Karenina.it
- Poesia
POETRY AND PARTICIPATION
In Memoriam Edgardo Antonio Vigo
By Clemente Padín
Undoubtedly every work of art or poem needs the
involvement of a spectator or a reader. Umberto Eco (1984) acknowledges this
fact. If ambiguity, that is, the diversity of meanings in a work of art is the
key that defines precisely its artistic quality, then every work is necessarily
"open" in the sense that it offers a variety of interpretative
options. This is so in every case as long as the work is sound, that is, keeps
being true to itself. This is possible because every person interprets
according to his own background of knowledge and experience, thus the variety
of interpretations. Nevertheless, Eco points out the existence of two types of
works of art. On the one hand there are ones which:
…offer
us an "opening" based on a theoretical,
mental collaboration of the user, who
must interpret an artistic fact already made,
already organised according to its own structural plenitude (even though it has
been structured to have ambiguous interpretations).
On the other hand there is:
…a
more restrained category of works of art that because of their capacity to
assume a variety of unforeseen structures, physically not yet carried out, we
could define them as "developing works of art".
As we will see a good part of the
Latin-American experimental poetic production, according to Eco's
characterisation, would fall into this category of " developing works of
art".
We can date the origins of this phenomenon in
around 1956 when the first exhibitions of Concrete Poetry took place in San
Pablo and Rio de Janeiro. Here three movements converge. These were explored by
Alvaro de Sá: namely the Noigandres group of San Pablo known for its structural
rigour; the spational-metaphysical language of Ferreira Gullar that would
evolve into Neoconcretism and the spational-mathematical language of Wlademir
Dias-Pino that would give place to the Semiotic Poem and the Process/Poem. In
the last two instances the "reader" must take a greater part in the
poetic process.
For Ferreira Gullar, theoretician on
Neoconcretism, the artistic object is an entheletical entity as long as it's
not made concrete as a perceived object, a "nâo-objeto". In other
words, as long as the poem isn't read or consumed it doesn't exist. The
participation of the reader in relation to the poem is imperative in order to
make the communication possible: for it to occur the reader must
"act" upon the text. For it to occur the neoconcrete poets like
Ferreira Gullar, Theon Spanudis, Osmar Dillon and others use the object-poems
(poems where substituting the support is at odds with loosing the information),
objects shaped as books or boxes where the folds, the uneven pages, the
colours, the holes, superpositions, etc., act like triggers of the poetic
information. Hence, when Ferreira Gullar encourages the reader to update and to
be co-author of the poem while at the same time establishes the temporary
duration as a privileged instance where the transcendental experience of the
non-object is decided upon, he is forging the grounds of the art and poetry of
the years to follow, especially, the tendencies Conceptualism would make
popular.
OSMAR DILLON: Unfolding Object-Poem
Wlademir Dias-Pino who encouraged the
spational-mathematical trend in Concrete Poetry, in 1956 had already proposed
works of this type like the object-poem "A Ave", a book that can only
be "read" if it's handled, in other words, if the "reader"
works directly on the pages searching for the information embodied in the text.
It's about a poem where the physical quality of the paper, its texture, its
transparency, its accidents (holes and rugged surfaces) and the various
possibilities of combining texts (in the turning and interchangeability of its
pages) demand an active and attentive sort of reader. It not only indicates a
total break from the Noigandres trends and the Neoconcrete tendency of Ferreira
Gullar, at the heart of Concrete Poetry, by defining the poem as a physical
object (not abstract), but it also represents a formal step forward as it
widens the field of reception. In other words it demands a real and social
involvement (not just abstract and individual) from the recipient.
WLADEMIR DIAS-PINO:
SOLIDA,1956
Almost in the same sense the poem SOLIDA, by Dias-Pino, that was shown in the first Concrete Poetry exhibitions,
not only made possible the semiotic transposition of the verbal characters used
in the poem, but it also called on the reader to take part by offering him the
opportunity of "remaking" the poem according to the sign system of
the language he chooses or is able to use for creating his own version.
WLADEMIR DIAS-PINO:
SOLIDA, spatial version, 1962
The poem SOLIDA, as a result of its spatial formulations, made possible the
materialisation of the Semiotic Poem, developed later in 1962 by Dias-Pino, and
afterwards, in 1964, by the Brazilian poets Decio Pignatari and Luis Angelo
Pinto in 1965. The Semiotic Poem substitutes the meanings of words for
geometric shapes. The shapes are shown together with their corresponding
meanings in a "lexical key" or "dictionary" and the new
visual language proposed is revealed. The configuration or formations of shapes
constitute the poetic texts to be read.
Semiotic
Poem: LUIS ANGELO PINTO
The next step was to displace the verbal
language from its privileged position ( as the only source of the poetic
expression) and to let all the languages ( including the verbal language) carry
this weight. Here also the participation of the "creative-reader" is
decisive. In the following Semiotic Poem by Neide Sá, belonging to the second
stage of this movement, the elements of translating code not only define the
icons but also participate in the text:
Semiotic
Poem: NEIDE SA
On the one hand the linguistic code shown
imposes a certain reading, but the reader by handling and modifying the direction
of the shapes, also changes their meaning and hence the text. On the other hand
we notice how certain expressions that wouldn't be appropriate linguistically,
for example the conjunction between "know", "taste" and
"life", that would give us the expression "know taste life"
has no specific formulation in verbal language, but does acquire it on the
visual language level. The meaning of the poem depends on the active
participation of the "reader".
Towards 1967 with the creation of the Process/Poem,
a natural outcome of the Semiotic Poem, was officially integrated within the
scope of formal trends entitled "the version", in other words, the
creation of the poem by the reader operating on the "matrix" or poem
project in accordance with a repertoire of knowledges.
The version appears as a solution to the
consuming of the traditional work of art (an expression of privileges) and lets
the "reader" operate on the poem that is proposed, himself creating
different versions. Now the poet, like an architect, only needs to describe
visually or in writing the project of the poem leaving its materialisation on
the "reader's" hands. Clearly the reading of the "project",
via the "reader's" participation, will generate the corresponding
"versions" according to the materials of a given place and time. This
allows the poet to "update" the poem without fear of the advances in
new technologies, inevitably brought about by scientific development, hindering
its materialisation.
NEIDE SA: Transparencies
These
formal advances of the Brazilian avant-guard poetry had an enormous influence
on every sphere of art, poetry and its related disciplines. Thus in Argentina,
Edgardo Antonio Vigo, who after addressing the Process/Poem as a "poetry
to be built", in other words, a poetic that demands the participation of
the reader although he follows the instructions of a "programme" or a
"projector of the process", goes a step forward by admitting a
programme that gives determined instructions (signals or clues) to the reader
and he, the real "builder of the poem", will be the one who gives
life to the poem. In his own words Vigo says, "…the possibility of art is not only in the observer's
participation but on his active building." (1970).
The new "reader" or "true
creator" receives a changeable project through his creative involvement.
These ideas materialised on the 30th September 1970 in the Hall of the State
University, Montevideo, Uruguay in the Exhibitions of the Avant-guard Editions,
where the work of Edgardo Antonio Vigo "Demagogical Poem" was carried
out. To each participant a form was given with the project to be carried out:
"Write,
keeping anonymous, a phrase, phoneme, symbol or visual sign (etc.) which you
can't do without in a poem in the blank space provided. Make a cylinder and
introduce it into the BALLOT BOX Nº 1. You will receive a certification of your
vote in the shape of a large card which you must hung onto your lapel. Thank
you."
In this way each participant, having previously
acted onto the blank space in the form, would introduce them into a special
ballot box with a circular hole (not quadrangular like the regular ballot
boxes). The day's proceedings were brought to an end by Clemente Padín's work "Poetry
must be made by everyone". In this work the participants had to work on a
blackboard where coloured ribbons and white cards hang; each participant was
given a handout where the following was indicated:
"INSTRUCTIONS:
write an infinitive verb that expresses your present need for action on a white
card. Then pin it wherever you think convenient, so that the verb is covered by
the coloured ribbon. When the poem has been completed the organisers will fix
the white card horizontally in such a way that it can be read and the coloured
ribbons are hanging. In this way there will be an indication of your concerns
at a collective level and the plastic concretion of the poem that together with
the others you have helped to create."
Now the consumer creates actively according to
a project. However, he doesn't create individually according to a version
resulting from his lone act of consuming but he does so collectively. From the
expectations of Concrete Poetry and Visual Poetry moving on to the
creative-building of the Poem to be Carried Out. The modification acts on the
mode of the artistic production and therefore on the mode of consumption.
"The deepest activating of the individual: his own making of the
poem".
The essential proposal is on the modus
operandi, the mode of production and consumption, not on the work or product
itself, which doesn't obstacle the work of art from suffering alterations in
unpredictable ways due to the unfolding of the mode of production (1971).
Vigo sheds light over the matter by stating in
his note to the Expo/International Proposals to be Carried Out in the Centre of
Arts and Communications (CAYC)
from Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1971:
"Next
18th June this exhibition will be opened. It will present all those modern day
experiences that have been carried out by artists that come from the field of
Visual or Sound Poetry. Individual searches at an international level have lead
to the constant reactivating of these two fields and have abandoned (almost
entirely) the treatment of the poem at a visual level as well as the
traditional spaces in their presentation (exhibitions) and their layout (book).
The experiences gained permit their present PROPOSAL. Having come to the point where the freeing of the
fields which the traditional arts had divided into genres without endorsing a WHOLE ART, the POETIC RESEARCHES have been kept within the
mentioned field because it stems from all of them that imponderable and
undefinable "mystery to be deciphered" as well as their features of a
"contemporary romanticism" defined in relation to its form and
conjugated in a different way. The exhibition has been organised by Edgardo
Antonio Vigo with the direct collaboration of Elena Pelli (Resistence/Chaco)
and Clemente Padín (Montevideo/R.O. del Uruguay). To keep a coherence within
the presentations of the projects and their taking place, the display has began
with the PROCESS/POETRY, movement that in Brazil
breaks with the hegemony that up to 1969 had been kept by the NOIGANDRES GROUP (of CONCRETE POETRY) from Sao Paulo. The PROCESS/POETRY brings the possibility of a
novelty for the observer who can ACTIVELY PARTICIPATE by using "MINIMAL CLUES" so as to give form
and partial or definite content to the given poem. To this it is also added the
possibility of a CONSTANT MODIFICATION of the results (because of
the intensification of the audience and individual participation) that turns it
into a "NEVER-ENDING" poem. Subsequently a
world-wide current emerges where the poetic researches are proposed but not
carried out. Up to this point it becomes a definite and necessary result the
interchanging of ideas, concepts and PROJECTS and the freeing ourselves of the POETIC OBJECT (dear to the surrealists
and their variant POETRY/OBJECT and proposed by the first
theoretical notes of the process/poetry
- WLADEMIR DIAS-PINO -) . The
carrying out of the projected work can be undertaken by a society which is
totally alien to the designer or researcher."
Moreover
we find this passage from the note by Edgardo Antonio Vigo (1971) where his
project A VISUAL WALK ALONG THE PLAZA RUBEN DARIO is described:
"A large card indicating a MINIMAL CLUE and an element (that can be
substituted), invites us to carry out an action that we can simply replace by
another. The carrying out of our OWN ACTION is based on the particular
reading. Let us explain: we take a piece of chalk, mark a cross (or any other
geometric centre or not), inside that centre or surrounding it make a rotation
of 360º (that can be less or plural), add a variant in relation with the
horizon which itself may be varied by standing on tiptoes or in a crouching
position (why not lower our bodies and literally lay down on the ground?), with
any of these possibilities and their execution you have made A VISUAL WALK
ALONG THE PLAZA RUBEN DARIO (designer: E.A.V., Bs. Aires, CAYC, 1970). The non existence
of the work of art, the non necessity of its presence, the ephemeral quality of
being, the open possibility of MATERIALISING different ACTIONS to the ones proposed makes
us all MAKERS (that is traditionally: CREATORS) of situations and not
consumers digitised aprioristically"
(PlazaRubendario)
EDGARDO ANTONIO VIGO:
"A visual walk
along the plaza Ruben Dario", Buenos Aires, 1970.
The
ideas by Clemente Padín had already been embodied in some of the works
published by the Uruguayan magazine OVUM 10, for example, " Gastou, Gastou" and "In Hoc Signo
Vinces" where the reader was encouraged to act upon the poems. Therefore,
in 1971, Padín gave shape to a poetry based on the action that he named
Non-Object Poetry. It must be kept in mind, that during those years (by the end
of the 60's) a deep questioning of the language foundations, principally the
written language arose. It was considered to be the source of all the
informational deformation represented through ideology, and yet another agent
for the enslavement and control of society. Hence, it wasn't strange that
Padín's proposal tried utopically to leave behind the language of
"representation", a characteristic of the written and other
languages, that established their meanings conventionally by social agreement.
He proposed a language of the "action" whose signs "would
transmit by acting". In other words, it proposed to substitute the signifiers
for actions and the signified for the consequences of the actions and the
meanings they conveyed. Of course, in this particular language, only by virtue
of "doing", the "makers of texts", would be taking part,
while creating at the same time the "action poem". The weak point in
this proposal, as it was recognised by the same Padín (1975), is that for
communication to take place languages must exist and the "actions"
had not yet been taken catalogued or conventionalised up to the point where
each could be attributed a meaning (except for a reduced number to which by
tradition a meaning has been given, for example, to give flowers as a present
would mean "love", etc.). Furthermore the "readings" of the
actions had to be adjusted according to the degree in which they affected the
interests of the "readers" depending, not only on their repertory but
also on their social expectations.
(Gastou)
CLEMENTE PADÍN: " Gastou, Gastou", 1971.
Gesture/Hyper-Textual/ Sound Poetry to Build and/or to
Carry Out
We
had to wait until 1996 to find "the beyond" of the proposals of the
60's with its poetry centred on the participation of the reader. An Argentine
poet, Fabio Doctorovich from the Paralenguas Group, from Buenos Aires, while
putting to work the dynamics of the new means, offers the "reader/active
participant" the possibility of expressing himself through a variety of
means: sounds, gestures, movement, etc., widening the sphere of the expressive
possibilities. After recognising the contributions of Vigo and Dias-Pino and
analysing the mono-conceptuality from nearly all of the poetic production from
the 20th century, in other words, the decoding through only just one channel,
he proposes a plurality of ways of expression, the Multi-conceptual poem, as it
has, on the other hand, been taken on board by the present experimental
Latin-American poetry in using all the language dimensions, not only on the
semantic plane but also the phonic, visual and performative, etc.
On
his theoretical formulation, Doctorovich mentions the following (1998):
"Carrying out the Multiconcept could result in
the creation of works that employ a diversity of components (textual, visual,
phonic, etc.) in separate interrelated parts that assemble as a modular
structure. Each module, differently from the multimedia or the audio-visual
means, wouldn't necessarily be represented simultaneously with the others.
This would give the modular work the characteristic of
a "work to be build" because the reader is able to arrange the
modules in a variety of possible sequences or to add his own modules, producing
a multiplicity of readings.
With the purpose of making the work a unique whole
(although divisible) and not the mere sum of its constituting parts, as well as
focusing on one or more common topics, the modules would possess parts that
function as pieces for fitting in, being the most obvious example of this the
intertextual technique where phrases in the module B that refer to the module A
would be employed."
(Fabio1)
FABIO DOCTOROVICH: Gesture/Hyper-textual poetry to Build and/or to Carry out 1.
PHASE
1:
Recite out loud and making pauses, following the direction indicated by the
arrows, according to the keys described to the left of the poem.
As
we have seen, the poem can be divided into components that depend on the
dimension of language that is considered (semantic, visual, phonic, etc.). The
difficulty lies in the fact on how we will be able to reassemble those modules
in a unique entity. In a verbal poem the solution is given, mainly, by the
copulative conjunctions; in the visual poem by its own space; in the phonic
poem by time; etc. In Doctorovich's proposal the modules get
"embedded" according to "hyperpostypographical" as he calls
it.
In
other words, the audience (the embedders) not only fills each module with
meaning, but articulates it with the whole. Finally, the last turn of the
screw, the work stops being a definitive entity, because:
"The initial designer must busy himself with
sketching a plane ( bi-, tri-, or n- dimensional) of the work that serves as a
guide for further authors while at the same time he has to indicate the spaces
to be filled (modules or fragments to be carried out)."
In
this way, the work becomes a dynamic entity, constituted by assembled pieces
that can be embedded or not, a piacere.
Also
the concept "work of art" would disappear, for now we would be in the
presence of "a metamorphic, gelatinous form, a kind of "blob"
made up of real and virtual materials."
We
don't forget the influence of the means, mainly, computing, in Doctorovich's
proposal. To adequate the expressive instruments to the present time, is
undoubtedly a challenge the poet will never walk away from. Moreover the
devices have always been "contaminated" and had an influence on the
forms. For that reason, the technological progress, principally, on the field
of the expression and the communications has always caused formal changes, be
it on the works themselves (when information is added), or be it on the
characteristics or features of the consumption.
(Fabio2)
FABIO DOCTOROVICH: Gesture/Hyper-textual poetry to Build and/or to Carry out 2.
PHASE 2: RECITE OUT LOUD AND MAKE THE GESTURES INDICATED.
The
new is born from the old (an obvious truth!). From the statement "all that
is made by a human being can be art" by Duchamp to Cage's "all that
can be heard can be music" and Beuys asseveration that "everyone can
be an artist", all converges on the great contribution of the historical
avant-gardes, above all of the Dadaists': "art is life". For life is
a dialogue, it is communication, it is social production.
When
artists and poets propose the participation as consubstantial to art and
poetry, they are doing nothing else but reaffirming the premises by which art
is freed from its condition of merchandise or an exclusive consumption product,
subject to market forces.
When
proposing the responsibility of the finished product on the
"active-consumer", the artist is returning art to its first social
function, to the usage area: a product (not necessarily material) that
expresses symbolically their urges and needs ("Poetry must be made by
everyone", Count Lautrèamont). The participation of the reader has been
the subtle thread that has united each poem and every proposal of
Latin-American poetry during the second half of the 20th century and
undoubtedly, the new means, mainly electronic ones, will do nothing but
encourage development through the interaction they make possible.
Bibliography
CIRNE,
MOACY Vanguarda: un Projeto Semiologico, Vozes, Petropolis, Brasil, 1975
DE
SA, ALVARO Vanguarda: Produto de Comunicaçao, Vozes, Petropolis, Brasil,
1977
DIAS-
PINO, WLADEMIR A Ave, Ed. Igrejinha, Cuiabá, Brasil, 1956.
----------------------------------Solida,
Ed. del autor, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil,1962.
----------------------------------Processo:
Linguagem e Comunicaçao, Vozes, Petropolis,Brasil,1971.
DOCTOROVICH,
FABIO ENCAszTERS, en catálogo de VI Bienal Internacional de Poesía
Experimental, Sección Cono Sur Latinoamericano, Montevideo, Uruguay, 1998.
ECO,
UMBERTO Obra Abierta, Planeta-Agostini, Madrid, España, 1984
FERREIRA-GULLAR
Teoria del Nao-Objeto, en Suplemento de Jornal do Brasil, Rio de
Janeiro, Brasil, 1959.
PADIN,
CLEMENTE De la Representation a l´Action, Ed. Polaires, Marsella,
Francia, 1975.
PIGNATARI,
DECIO Entrevista en Correio da Manha, 21 de Agosto de 1965.
PIGNATARI,
DECIO y AUGUSTO y HAROLDO de CAMPOS Plan
Piloto para la Poesía Concreta. En revista Noigrandes, nr. 2, Sao Paulo,
Brasil,1958.
VIGO,
EDGARDO ANTONIO De la Poesía/Proceso a la Poesía para y/o a Realizar,
Diagonal Cero, La Plata, Argentina, 1970.
---------------------------------------La
Calle: escenario del arte actual,
revista OVUM 10, nro. 6,1971, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Translator:
Paula Einoder-Boxer