next up previous
Next: Bibliography Up: Constant Bandwidth vs Proportional Previous: Simulation results

   
Conclusions

We presented two different approaches to soft real-time scheduling: the well known Proportional Share Resource Allocation and the Constant Bandwidth Resource Allocation. We compared by simulations some Proportional Share schedulers with our Constant Bandwidth scheduler, showing how at a cost of a smaller fairness, CBS generates a minor number of context switches, resulting in a more efficient scheduling. Moreover, CBS does not generate any CPU waste when hard real-time tasks are present in the system, so it is more appropriate to support multimedia tasks in time-dependent applications.




1999-02-16