketed as Plavix, from India for patients under the universal healthcare scheme. He said the GPO has shortlisted four potential Indian drug manufacturers, but declined to name them. The cost of the medicine ranges from between three and four baht per tablet and its price could increase to five to five-and-a-half baht per tablet including tax and transportation costs, he said. "The patented version costs several times more than this," he said. The original heart drug owned by Sanofi Aventis costs up to 90 baht per tablet. In Thailand, it is estimated that five million tablets of the medicine are needed for patients suffering from heart disease each year. The first batch of the drug is expected to arrive in Thailand around October, he said. 40% of new Aids cases are housewives - July 5, 2007The rising number of housewives contracting HIV/Aids from their husbands is a matter for serious concern, Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla said at a recent seminar. Aids activists are calling for a revival of campaigns promoting condom use to curb the growing infection rate. Speaking during the 11th national seminar on Aids, Dr Mongkol said he was worried about the rising infection rate over the last two years, especially among married couples. Up to 40% of the 18,000 new cases found each year were housewives. The number was relatively high compared to other risk groups such as men having sex with men, 28%, and sex workers, 10%. Most contracted the virus from their husbands who had casual sex. Dr Mongkol said he was thinking of launching a "family condom" campaign as well as encouraging married couples to stay monogamous. "Using condoms should be regarded as showing respect to each other so that both husband and wife will be safe from sexually-transmitted diseases such as HIV/Aids. Wives should also stand up for a better deal from their husbands," he said. The national committee on Aids is working on the project with Mechai Viravaidya, widely known as Mr Condom. They will ask hotel operators to help by putting complimentary condoms in hotel rooms, he said. Mr Mechai, who campaigned for condom use among sex workers when Thailand was first hit by the virus, urged the government to pay more attention to prevention programmes. "Compulsory licensing is not the solution to Aids. It actually reflects the country's failure to promote a prevention campaign," he told the seminar. Mr Mechai, chairman of the Population and Community Development Association, was appointed by the national committee on Aids to oversee a sub-panel to promote condom use. Teenagers are regarded as a risk group as a recent survey showed about 67% of 6,000 respondents, aged 18-19, did not use condoms when having sex, he said. Meanwhile, Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva said Thailand should work closely with other Asean members when giving local drug manufacturers the right to copy drugs patented by big pharmaceutical firms Thailand 'on course' to achieve UN development goals - July 3, 2007Thailand is one of a small number of countries in the Asia-Pacific that is moving ahead to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Shigeru Muchida, deputy executive secretary of the UN Economic and Social Commission in Asia and the Pacific (Escap). Thailand has been found to have fared outstandingly well in providing universal access to primary education and health care along with reducing poverty. Countries that have made good progress include China, Vietnam and Azerbaijan, while India is among those catching up, said Mr Muchida, citing a mid-term review. He called for help for the "off-track" group as well as those which are below other Asian averages to enable them to achieve the goals set at the UN General Assembly in 2000. The MDGs include targets to be achieved by 2015 for UN members are to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve universal primary education; promote gender equality and empower women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal health; combat HIV/Aids, malaria and other diseases; ensure environmental sustainability; and develop a global partnership for development. However, there are a number of challenges ahead, in particular the "disappointingly low" contribution of developed countries in allocating 0.7% of their gross national income to fund the MDG programmes. "We need strong government leadership to make rapid large-scale progress on the MDGs, a continuous pro-poor economic strategy, full and fast delivery of developed countries' 0.7% of their gross national income on overseas development assistance (ODA), a successful and equitable conclusion of the Doha trade round, and for climate change challenges to be addressed," he said. Erna Witoelar, UN special ambassador for the MDGs in Asia-Pacific, said there were only five "good donors" which had reached or exceeded the UN target of contributing 0.7% of gross national income for development aid. The five are Denmark (0.81%), Luxembourg (0.82%), the Netherlands (0.82%), Norway (0.92%), and Sweden (0.94%). The statistics were from 2005. The contribution of the US, the largest donor in term of the amount of the ODA (US$27.6 billion), accounted for just 0.22% of its gross national income, the third lowest of the OECD countries. Ms Witoelar called for developed nations to live up to their promises. Besides, she said, aid should not be tied to political aims such as anti-terrorism or anti-nuclear programmes. Reaching the MDGs was very important as it helped reduce social and security problems, she said, adding that advocacy nationally, regionally and internationally was therefore needed, especially from civil society, the media, the private sector and parliamentarians. "If, by 2015, many countries cannot achieve the targets, the world will be in disarray with more natural disasters, poverty, political chaos and other forms of instability," said the ambassador. However, she also called for national governments' commitment by investing in good governance. "Funding is one thing, but good practice is also needed. It is very important [for governments] to eradicate corruption and install good governance to be able to deliver basic health services to the people," Ms Witoelar said. Infected mums urged to take anti-viral meds - June 26, 2007The Public Health Ministry is stepping up its campaign for HIV-infected women to continue taking anti-viral drugs after giving birth. It is the second stage of a five-year plan, lasting from 2004 to 2008, to provide care, protection and treatment for women during pregnancy and after giving birth, new-born babies and infected families. Public health permanent secretary Prat Boonyawongvirote said the ministry's efforts to provide treatment to HIV-infected mothers have failed, as more than half of infected women stop seeing doctors after giving birth. Discrimination by neighbours and health staff discouraged these women from seeking help. He was speaking at a seminar with local administrative organisations, NGOs and networks of people with HIV/Aids to lay down guidelines for the care, protection and treatment of infected pregnant women.Deputy Health Minister Morakot Pornkasem said there are 7-8,000 new cases of pregnant women infected with HIV/Aids each year. Without effective preventive measures to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission, the number of newborn babies infected with the virus could rise to 1,800 to 2,000 a year. He said anti-viral drugs can reduce mother-to-child transmission to 6%. The service will also be given to immigrant workers in 12 provinces - Samut Sakhon, Trat, Sa Kaeo, Si Sa Ket, Tak, Rayong, Ranong, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, Chachoengsao, Phetchaburi and Chanthaburi. The programme is supported by the Global Fund, which aims to fight Aids, tuberculosis and malaria, with a budget of 560 million baht. In the plan's first stage from 2004 to 2005, health staff were trained to take care of HIV-positive mothers after childbirth and infected family members. HIV-positive people were urged to seek medical help at the 100 public and 724 community hospitals. COMPULSORY LICENSING/PRIORITY WATCH LIST: Thailand is within its rights, say US reps - June 22, 2007 Some members of the US House of Representatives have demanded the US Trade Representative (USTR) remove Thailand from the Special 310 Priority Watch List (PWL) and respect its right to issue compulsory licences for drugs. Republican representative from California Henry Waxman, in a letter on Wednesday signed by 34 congressional colleagues, told USTR ambassador Susan Schwab to reply by July 9 on their call for her office to reassess the policy. The letter said Thailand's use of compulsory licensing to purchase generic versions of several drugs that were too costly for the government was a legitimate act within the international rights and obligations stated in the agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (Trips), under the World Trade Organisation (WTO). "It is difficult to interpret the decision [to add Thailand to the PWL in the annual USTR trade report] as anything other than retaliation for Thailand's recent actions," said the letter. The letter urged the USTR to reassess its policy towards Thailand to reflect the US commitment and respect for the rights of other nations to implement their intellectual property rules in a way that supports public health. Being put on the PWL has led to the elimination of the duty-free access Thailand currently receives under the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for gold jewellery and other exports to the US. This will take effect on July 1. The GSP cut penalises the legitimate exercise of the right to issue compulsory licensing, the congressmen said in the letter. "We call on you to take steps to remove Thailand from the Special 301 Priority Watch List and abandon any further retaliation for Thailand's public health efforts, and ask you to commit to respecting the rights of WTO members to freely exercise public health flexibilities under the Trips and the Doha Declaration, including compulsory licensing," they added. The compulsory licences Thailand issued were for non-commercial government use and therefore Thailand was under no obligation to consult with the patent holders, they said. The licences are for Aids and heart disease medications. Washington-based Essential Action, a non-governmental organisation, backed the move by the US lawmakers. The letter by the 35 congressmen reflected growing sentiment in congress that US policy on access to medicines must change, its director, Robert Weissman, said in a statement. "By using legal methods to authorise price-lowering generic competition on overpriced Aids and heart-disease drugs, Thailand has shown the world what it means to place public health over commercial considerations," he said. Essential Action agreed with the lawmakers that the USTR had put Thailand on the priority watch list to retaliate for the decision to use compulsory licensing. "USTR's retaliatory placement of Thailand on the priority watch list was designed to punish the country for prioritising public health over the interests of Big Pharma [large pharmaceutical companies]," he said. The trade measure was designed to send a message to other developing countries that they will be punished for issuing compulsory licences and utilising the public health flexibilities available in the WTO rules, he said. Call for tax revenues to fund drug R&D: 'Way to raise medicine access' in poor nations - June 19, 2007 A leading health activist has urged developing nations to consider using tax revenues to support research and development on essential drugs for the public, as an option for expanding access to medicine and avoiding patent disputes. Jon Ungpakorn proposed the idea during a seminar on compulsory licensing at Thammasat University's economics faculty. He said it would help developing countries invent important generic drugs without having to face restrictions placed by patent holders in rich nations. "As long as the issue of drug prices comes before the life and death of individuals, this kind of system will be initiated sooner or later as the unjust patent system happens the world over," he said. The funding for public-oriented research and development on drugs could be based on gross domestic product per capita, he added. The HIV/Aids epidemic is an example which highlights the problem of drug access, since many young adults in low and middle income countries have the virus but price barriers deprive them of access to treatment. In Thailand, for example, Aids deaths had surged from 8,000 in 1999 to 1,600 in 2006 after the country successfully introduced the locally-produced anti-retroviral treatment GPO-Vir and provided HIV-positive people with free treatment via the universal healthcare scheme, Mr Jon said. The Magsaysay award-winner also believes the issuance of compulsory licensing in developing countries would become "normal" in the near future since the patent system has restricted access to medicines for the majority of the world's population. "Developing nations should work together to seek ways to cope with increasing restrictions on essential drugs and other medical instruments necessary to treat other neglected ailments such as malaria and TB, which have been on the rise in the past few years," he said. The Thai government issued compulsory licensing under the agreement on Trade-Related Aspects on Intellectual Property Rights (Trips) to bypass patents on the anti-Aids and heart drugs Efavirenz, Kaletra and Plavix last November and January. The move upset big pharmaceutical firms holding the patents for those drugs. Negotiations on cheaper prices are still underway between the Public Health Ministry and the pharmaceutical firms. Mr Jon said the Network of People Living With HIV/Aids was keeping an eye on the talks between the state and the private sector and would push the present government to make the final decision on whether it will import drugs from generic makers in India or continue to buy original drugs next month, since the stockpiles of these drugs would run out in August. However, the state policy on compulsory licensing has sparked concerns in the business sector over the possible withdrawal of hundreds of Thai export products from the US Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) list after the US reviews the list on July 1. But Suthichai Iamcharoenying, chairman of the Social Venture Network Asia (Thailand), representing a group of private entrepreneurs, believed an estimated five billion baht GSP tax waiver was not as important as the lives of more than 6,000 HIV-positive people which could be saved due to the state policy on free Aids treatment and compulsory licensing. Negotiations on drug prices hit deadlock: Govt to go ahead with compulsory licensing - June 7, 2007 A meeting to negotiate drug prices between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and two pharmaceutical firms remained deadlocked yesterday as the Public Health Ministry confirmed that it would go ahead with its plan for compulsory licensing. Abbott Laboratories and Sanofi Aventis stood by their previous price list, while the FDA wanted them to lower the prices to 5% above that for the generic version of the same drugs. Abbott is sticking by its price for the heat-stable version of an Aids drug called Aluvia at $1,000 (33,000 baht) per person per year, on condition that the ministry revokes compulsory licensing of its second-line anti-retroviral treatment. Sanofi Aventis also kept the price of Plavix at 27 baht per tablet for patients receiving treatment under the Social Security Office and the universal healthcare schemes. "If there is no satisfactory agreement on prices, the ministry may have to make a decision to buy drugs from generic makers," said FDA secretary-general Siriwat Thiptaradol. The ministry says it is determined to finalise its decision on compulsory licensing by the middle of next month. Vichai Chokewiwat, chairman of the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation, said the ministry would like to defer the decision until after the US Trade Representative reviews a list of export products expected to be withdrawn from the US Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) on July 1. "I want to be sure that any decision made regarding our policy on life-saving drugs will not affect economic and trade relations as a whole," he said. In early April, the US downgraded Thailand to Priority Watch List status for its handling of intellectual property rights. It was seen as punishment for the ministry's decision to allow compulsory licensing for the HIV/Aids drugs Efavirenz and Kaletra and the heart drug Plavix. The US embassy said compulsory licensing was just one factor which led to the downgrading. It said the possible withdrawal of certain export products from the US Generalised System of Preferences list would not be linked to the compulsory licensing policy. Products that face being taken off the GSP list include jewellery, polyethylene, rubber, hand-crafted flowers, television sets and shrimps. Dr Vichai said the decision on compulsory licensing would also cover the process of registering some important generic drugs which had not yet been introduced to Thailand. Merck offers free Aids treatment for children - June 2, 2007The Public Health Ministry yesterday accepted for consideration American pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co's offer of free anti-Aids medication, in the form of a syrup, to treat 2,500 Thai HIV-positive children. The firm's proposal was seen as another bid by the company to convince the ministry not to put the firm's Aids drug Efavirenz under its compulsory licensing policy. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) secretary-general Siriwat Tiptaradol said after meeting representatives of MSD Thailand, a subsidiary of Merck & Co Inc, that he would soon discuss the free treatment offer for child Aids patients with local medical experts. If approved, it would be the first time that Thailand would be using a liquid second-line Aids drug to treat child patients, he said. "As the firm has refused to further reduce the price of Efavirenz from 762 baht per patient per month, they are now trying to make up for that by offering this syrup for HIV-positive children instead," said Dr Siriwat, who also chairs a committee negotiating a reduction in the price of patented drugs. According to the Aids Access Foundation, there are around 8,000 children with the infection in the country. Several rounds of price negotiations between the committee and giant foreign multi-national drug companies have already taken place since the government issued compulsory licenses for three Aids and heart disease drugs, including Abbott Laboratories' Kaletra, Merck's Efavirenz, and Sanofi-aventis' Plavix. Breaking drug patents will empower the government to manufacture or import generic versions of the medicines to improve access for the poor to expensive life-saving drugs.
Thailand to override more patented drugs: minister -- Monday, May 28, 2007 BANGKOK -- Thailand, which has overridden international patents on three drugs in the past year, plans to issue two more local licenses this year for copycat versions of medicines, Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla said on Monday. The new licenses would be for the country's top killing diseases, especially cancer, Mongkol told reporters, but declined to name them. "In the remaining six months I have left, we will do it on the drugs that are needed to save the lives of the poor," said Mongkol, referring to the term of the interim army--appointed government due to expire after elections in December. "Altogether, we will impose compulsory licensing on up to five necessary drugs," said Mongkol, who failed to win a sympathetic ear from trade officials in Washington last week. Thailand is negotiating with French and American makers of two HIV/AIDS drugs and a heart medicine to lower their prices after Bangkok overrode patents. The compulsory licensing, which Thailand says is legal under the World Trade Organization's rules, has drawn flak from global drug makers and Washington, but applause from HIV/AIDS advocacy groups. Mongkol urged drug companies to charge a range of prices for one medicine so that rich and poor would have the same access to the same drug. "This is not a threat, but an appeal to the drug companies to have sympathy for the poor. One price for the rich and one price for the poor. At the end, it will be win--win for everyone." Mongkol said there was progress in haggling with two makers of the three drugs to get prices down closer to their generic equivalents, but not with Abbott Laboratories (ABT.N: Quote, Profile, Research, which makes the HIV/AIDS drug Kaletra. Abbott refused to budge on its offer of $1,000 per patient per year for a heat--stable version of the drug during negotiations with Thai officials this month. Aluvia is needed badly in tropical Thailand because it does not require refrigeration like Kaletra, eliminating the need for costly cold storage. Abbott recently cut its price for Kaletra and Aluvia to $1,000 per patient per year in 40 low-- and middle--income countries, but Thailand says it is still too expensive. Mongkol said Thailand would not scrap compulsory licensing on the three drugs even if the patent owners agreed to sell their products at prices close to generic ones because the rules allowed Thailand to buy generic versions. "We can't leave generic drugs out of our purchases. Without them, patented drug makers will put price pressure on us again," Mongkol said. Govt considers revoking compulsory licence for Efavirenz - May 24, 2007 The government is considering revoking the compulsory licence issued for a generic version of the HIV/Aids medicine Efavirenz after a promising start to informal talks with patent holder Merck & Co Inc in the United States yesterday. Public Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla said Merck representatives proposed several interesting options for the anti-retroviral medication which could lead to a win-win solution for both sides. "Who wants to buy generic drugs for treating patients if the original drug is more affordable?" he said during a teleconference from the United States. His unexpected comment came just one day after he said the trip to the US had failed to make any inroads into ending the disagreements between Thailand and US pharmaceutical firms. US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez was reported to have put pressure on the Thai team to abandon its policy of compulsory licensing. The Public Health Ministry last November issued a compulsory licence to import a generic version of Efavirenz from Indian drug maker Ranbaxy which would cost 540 baht per month per patient - considerably cheaper than the original drug, which costs 726 baht per month per patient. Dr Mongkol did not give details of the options proposed by the New Jersey-based pharmaceutical firm but said it could be a good example for other drug makers whose patents for Aids and blood thinning drugs had been overridden. Dr Mongkol insisted the government reserved the right to use compulsory licensing if a problem of access to affordable medicines occurred with any life-threatening disease in Thailand. Thai Public Health, Commerce and Foreign Affairs ministry officials were in the US to explain to US representatives from various sectors, including pharmaceutical firms, the government's decisions to bypass patents on Aids drugs Efavirenz and Kaletra and the heart drug Plavix. Billy Tauzin, president and chief executive of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, representing the leading US pharmaceutical research and biotechnology companies, also made it clear to the health minister that leading American drug firms remained deeply troubled by Thailand's use of compulsory licensing. "Pursuing such drastic measures, as the Thai government has done, not only hurts the innovative engine that helps economies around the world prosper. Worse, it could also limit access to new breakthrough medicines for patients suffering from life-threatening diseases such as HIV/Aids and cancer," he said. "Clearly, Thai patients deserve better." But Dr Mongkol argued that Washington had received misleading information about Thai policy. Virat Poorahong of the Thai network Living with HIV/Aids expressed concern at the government's indecisiveness. "We do not support the government threatening drug companies by announcing compulsory licensing. But we want the government to think and act fast," Mr Virat said. "We're talking about the lives of half a million HIV-positive people and many more cancer patients who could be short of life-saving medications." TB Epidemic in Thailand - May 23, 2007 Some 90,000 TB infections occur every year in Thailand, and about 15,000, or 16.5 percent, of these cases are in Bangkok, according to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Health Department. At least 60 percent of the Bangkok patients are younger than age 45 and many live in crowded areas, said Dr. Chanchai Kumphong, the department's deputy director. Dr. Chuchai Sornchamni, senior official of the National Health Security Office, said random checks of people in crowded venues like retail centers have found about one TB case per 500 people. Moves in the US against Thailand: Bangkok targeted over breaking drug patents - May 22, 2007 A Republican congressman in the United States has called on President George W. Bush to suspend Thailand's status as a major non-Nato ally pending proof of the restoration of democracy in the kingdom. Mark Kirk submitted a bill to this effect amid sustained lobbying in the US against Thailand's overriding of patents for medicines to treat HIV/Aids and heart disease. "Eight months after the military coup, despite promises by the military leaders to the contrary, Thailand still has not drafted a permanent constitution, held a referendum, or called elections," Mr Kirk said in the proposal which he tabled on May 17. The US President should "terminate Thailand's status as a major non-Nato ally until he can certify to the Congress that democracy has been restored to the country," Mr Kirk said in further remarks to the speaker. He said he was "introducing the Thailand Democracy Act of 2007 to push Thailand's military government to hold democratic elections". Thailand was designated a major non-Nato ally on Dec 30, 2003. The status makes the country eligible for several benefits related to the purchase and maintenance of arms from the US, training, and participation in counter-terrorism activities. Meanwhile, James V. deLong, special counsel to law firm Kamlet Shepherd & Reichert, deplored what he called " a campaign of intellectual property theft" by the government of Thailand. In a letter to four US government figures, he called on them to look into the matter and to "act swiftly using any and all available political and policy tools at your disposal". The letters were addressed to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Health and Human Services Michael Leavitt, and US Trade Representative Susan Schwab. In a separate move, the Washington-based Hudson Institute has sent a letter to the World Health Organisation's director-general, Margaret Chan, demanding the WHO "investigate important quality and safety issues pertaining to HIV/Aids treatment in Thailand". Institute director Jeremiah Norris wrote: "Thai patients deserve to be informed of the health consequences inherent in current treatment regimens, especially through the use of an anti-retroviral drug, GPO-VIR." He urged the WHO chief to sponsor an independent evaluation of GPO-VIR to prove that it is as safe and efficient as the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation, the drug's manufacturer, claims. The letter was also addressed to the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, Thai Public Health Minister Mongkol na Songkhla, and Suwit Wibulpolprasert, the Thai representative to the WHO. This follows a recent move by American lobby group USA for Innovation, which published full-page advertisements in Thai newspapers claiming the locally-made GPO-VIR had an unusually high resistance rate among patients using it. The advertisements prompted the GPO to file a libel charge against the lobbyist on May 15. US Envoy Wants To Heal Rift - May 22, 2007 Thailand's issuing of compulsory licences to bypass patents on Aids and heart drugs has rattled the multi-billion dollar pharmaceuticals business. The country has been closely watched, particularly by American firms holding patents, and by the US administration. US ambassador to Thailand Ralph Boyce reflected on the issue in an interview with Apiradee Treerutkuarkul. Following are excerpts from the interview. What is the US view of Thailand's announcement of compulsory licensing (CL)? We understand Thailand's rights under Trips [the agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights] to use compulsory licensing. But it was meant to be the last measure. As far as the embassy is concerned, in terms of transparency, we did not have much advance notice at all that Thailand was going to go ahead with compulsory licensing. The public health minister said publicly that Thailand had tried to get drug companies' attention for two years. That is the minister's statement, but all I can say is that we at the embassy did not have any real warning that it was coming. And the spirit of the Trips agreement is that a compulsory licence is like the last option, and the preferred order of things is the country and the drug companies [first] try to negotiate a mutually acceptable price. Our preferred outcome [for the] US government is that Abbott [Laboratories] and the Ministry of Public Health come up with a mutually acceptable price, because the key here is finding the balance between the high cost of financing innovation and next-generation drugs and the need to be able to provide those drugs to poor people who are suffering from life-threatening diseases. Compulsory licensing is one way to do that, but it is hopefully the measure you use [after] trying everything else first. Why was there doubt over the transparency of the process in the latest special 301 report of the Office of the US Trade Representative? As for the special 301 report in which Thailand has been elevated to the Priority Watch List (PWL), what I want to make clear is that the decision was based on the whole spectrum of intellectual property rights (IPR), not just on the CL issue. In fact, the CL issue was just one among many concerns ranging from DVDs, music CDs, books, software and brand-name apparel. Had there not been a flap about CL, I suspect that Thailand would have been elevated to the PWL anyway because we have been hearing from both Thai and American intellectual property rights holders in Thailand that the situation in terms of enforcement has been getting worse. The flap over CL caused most people to conclude that it must be a form of retaliation. It is a timing issue more than anything. I believe that with the overall IPR problems in Thailand, even without CL there still would have been a decision [to put Thailand on the] PWL. What is the stance of the US on balancing protection of intellectual property rights and humanitarian needs, especially on the issue of access to drugs in developing countries, including Thailand? Frankly, there are extreme views on both sides. We all know about some of the publications like the Adelman article [in the Washington Times] in the US. Some charges and allegations have been made against the pharmaceuticals industry here. As usual, the truth lies somewhere in-between ... The humanitarian issues are important and the Clinton Foundation's announcement that it would create a stockpile of drugs for 16 countries including Thailand, where they could make available expensive drugs for the poor, is a good example of creativity that is very useful in finding that balance, because the companies have to spend massive amounts of money to create an innovation and come up with new drugs to help people who need them. Are they supposed to bear the full burden? Are their stock holders supposed to bear the whole burden of the cost of the research, etc? There is an issue of subsidies, and whether some of the medicines should be subsidised by the governments of the countries. So there are a lot of different ways to do this, rather than looking at it in just black and white. You also had an opportunity to bring pharmaceutical companies to meet the public health minister? What was that all about? The role of the US government is to try to facilitate conversation and negotiation, striking the balance, suggesting creative ideas, etc. The only thing the embassy was doing in bringing some of the pharmaceutical companies to meet the previous minister [Phinij Jarusombat] was providing the opportunity for the ministry to hear from the companies. The role of the embassy was not advocacy on that particular issue, but simply door-opening. We do this for a number of ministers and a number of different sectors. Facilitation of communication between American companies and the Royal Thai Government in every sector is one of the most important roles of the embassy. The more conversations and communication the better, as far as I am concerned. Do you think Thailand is doing enough in trying to communicate with Washington? This issue has become such a hot, emotionally-charged issue. I certainly understand why that is, on both the Thai and the US sides. But [we should] get away from the emotion and back towards the communication and try to work together, which Thailand and the US have a great track record of doing for decades. It's important to recall that for the United States, some of our most emotional arguments are with our best friends, usually over trade issues. With either Japan or the EU, we have had some of the most challenging problems with our closest friends over trade issues. That's because when we get into a relationship, [it becomes] very sophisticated and complicated. This issue has captured people's attention because it is so rare for the US and Thailand to have a big flap. It's unusual. What is your view of the recent advertisement by USA for Innovation against the Thai policy on compulsory licensing? I would like to distance the US government from this organisation, which most people had never heard of before. The content of the [advertisement] is insulting in many ways. It does not reflect the government's view. I was surprised when I saw the advert in the newspaper. The letter uses extremely strong words and made several accusations that certainly the US government does not agree with. What are the details of any plan of action? First of all, we don't have any plan of action ... The approach we are going to take is to sit down with the Commerce Ministry and discuss ways to get Thailand off the Priority Watch List, not hand a list of demands. This is going to be about mutually exploring how to better enforce the existing laws, and how the US might be able to provide any indoor equipment to facilitate that process. How is the US going to follow up on Thailand's public health policy on compulsory licensing? We hope to get in close touch with the Public Health Ministry in the new year, after the election. We are looking forward to meeting Dr Mongkol after meetings in Geneva and Washington. I think it is safe for both sides to strive to find ways to avoid having any more compulsory licences. We can't go back and undo what has already been declared. In a couple of cases, they haven't actually imported generic drugs yet and they're still talking with drug companies. So we want to encourage informal talks to avoid formal announcements. Mongkol to promote safe sex - May 21, 2007 Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla will promote safe sex worldwide when he chairs the board of UNAids next month. Dr Mongkol said his new role in UNAids, the world's anti-Aids policy body, would be a good opportunity for Thailand to help promote 100% condom use worldwide. Dr Mongkol, who was recently picked to succeed the Swedish public health minister as chairman of the UNAids board, said over 40 million people worldwide have the HIV/Aids virus and about 95% of the victims are in developing countries. He blamed unsafe sex for the spread of HIV/Aids, noting that only 20% of people in risk groups, including sex workers, use condoms. In Thailand, condom use among sex workers stood at 87%. Thailand has won recognition for its role in its fight against the deadly virus through the promotion of condom use. Dr Mongkol will begin serving as chairman of UNAids on June 25. The UNAids board comprises 37 members from 22 member countries and other international organisations. His term will last for one year. Health ministers from developing and developed countries take turns to chair the organisation. Cancer next priority in pharma war: Minister unveils new drug licensing plan - May 16, 2007 Buoyed by global support for its bid to improve access to cheap medicines, the Public Health Ministry is now eyeing cancer drugs as its next target. Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla yesterday unveiled a plan to enforce compulsory licensing for cancer drugs next. "It's essential, as cancer ranks among the top five causes of death for Thais, with accidents, HIV/Aids, heart diseases and elderly people's diseases," he said in a telephone interview from Geneva. Previous reports about a move to issue compulsory licences for cancer drugs could not be confirmed until Dr Mongkol spoke yesterday. The National Health Security Office (NHSO) is currently studying the pros and cons of issuing licences for a group of cancer drugs which are still under patent in Thailand. In the 2006 fiscal year, the government spent more than 1.2 billion baht on about 50,000 cancer patients receiving treatment through the universal healthcare scheme run by the NHSO. Dr Mongkol is in Geneva to attend a World Health Organisation assembly before going to Washington next Monday and Tuesday to explain the government's decision to bypass patents on Aids drugs produced by an American company. He used his European visit to meet for 30 minutes with US Secretary of Health and Human Services Michael Leavitt. Top of their agenda was Thailand's issuing compulsory licences to import or produce cheaper generic versions of the Aids drugs Efavirenz and Kaletra and the heart disease drug Plavix. Kaletra is made by US-based Abbot Laboratories. Dr Mongkol claimed Mr Leavitt understood the transparency of Thailand's announcement and showed sympathy for the effort to bypass patents on costly drugs to increase access for the poor. Thailand has been attacked by US and European drug firms since the announcement of the policy. Dr Mongkol and Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont have defended the Thai position, insisting the country was not breaking World Trade Organisation rules on the issue. The US Trade Representative earlier this month placed Thailand on the Priority Watch List for the first time since 1992, citing intellectual rights violations. The government's decision to issue compulsory licences for drugs was one of the issues leading to the downgrading of the country's status. The US secretary of health and human services urged Thailand to "try harder" to negotiate with drug companies on the issue of prices. But Dr Mongkol insisted that he would not revoke the compulsory licences for the three costly drugs unless the drug companies cut prices to below the generic versions. "Let me do my job so that I can help the poor survive deadly diseases like others," he said. Dr Mongkol also said he would make the final decision on whether the government will buy the first batch of the second-line Aids drug Aluvia from Abbott or the Indian generic drug maker Matrix Laboratories, via the Clinton Foundation. Aluvia is a heat-stable form of Kaletra. Meanwhile, the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation (GPO), manufacturer of the local anti-Aids drug GPO-VIR, yesterday filed a libel charge against USA for Innovation at Bang Rak police station. GPO board chairman Vichai Chokewiwat said the libel charge was filed on the grounds that the US firm's printed advertisements were damaging to the GPO and its products. The adverts had shattered the confidence of doctors and patients subscribing to GPO's medicines, he added. The full-page advertisements in English claimed GPO-VIR was a copy of an HIV treatment, claiming a study by Mahidol University showed a high resistance rate of 39.6-58% among users. The GPO says the resistance rate is much lower, about 20%. Abbott backs off, wants to continue sale of Aids drug- May 15, 2007 Abbott Laboratories, one of the three pharmaceutical giants whose drugs face compulsory licensing in Thailand, has backed off from its threats, saying it wants to continue selling its HIV/Aids drugs here. Previously, the firm planned to withhold sale of a heat-stable form of Aluvia, its HIV/Aids drug, as punishment for Thailand's compulsory licensing policy. Representatives of Abbott made the company's stance known yesterday while meeting with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) secretary-general Siriwat Tiptaradol. The FDA also met with representatives from Sanofi-Aventis yesterday. Abbott's new offer was made on condition that Thailand would not impose compulsory licensing on Aluvia and that the price of the drug, at 3,488.20 baht per person per month, or about 34,000 baht (US$1,000) per person per year, would not come down any further. Dr Siriwat said the FDA would forward Abbott's offer to Public Health Minister Mongkol Na Songkhla. Abbott's Aluvia price will be compared with the prices quoted by India's generic drug maker, Matrix Laboratories, which produces a generic version of Aluvia at 24,324 baht (US$695) per person per year (or 2,027 baht per person per month). Matrix made the offer to Thailand and 66 other countries which have agreed to purchase the generic drug, together with the US-based Clinton Foundation. On the two-hour negotiations with Sanofi-Aventis which holds the patent for the heart disease drug Plavix, Dr Siriwat said the drug giant proposed a one-year project to give patients greater access to the medicine. During the one-year period, the firm would make available 3.4 million tablets of Plavix to 34,000 patients. The scheme would automatically reduce Plavix's price from 90 baht to about 27 baht per tablet. The FDA will forward Sanofi-Aventis' offer to the health minister, said Dr Siriwat. He added that his committee will invite the pharmaceutical firms to discuss prices again on June 1. Meanwhile, Vichai Chokewiwat, chairman of the Public Health Ministry's panel on compulsory licensing, said that if the Public Health Ministry chose to buy drugs at prices higher than offered by other sources, it must be able to give the public a good reason to justify its decision. "If we buy the drug [the generic version of Aluvia] from India at US$695 per person per year, next time, we might get the drug at a lower price, probably as low as US$500. If we buy it from the US firm at US$1,000 now, we might have to continue buying it at US$1,000 forever."
|