Bangl@news |
|
Year XII Nr. 537 Sep. 5, 12 |
|
UN disappointed over lack of agreement on arms treaty
SouthAsia OneWorld – July 30, 2012
Describing
it as a ‘setback,’ Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has expressed his
disappointment over the failure by United Nations Member States to reach
agreement on a treaty that would regulate the conventional arms trade.“I am
disappointed that the Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) concluded its
four-week-long session without agreement on a treaty text that would have set
common standards to regulate the international trade in conventional arms,”
Mr. Ban said.“The Conference's inability to conclude its work on this
much-awaited ATT, despite years of effort of Member States and civil society
from many countries, is a setback,” he added. Ending on Friday without
agreement, the four-week long Conference brought together the UN's 193 Member
States to negotiate what is seen as the most important initiative ever regarding
conventional arms regulation within the United Nations. According to media
reports, some countries had indicated they needed more time to consider the
issues. Despite the lack of agreement, in his statement, Mr. Ban said that he
was encouraged that the ATT process was not over, with States having agreed to
continue pursuing “this noble goal.”“There is already considerable common
ground and States can build on the hard work that has been done during these
negotiations,” Mr. Ban said, while also noting that his commitment to the
pursuit of “a robust ATT is steadfast.”
“A strong treaty would rid the world of the appalling human cost of the poorly regulated international arms trade,” the Secretary-General said. “It would also enhance the ability of the United Nations to cope with the proliferation of arms.”At the end of 2010, an estimated 27.5 million people were internally displaced as a result of conflict, while millions more have sought refuge abroad. In many cases, the armed violence that drove them from their homes was fuelled by the widespread availability and misuse of weapons.I n his statement, the UN chief also commended the President of the ATT Conference, Ambassador Roberto Garcia Moritán of Argentina, for his persistence and skilful leadership of the process. In February, the heads of several UN agencies – including the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) – called for a comprehensive arms trade treaty that requires States to assess the risk that serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law may be committed with weapons being transferred; includes within its scope all conventional weapons, including small arms; and ensures that there are no loopholes by covering all types of transfers, including activities such as transit, trans-shipment, as wells as loans and leases.
Aid
Policy - New words, old challenges
Irinnews - Gorgol/Johannesburg - July 30, 2012
Spending
aid money on social initiatives like communal bore-wells, which affect and
protect everyone’s lives, especially the poorest, will make people more
resilient to climatic and economic shocks, says a new report. This is probably a
truth as old as development science itself, but a fresh coat of paint and the
use of new terms like “resilience” might revive interest in these vital
issues. The report, Ending the Everyday Emergency, commissioned by NGOs Save the
Children and World Vision and compiled by Peter Gubbels, tries to assess the
progress, lessons learned, and challenges of promoting "resilience" in
the Sahel. Such initiatives are needed all over, but are few and far between.
Money spent on a bore-well, vegetable seeds, basic gardening skills and access
to a communal patch of land near the water point in Diaout, a village in the
Gorgol region of Mauritania, where most families cannot afford to eat more than
once a day, has helped them withstand the drought that has killed animals and
destroyed crops in their neighbourhood. The villagers want access to more land,
and a water pump to draw water from the Senegal River, a few kilometres from
Diaout, because they realize they can grow more food and sell what they don’t
need. This initiative was set up by Oxfam, which is trying to extend the project
to more villages but are stretched for cash. The Gorgol, Brakna and Assaba
regions form Mauritania’s Triangle of Poverty, where at least 60 percent of
the people live on less than one US dollar a day. Gubbels said the chronically
food insecure population usually does not benefit from development, "and
only gets enough support from humanitarian action to avoid famine - they do not
get long-term support to get out of the debt-hunger trap." The lack of
protection for such families has been dubbed the "resilience deficit",
and has driven millions unable to cope with shocks into chronic hunger - at
least 18 million have been affected by the food crisis brought by drought in the
Sahel. "The current paradigm of development... [is based on the assumption
that] increasing the overall supply of food will create jobs for 'unproductive'
peasant farmers and also reduce food prices," Gubbels said. “I am not
against investing in overall agriculture, and economic growth spurred by
agriculture. But in the context of the Sahel, I argue that economic growth is
leaving rising numbers of highly food insecure families and malnourished
children - economic growth in the Sahel was over five percent in 2011, but we
see increased vulnerability and malnutrition." Even in a
"non-crisis" year, an estimated 645,000 children in the Sahel die of
largely preventable and treatable causes, and 226,000 of these deaths can be
directly linked to malnutrition, the report said. "Acute malnutrition
affects 10 percent to 14 percent of children in Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, Niger
and Burkina Faso, and more than 15 percent of children in Chad." He
suggested increased investment in social transfers - like communal bore-wells,
seeds, and more inclusive extension services that filter down to the most
vulnerable. Each actor has to think not only about their own work, but about how
all the other actors fit together, so that impact on the ground becomes the
centre of analysis, and not each person's pet projetNew words, old challenges
There is not much to disagree with what Gubbels and the report are saying, said
Simon Levine, an aid expert at the Overseas Development Institute, a UK-based
think-tank. And the critique that interventions related to improving food
security and livelihood needs are a development failure is "nothing
new" - just that it is being called a "resilience deficit - but
absolutely no less important for restating”, he noted.“If the new language
helps to get attention with a wider development audience, then I have no
problems at all. They [the report and its author] are 100 percent right that the
challenges in the Sahel are not really about how to respond to crises, but how
to prevent them." The report also suggests harnessing "small-scale
agriculture for resilience", which… "will need careful
operationalization if it is not to sit uncomfortably with the critique that too
much attention has been paid to food production at the expense of other factors
creating vulnerability". Levine said all aid agencies need to change their
development planning [to] a strategic approach "that is not a jargon change
- that's a very significant change indeed. Each actor has to think not only
about their own work, but about how all the other actors fit together, so that
impact on the ground becomes the centre of analysis, and not each person's pet
project."
Arms
treaty, failure of negotiations puts pressure on great powers
Misna - July 30, 2012
Four
weeks of negotiations have failed to produce an agreement for the drafting and
adoption of a treaty regulating the trade in conventional arms (ATT Arms Trade
Treaty). “The inability of the Conference of New York to finish its work on
the much anticipated Act, despite years of efforts made by UN member countries
and civil society in many nations, is a defeat,” said United Nations Secretary
General, Ban Ki-moon. The negotiations ended last Friday and according to
representatives from NGOs who followed them, in the end the vested interests of
some powerful nations – the United States, Russia and China in particular –
prevailed. “With one person dying every minute due to armed violence, it
should be imperative for the most powerful nations to take the lead. President
Obama instead requested more time to reach an agreement. But how long is
needed?” Asked Salil Shetty, Secretary General of Amnesty International.
“These
negotiations – said Shetty – have been an uncomfortable test for world
leaders. Thw powerful few failed to disengage from their positions choosing
instead to pursue a policy of national political interests. This minority may
well have turned their backs to the world, but it cannot for much longer. The
majority of governments which demand a strong ATT must continue now to exert
pressure so that an agreement might be reached this year.
“The
Control Arms campaign – which includes several non-governmental organizations
– has in turn emphasized its position expressing it in a joint statement from
90 nations which claimed to be bitter but not discouraged”, determined to
achieve a treaty promptly. According to Control Arms it is necessary to start
from the position adopted by these countries in order to achieve a breakthrough.
Tribe, land and politics - Africa's toxic mix
by Peter Greste
Al Jazeera - July 31, 2012
A
wiser journalist that I once knew gave me a piece of advice, saying:
"Beware of simple explanations for complex problems."It is a bit of
wisdom that has proved profoundly true for the crisis that emerged on the
Kenya-Ethiopia border over the past week.On Friday, fighting between two ethnic
groups – the Borana and the Garre – erupted on the Ethiopian side of Moyale,
a town that straddles the frontier.The brief but savage battle killed at least
18 people, and wounded a dozen more (the fact that so many more people died than
were injured points to the ferocity of the fighting). More than 30,000 people
fled over the border to take shelter in Kenya.The obvious and easy explanation
is that it was a battle over land. The two tribes have competing claims over a
stretch of territory in Ethiopia's arid southeast corner, and an ongoing drought
has added pressure to the already scarce grazing land.Neither the Borana nor
Garre refugees could agree on who started the fighting, or what triggered it.
Power-vacuum
The
Borana, who had crammed into the dusty Somare Primary School, a few hundred
metres south of the border, said the Garre attacked with weapons the government
had given them to fight off an insurgency by ethnic Somalis.Across town, in
another school, the Garre said another group of separatists linked to the Borana
had taken advantage of an apparent power-vacuum in Addis Ababa to launch their
offensive.But in a rare moment of consensus, when I asked the respective
community elders what lay behind the crisis, all agreed that it was a problem of
politics and not tribe.One Borana elder, Kefiyalewu Tikku, described it as a
failure of governance, saying: "This business of tribe can be
managed."We always had our traditional ways of solving our problems, but
the central government (in Addis Ababa) has used a policy of 'divide-and-rule'
to keep us marginalised."The government here is very weak, and so they use
it to control us."In a way, that is encouraging. Tribe is, after all, an
immutable characteristic in Africa. You can't change your tribe any more than
you can change the colour of your blood, so any "tribal conflict" is
by definition almost unsolvable.Describing a conflict as "tribal" also
avoids the problem of assigning responsibility. It blames an entire ethnic
community for the sins of a few protagonists.
Convenient
diversion
And
so, as is often the case in Africa, tribe becomes a convenient diversion from
the deeper political malaise that seems to drive so many conflicts here.In the
case of Ethiopia, human rights groups and ethnic minorities have repeatedly
accused Prime Minister Meles Zenawi of trying to centralise power in Addis
Ababa, at the expense of ethnic minorities who live on the fringes of this vast,
and incredibly diverse country.That neglect has spawned separatist movements in
the east and the south, and it is no coincidence that Moyale, where the latest
fighting erupted, sits on the faultline that separates those two restive
regions.Anyone who doubts this need only look over the border in Kenya. Both
Borana and Garre live on this side of Moyale too, yet literally a few metres
south of the frontier beacons that dot their way through town, there is no
fighting.The geography and the ethnic mix are the same. The only difference is
the way politics is done.That's not to suggest the Kenyans are immune from
manipulating tribe for political ends though. The last time the Garre and Borana
fought was in 2008, when Kenya last held its elections.So, the solution to the
fighting between the two ethnic groups is not to change genetics; it is to
improve the way they are governed.Of course, that needs courage and commitment
by political leaders to sit down and discuss the problems that create friction
in the first place.At the moment, that is not on anyone's agenda.
Political
Murders - It's About the Dough by Genevieve Quintal
Allafrica - Johannesburg - July 29, 2012
Political killings in South Africa are not about political dominance but
about getting to the trough first."Some of these guys literally come out of
severe poverty and if they get kicked out they will be back there." said
deputy CEO of the SA Institute of Race Relations Frans Cronje."The stakes
are high... it's about money."The number of politicians murdered the past
five years has escalated, especially between 2010 and 2012.KwaZulu-Natal and
Mpumalanga seem to be the worst affected -- with 41 and five killed
respectively.Around the country, at least 46 officials from various political
parties have been gunned down around the country.Cronje said: "Yes South
Africa is a democracy... but I can't think of another country that has this
problem."We [the institute] have been hard pressed to find a single person
killed over an idea. It all depends on tenders and corruption."He said the
issue had been swept under the carpet for far too long and was something that
would become very controversial in the next five years.Historically,
KwaZulu-Natal has been a test-bed since the late 80s, and to this day it is
still seen as a political killing ground.ANC KwaZulu-Natal secretary Sihle
Zikalala said the party had quite a few officials killed in the last two years,
but was difficult to pinpoint motives."We have called for serious
interventions to crack all these cases. It's destabilising the
party."Zikalala said the ANC did not want to accuse another political
party, especially not before a full investigation was conducted.IFP MP Albert
Mncwango said political tension in KwaZulu-Natal was because of the IFP
breakaway group the National Freedom Party.Mncwango said quite a number of
councillors in his party had been killed the past five years."A rough
figure, which is subject to verification, is around 10. We believe it was always
politically motivated," he said."They took place especially around the
Natal Midlands and these murders escalated when there were internal ructions
which gave rise to the NFP."Former IFP chairwoman Zanele Magwaza-Msibi and
her backers launched the new opposition to the IFP in January 2011.The NFP has
said 22 of its members have been murdered since its launch.Many of these murders
had been blamed on the IFP. Mncwango said this was unfortunate."In all
their murders, that they say are politically motivated, I can't think of any IFP
member who has been apprehended."NFP general secretary Nhlanhla Khubisa
said the party had never blamed other political parties for the spate of
murders."We say its politically motivated because it started immediately
when the party was formed and of course in some cases there was some kind of
political intolerance."Khubisa did however say that it was not NFP members
killing other NFP members. "We a threat to somebody, somewhere."So is
political intolerance in South Africa too high?
According
to Zikalala it is."It is a problem and the problem of political
assassinations is a serious one," he said. Mncwango said there was a new
brand of political intolerance in the country. It was no longer about parties
defending their political strongholds."We have a new kind of political
intolerance which has to do with tenderpreneurship," he said."This is
becoming a huge influence in politics and a source of internal ructions in
parties."Because the IFP was not running government it did not hand out
tenders and so it had minimal infighting, said Mncwango. Zikalala said the
problem surrounding tenders could not be ruled out but that would form part of
the ANC's investigation into the reason for political murders.Khubisa said there
needed to be a change of mind set amongst members of political parties across
the political landscape."At some point some kind of political education is
needed across all parties," he said.Five politicians have also been
murdered in Mpumalanga since 2007.There have been allegations of a hit list
circulating in the province which had the names of provincial politicians on it.
The list apparently targeted people who stood in the way of access to 2010 Soccer World Cup tenders.It was said to be compiled, funded and executed by ANC members.Two people, Jimmy Mohlala and Sammy Mpatlanyane, whose names were on the alleged hit list, had been murdered in 2009 and 2010.Cronje concluded that ANC policy was killing off parts of the party."Look at the ANC... money has brought it to where it is."Material gain, said Cronje, went hand in hand with politics.T his was especially true in a country such as South Africa where the previously poor were now in power."The fight for tenders is desperate," Cronje said.
New
ICC prosecutor vows to focus on victims
Irinnews - London - July 30, 2012
That
a war crimes court should focus on the victims of war crimes sounds like a
simple concept.
But
many of those living in the African communities where most of the atrocities
being prosecuted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) took place, have long
complained they have been forgotten by this controversial and costly institution
based thousands of miles away.The new ICC prosecutor has pledged that victims -
particularly women and children - will be her priority, but analysts worry that
shrinking budgets could make her promises difficult to keep.Fatou Bensouda said
at her swearing-in speech in June that she would “focus on, and listen to, the
millions of victims who continue to suffer from massive crimes…“The return
on our investment for what others may today consider to be a huge cost for
justice is effective deterrence and saving millions of victims’ lives,” said
Bensouda as she took over the ICC’s highest profile job from Luis
Moreno-Ocampo. Gambia’s former justice minister and attorney-general served
more than eight years as Ocampo’s deputy.Sunil Pal, head of the legal section
at the Coalition for the ICC, an advocacy organization comprising 2,500 civil
society groups in 150 countries, expects Bensouda to bring her own unique
approach to the role of prosecutor. He welcomes her diplomatic style and focus
on victims.“The tone is very positive [with Bensouda],” he said. “There is
a real emphasis on working with victims and ensuring that the process is
meaningful for the direct beneficiaries of this process - the victims. It is
about recognizing the importance that victims play in this process and an
acknowledgement and strengthening of that role.”On paper at least the ICC is
the most victim-friendly of all the international tribunals. Court-recognized
victims are given lawyers and allowed to participate throughout a trial,
including by questioning witnesses. Those who have suffered injury or harm from
a crime for which someone is convicted are also eligible for restitution,
compensation or rehabilitation. The reparations process is now under way in the
Thomas Lubanga case, the only trial completed during Ocampo’s nine-year reign,
but awards are many months away. Lubanga was a Congolese militia leader
convicted of recruiting children.It is up to the court’s registry and judges
rather than the prosecutor to explain the reparations procedure to victims. But
analysts say it is Bensouda who should take responsibility for improving
communications with victims who have often complained about the lack of
information coming from the Hague-based court about the trials.“There has been
a general insufficiency of information being passed to victims which leads to
certain perceptions of how the court works which may be false,” said Carla
Ferstman, director of Redress, a human rights group working with war crimes
victims. “It’s not only about bad practices of the prosecutor, it’s about
practices that are misunderstood.“Bensouda does have a role in reaching out
and bringing victims in. She should see them as her stakeholders. These are
constituents she should be working with and getting on board.”The ICC’s
focus on African cases has been controversial and has led to charges of bias
from the court’s vocal critics on the continent where cooperation has been
patchy at best. Eleven ICC arrest warrants for African accused remain
outstanding. Pal believes that by placing an emphasis on the importance of
victims, Bensouda will bring greater relevance to the work of the ICC in the
places it is investigating.“Communications is [a] priority, ensuring the
process is relevant and meaningful for victims and communicating, educating and
informing victims around its decision-making process, particularly in the case
of preliminary examinations,” he said. “This is about creating
environments that are conducive to facilitating the court's work in-country,
which will help them get buy-in and counteract accusations of bias.”
Reduced
budget
But
with a reduced 108 million euro budget this year and an ever increasing
caseload, the ICC could struggle to meet its obligations to stay in touch with
victims. States are pressuring the ICC to reduce its budget, which would impact
on victim participation and communication with those on the ground. “Outreach
to victims and affected communities presents unique challenges, which will only
become harder in the face of additional cuts,” said Pal. “These activities
are critical to ensuring that victims and victim communities understand what the
court is trying to achieve in their name. It's also critical to facilitating
their participation in proceedings, in terms of explaining their rights in the
ICC process.”
Kenya
Bensouda’s
task of improving relations in Africa could also be complicated by the upcoming
trials of four prominent Kenyans accused of orchestrating post-election violence
in 2007. The case has generated huge interest in Kenya where debate has raged
over whether the court is striking a blow for impunity or targeting innocent
victims.
Former
Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga’s conviction was the ICC’s first verdict
Nick Kaufman, a former ICC prosecutor turned defence lawyer who has represented
Congolese clients accused of war crimes, says negotiating a smooth prosecution
should be her main priority.
“I
think it is a good thing there is an African prosecutor in charge of the court
at the moment, because she will be able to bring her own cultural outlook to
bear in the case, especially when negotiating the minefield of Kenyan politics
which avidly follows the developments in the cases,” he said. “Hardly a day
goes by without some sort of reference to the cases in the Kenyan media.”
Lubanga
case
Elsewhere
in Africa, Bensouda will expected to explain to victims and others the recent
sentencing of the DRC’s Lubanga. Bensouda, a member of the prosecution team,
was in court on 10 July as judges sentenced the militia leader to 14 years while
praising him for enduring prosecution misdeeds during the trial which twice came
close to collapse. Reaction was mixed among victims, according to Bukeni Waruzi,
an expert on child soldiers and the programme manager for Africa and the Middle
East at the NGO Witness. “You have some who actually are happy that at
least he was sentenced,” said Waruzi. “But there are some who believe it
should be more. If he was prosecuted in DRC, with the gravity of the crimes, it
could have been more than 14 years.” Ocampo, in one of his final acts as
prosecutor, had asked for the maximum penalty of 30 years. However, with six
years already served, Lubanga could be out in less than eight. Kaufman says this
puts Bensouda in an awkward position with victims. “She is being forced to
defend a previous sentencing policy that was promoted mistakenly by her
predecessor - and I say mistakenly because it was completely wrong for the
prosecutor to ask for the maximum sentence, bar a life sentence, for a crime of
this nature,” said Kaufman.
He
expects a different ICC under Bensouda who endured a rocky start to her tenure
with the arrest by Libyan authorities of defence lawyer Melinda Taylor on
charges of spying for her client Saif al-Islam Gaddafi. “She is the complete
opposite of Ocampo. I don’t think we’ll see any of Ocampo’s antics with
Fatou - for example courting film stars and other totally irrelevant figures to
the conduct of international justice,” said Kaufman who also represents two of
Muammar Gaddafi’s children, Aisha and Saadi. “She will be far more
professional in her outlook. She’s a very competent orator and is also very
courteous and respectful.”
Taking
on too much?
Though
confidence in Bensouda is high, analysts worry she could be spreading herself
too thin.
The
ICC has14 cases before judges, ongoing investigations in seven countries and
preliminary investigations under way in countries including Afghanistan,
Colombia and Korea. On 18 July, Bensouda announced that the government of Mali
had asked for an investigation into violence which erupted there earlier this
year. “How many more situations can they take on?” said William Schabas, a
professor in international law at Middlesex University. “Have they taken
on already more than they can actually manage? You see how complicated this is.
Look at Lubanga - one trial chamber basically full time for four years and they
are not finished. They still haven’t done the reparations stuff.” Back in
the Congo, where new fighting alleged to have been orchestrated by ICC fugitive
Bosco Ntaganda has broken out, expectations that the new prosecutor can help end
the violence and impunity remain high. “There is a huge amount of expectations
- from victims, from activists, from everyone,” said Waruzi. “This will be a
challenge, how to meet those expectations while fulfilling her mandate.”
Allafrica - July 30, 2012
Spending
aid money on social initiatives like communal bore-wells, which affect and
protect everyone's lives, especially the poorest, will make people more
resilient to climatic and economic shocks, says a new report. This is probably a
truth as old as development science itself, but a fresh coat of paint and the
use of new terms like "resilience" might revive interest in these
vital issues.
The
report, Ending the Everyday Emergency, commissioned by NGOs Save the Children
and World Vision and compiled by Peter Gubbels, tries to assess the progress,
lessons learned, and challenges of promoting "resilience" in the
Sahel. Such initiatives are needed all over, but are few and far between.
Money
spent on a bore-well, vegetable seeds, basic gardening skills and access to a
communal patch of land near the water point in Diaout, a village in the Gorgol
region of Mauritania, where most families cannot afford to eat more than once a
day, has helped them withstand the drought that has killed animals and destroyed
crops in their neighbourhood.
The
villagers want access to more land, and a water pump to draw water from the
Senegal River, a few kilometres from Diaout, because they realize they can grow
more food and sell what they don't need. This initiative was set up by Oxfam,
which is trying to extend the project to more villages but are stretched for
cash. The Gorgol, Brakna and Assaba regions form Mauritania's Triangle of
Poverty, where at least 60 percent of the people live on less than one US dollar
a day. Gubbels said the chronically food insecure population usually does not
benefit from development, "and only gets enough support from humanitarian
action to avoid famine - they do not get long-term support to get out of the
debt-hunger trap." The lack of protection for such families has been dubbed
the "resilience deficit", and has driven millions unable to cope with
shocks into chronic hunger - at least 18 million have been affected by the food
crisis brought by drought in the Sahel. "The current paradigm of
development... [is based on the assumption that] increasing the overall supply
of food will create jobs for 'unproductive' peasant farmers and also reduce food
prices," Gubbels said.
"I
am not against investing in overall agriculture, and economic growth spurred by
agriculture. But in the context of the Sahel, I argue that economic growth is
leaving rising numbers of highly food insecure families and malnourished
children - economic growth in the Sahel was over five percent in 2011, but we
see increased vulnerability and malnutrition."
Even
in a "non-crisis" year, an estimated 645,000 children in the Sahel die
of largely preventable and treatable causes, and 226,000 of these deaths can be
directly linked to malnutrition, the report said. "Acute malnutrition
affects 10 percent to 14 percent of children in Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, Niger
and Burkina Faso, and more than 15 percent of children in Chad."
He
suggested increased investment in social transfers - like communal bore-wells,
seeds, and more inclusive extension services that filter down to the most
vulnerable.
New
words, old challenges
There
is not much to disagree with what Gubbels and the report are saying, said Simon
Levine, an aid expert at the Overseas Development Institute, a UK-based
think-tank. And the critique that interventions related to improving food
security and livelihood needs are a development failure is "nothing
new" - just that it is being called a "resilience deficit - but
absolutely no less important for restating", he noted. "If the new
language helps to get attention with a wider development audience, then I have
no problems at all. They [the report and its author] are 100 percent right that
the challenges in the Sahel are not really about how to respond to crises, but
how to prevent them."
The
report also suggests harnessing "small-scale agriculture for
resilience", which... "will need careful operationalization if it is
not to sit uncomfortably with the critique that too much attention has been paid
to food production at the expense of other factors creating vulnerability".
Levine
said all aid agencies need to change their development planning [to] a strategic
approach "that is not a jargon change - that's a very significant change
indeed. Each actor has to think not only about their own work, but about how all
the other actors fit together, so that impact on the ground becomes the centre
of analysis, and not each person's pet project."
Red Tide Rising
Daily
Star - July 25, 2012
Intolerance,
fuelled by a variety of causes, is leading to increasing violence worldwide
In
the wake of the most recent mass killing in the United States, several people
tweeted that they hoped the Colorado killer wasn’t a Muslim. Some asked on
email why James Holmes wasn’t being referred to as a “terrorist” instead
of as a “gunman”. Although the semantic difference means little to the
victims, the generally accepted meaning of a terrorist is somebody who targets
civilians indiscriminately to spread mayhem and fear. His purpose is to make a
political statement. A lone gunman, on the other hand, kills at random for
largely irrational, non-political reasons. Often, he is a lone wolf with
paranoid fantasies. Although terrorism is not a new phenomenon, it is being
deployed across the world by a growing number of violent but dedicated groups
and individuals ranging from neo-Nazis in Germany to Islamist extremists in
Pakistan and elsewhere.
Recently,
a BBC special report focused on a German group calling itself the National
Socialist Underground that killed seven Turks, plus a Greek and a German police
officer over a 10-year murder spree. Despite the similarity in its methods,
police failed to make a connection between these killings until a botched bank
robbery last November revealed the truth. It appears that the German police had
barely tried to investigate the murders, attributing them to an unknown Turkish
mafia. In the subsequent uproar, federal agents discovered that some documents
had been destroyed, leading to suspicions of a cover-up by right wing
sympathisers.
In
the BBC report, one racist activist said that he could understand—and
sympathise with— the motive behind these killings. He then trotted out the
same drivel about the need for racial purity that so many extreme nationalist
right-wing groups use. The term “Nazi”, of course, is the abbreviation for
National Socialist German Workers Party, the formal name given by Adolf Hitler
to his party.
Leading
to resentment
It
is useful to recall that the rise of the Nazi Party coincided with a period of
acute economic misery in Germany after its defeat in the First World War.
Hyperinflation reached such a level that it took a suitcase full of cash to buy
a loaf of bread. Unemployment was rife, and middle-class Germans found
themselves fighting for survival.
Much
of this economic shambles was caused by the harsh reparations forced on Germany
by the victorious allies. Billions flowed out of the exchequer in Berlin to
London, Paris and Washington. The resultant anger that built up was channelised
by Hitler against the allies abroad, and the Jews at home. Millions of Germans
flocked to Hitler’s banner, and the National Socialists won 37.3
per
cent of the votes in the 1932 elections that propelled Hitler to the position of
Chancellor.
In
the following year, the Nazis had upped their share to 43.9 per cent following a
campaign marred by extreme violence and bullying. Thousands of communists were
locked up, and several left-wing candidates murdered.
The
point here is that a sudden economic collapse and a feeling of resentment
against the “other” can trigger a transformation in political and social
attitudes. This lesson from history is relevant in an era of a crisis of
capitalism. As unemployment in many European countries soars and social benefits
are slashed, right-wing forces expand by focusing public anger against
immigrants.
In
France, the National Front gained its highest number of votes ever, with close
to 20 per cent. Once widely rejected as a gang of racist goons, the party has
now attained a level of support and respectability. If Hollande’s Socialist
Party has to impose unpopular spending cuts, Le Pen and her National Front would
be the major beneficiaries of the ensuing backlash. Needless to say, the party
stands for severe restrictions on immigration.
In
Greece, months of fiscal belt-tightening imposed by the EU and the IMF has
resulted in shocking levels of poverty in a well-off European country. Almost
overnight, millions of Greeks see an uncertain future as jobs and pensions
disappear. Here again, attacks against immigrants have risen sharply, with
the neo-Nazi group Golden Dawn leading the way.
Increasing
Violence
In
a post-religious Europe, ex-tremism takes the path of violence against non-white
foreigners. Because race and colour is the defining identity of many, anger
is directed against those from other ethnic groups. In Muslim countries where
all too often, faith forms the first and most important layer of
identity, those not subscribing to the majority creed are being
increasingly targetted.In Pakistan, for instance, Ahmadis, Christians and
Hindus and also Shia Muslims are being attacked and killed in growing
numbers. In Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Christians have had to flee their
homes. In Egypt, Copts have been discriminated against for decades. And now in
northern Mali, we have the spectacle of people being lashed by extremist
thugs.It seems that rising intolerance, fuelled by a variety of causes, is
leading to increasing violence. In some cases, as in Kashmir and Chechnya,
nationalism feeds freedom movements. In Balochistan, state repression has
sparked off a low-level but deadly separatist struggle. After the collapse and
break-up of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, many of us had
expected a safer and saner world to emerge. Over two decades later, we learned
to our cost that actually, the stand-off between the two superpowers acted as a
force for stability, barring in the areas where they clashed through
proxies.Now, in a world awash in weapons, it seems that violence is the
first—and not the last—recourse to settle any difference of opinion.
All manner of ideologues want to impose their ideologies on the rest
of us. Sadly, it is a warped belief in political Islam that motivates so many of
these extremist groups. But religion is not the only motive for violence. As we
have seen all too often, people like the Norwegian killer Anders Breivik
can slaughter 77 people in cold blood without claiming any divine right to kill.
We
should all be worried about this trend. In the West, security forces are so
preoccupied by the Is-lamist threat that they often overlook the far deadlier
danger posed by homegrown nuts like James Holmes who, with easy access to
arms, gun down so many innocent people.
In
Himalayan arms race, China one-ups India by Frank Jack Daniel
Reuters
- July 30, 2012
Asia's
two great powers are facing off here in the eastern Himalayan mountains. China
has vastly improved roads and is building or extending airports on its side of
the border in Tibet. It has placed nuclear-capable intermediate missiles in the
area and deployed around 300,000 troops across the Tibetan plateau, according to
a 2010 Pentagon report. India is in the midst of a 10-year plan to scale up its
side. In the state of Arunachal Pradesh, new infantry patrols started on the
frontier in May, as part of a surge to add some 60,000 men to the 120,000
already in the region. It has stationed two Sukhoi 30 fighter squadrons and will
deploy the Brahmos cruise missile.
"If
they can increase their military strength there, then we can increase our
military strength in our own land," Defence Minister A.K. Anthony told
parliament recently.
Reuters
journalists on a rare journey through the state discovered, however, that India
is lagging well behind China in building infrastructure in the area. The main
military supply route through sparsely populated Arunachal is largely dirt
track. Along the roadside, work gangs of local women chip boulders into gravel
with hammers to repair the road, many with babies strapped to their backs.
Together with a few creaky bulldozers, this is the extent of the army's effort
to carve a modern highway from the liquid hillside, one that would carry troops
and weaponry to the disputed ceasefire line in any conflict with China. India
and China fought a brief frontier war here in 1962, and Chinese maps still show
all of Arunachal Pradesh within China's borders. The continuing standoff will
test whether these two Asian titans - each with more than a billion people,
blossoming trade ties and ambitions as global powers - can rise peacefully
together. With the United States courting India in its "pivot" to
Asia, the stakes are all the higher.
FIGHT
AN INSURGENCY
"With
the kind of developments that are taking place in the Tibet Autonomous Region,
and infrastructure that is going up, it gives a certain capability to
China," India's army chief, Gen. V.K. Singh, told Reuters the day before he
left office on May 31. "And you say at some point, if the issue does not
get settled, there could be some problem."
Indian
analysts and policymakers went further in their "Non-Alignment 2.0"
report released this year. It argues India cannot "entirely dismiss the
possibility of a major military offensive in Arunachal Pradesh," and
suggests New Delhi should prepare to fight an insurgency war if attacked.
"We
feel very clearly that we need to develop the border infrastructure, engage with
our border communities, do that entire development and leave our options open on
how to respond to any border incursion, in case tensions ratchet up," Rajiv
Kumar, one of the report's authors, said in an interview. Indian media
frequently run warnings of alleged Chinese plots, and both militaries drill near
the border. In March, while China's foreign minister was visiting Delhi, the
Indian air force and army held an exercise dubbed "Destruction" in
Arunachal's mountains. Three weeks later, China said its J-10 fighters dropped
laser-guided bombs on the Tibetan plateau in high-altitude ground-attack
training.
NUCLEAR
WEAPONS
Some
policymakers play down the Arunachal face-off. Nuclear weapons on both sides
would deter all-out war, and the forbidding terrain makes even conventional
warfare difficult. A defense hotline and frequent meetings between top Chinese
and Indian officials, including regular gatherings at the border, help ease the
pressure. Bilateral trade, which soared to $74 billion in 2011 from a few
billion dollars a decade ago, is also knitting ties.From China's perspective,
the border dispute with India doesn't rank with Beijing's other border or
military concerns, such as Taiwan. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Weimin
struck an optimistic tone. "China and India are in consensus on the border
issue, will work together to protect peace and calm in the border region, and
also believe that by jointly working toward the same goal, negotiations on the
border will yield results," Liu said.
Hu
Shisheng, a Sino-India expert at the government-backed China Institutes of
Contemporary International Relations, said the border dispute casts an oversized
shadow in the Indian media - where the China threat is perceived to be strong.
But any voices within the Chinese military that advocate seizing the region are
weak, he said.
"China's
military could take the territory by force, but maintaining the gains in the
long term would be exceptionally difficult," Hu said, noting the tough
terrain.
Yet
with both nations undertaking massive naval modernizations and brushing up
against each other's interests across South Asia and in the South China Sea, the
festering dispute risks being the catalyst for a violent flare-up, some security
analysts say.
STRING
OF PEARLS
For
thousands of years, Chinese and Indian empires were kept apart by the Himalayas.
After years of fast economic growth, the rivals now have the resources to
consolidate and patrol their most distant regions. India is starting to feel
fenced in by Chinese agreements with its neighbors that are not strictly
military but could be leveraged in a conflict. Indians sometimes refer to these
as a "string of pearls," which includes China's force deployments in
Tibet, access to a Myanmar naval base, and Chinese construction of a deepwater
port in Hambantota, Sri Lanka, and another in Gwadar, Pakistan.
Some
in the Chinese government worry that India is becoming part of a U.S. strategy
to contain China. The United States has sold $8 billion in weapons to India,
which is spending about $100 billion over 10 years to modernize its military.
The two nations are unlikely to go to war, but have no choice but to add to
their military strength on the border as they gain clout, a senior Indian
official with direct experience of Sino-Indian relations told Reuters. "It
is the currency of power," he said. In the border negotiations, "we
are ready to compromise, but up to a point."
MUDDY
COIL
The
road to Tawang, a center of Tibetan Buddhism by the border, is one of India's
most strategic military supply routes. Growling convoys of army trucks bring
troops, food and fuel through three Himalayan passes on the 320-kilometer
(199-mile) muddy coil to camps dotted along the disputed border. On a road trip
in late May and early June, Reuters found much of the 14,000-foot-high road to
be a treacherous rutted trail, often blocked by landslides or snow, despite
years of promises to widen and resurface it. At its start in the insurgent-hit
tropical plains of Assam state, the Tawang road is guarded by soldiers armed
with Israeli rifles and shoulder-mounted rocket launchers who sweep for roadside
bombs. Near the end - a tough two-day drive - is the 300-year-old white-walled
Tawang monastery. In the higher reaches, the army convoys struggle along
rock-walled valleys to bases near the McMahon Line, the border agreed to by
India and Tibet in a 1914 treaty and now the de facto frontier with China. It is
the only way in. Supplies are taken to even remoter army posts by 50-mule
caravans on three-day treks. Along the tortuous road, soldiers can be seen
shooting at targets on a firing range. Rows of ammunition sheds behind barbed
wire dot the landscape on a chilly plateau shared with yaks. New fuel depots and
small bases are springing up. In addition to deploying extra troops, missiles
and fighter jets in Arunachal, India plans to buy heavy-lift choppers to carry
light artillery to the mountains.
BUILDING
AIRPORTS
China
rules restive Tibet with an iron hand, and tightly restricts visits by foreign
media, making independent assessments of the military presence in the region
hard. But all signs indicate much more sophisticated infrastructure on the
Chinese side of the border. During the last government-organized visit to Tibet,
in 2010, a Reuters journalist saw half a dozen Su-27 fighters, some of the most
advanced and lethal aircraft China owns, operating from Lhasa's Gonggar airport.
China has been building or extending airports across vast and remote Tibet, all
of which have a dual military-civilian use. Meanwhile, residents on the Indian
side of the border report the Chinese have built smooth, hard-topped roads
stretching to Tibet's capital of Lhasa. Chinese border posts, like India's
today, were once only reachable by horse or mule. Now they are connected by
asphalt. Beyond the frontier, the Chinese improvements include laying asphalt on
a historic highway across the region of Aksai Chin, which is claimed by India.
The construction of the Xinjiang-Tibet national highway 50 years ago shocked
India and contributed to the 1962 war. China's rails are improving, too: Beijing
opened a train line from Tibet to the region in 2006, and an extension is
planned into a prefecture bordering Arunachal. In a 2010 cable released by
Wikileaks, a U.S. diplomat concluded that infrastructure development in Lhoka
prefecture, which according to China includes Tawang, was in part to prepare a
"rear base" should a border clash arise. For years, India deliberately
neglected infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh, partly so it could act as a
natural buffer against any Chinese invasion. That policy was dropped when the
extent of development on China's side became clear.
PRAGMATIC
APPROACH
In
2008, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made his first trip to Arunachal and
promised $4 billion to build a 1,700-kilometer (1,055-mile) highway joining the
valleys of the state as well as a train line connecting to New Delhi. These
would also make troop movements easier. Around the same time, former army chief
Gen. J.J. Singh was appointed governor of the state and is ramping up
infrastructure, power and telecom projects. "Never before in the history of
this region has such a massive development program been conducted here," he
said, sipping tea at his residence.
Singh,
who spent much of his army career in Arunachal, said India and China both
realize "there is enough place and space for both of us to develop. A very
mature and pragmatic approach is being taken by both." But despite 15
rounds of high-level talks, the border issue looks as knotty as ever. Indian
media often whip up anger at Chinese border incursions, played down by both
governments as a natural result of differing perceptions of where the border
lies. India's defense minister told parliament 500 incursions have been reported
in the last two years.
Unable
to match China's transport network, India's focus is now on maintaining more
troops close to the border. "India struggles to build up
infrastructure," said Ashley Tellis of the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, who has written extensively on the India-China
relationship. "They have been trying to do this for the past six or seven
years now, and it is progressing far more slowly than they would like. What they
have done in the interim is build up the troop strength."
COURTING
THE LAMAS
One
of main irritants in India-China relations, and a key part of China's claim to
Arunachal, is Tibetan Buddhism. Beijing claims a centuries-old sovereignty over
Arunachal and the rest of the Himalayan region. India hosts the Dalai Lama and
his Tibetan government-in-exile. When the Dalai Lama fled Chinese rule in Tibet
in 1959, his first stop was the Buddhist monastery in the Arunachal town of
Tawang near the border. Three years later, China occupied the fortress-like
hilltop monastery in the 1962 war before withdrawing to the current lines. In
the 17th century, Tawang district was the birthplace of the sixth Dalai Lama.
Deified as his latest incarnation, the current Dalai Lama visited the monastery
in 2009 and has hinted his next reincarnation will be born in India. Some say in
Tawang.
Tibetan
Buddhists see the Dalai Lama as a living god; China sees him as a separatist
threat. Many in the Indian security community worry that instability in Tibet
after his death could endanger India.
So,
New Delhi is wooing the locals. The intermingling of the Indian army and the
Tawang monks is striking. War memorials on the road are built in the style of
Tibetan Buddhist stupas, with prayer wheels and flags. Soldiers frequently visit
the temple, and advise the lamas about troop movements and developments on the
border. Lobsang Thapke, a senior lama at the monastery, says India's troop
buildup has made the monks feel safe, but that India was far from matching
China's road-building prowess. "From our side, we have to go through a lot
of difficulty," he said in a carpeted room above the main hall, where child
monks chanted morning prayers. "They (India) have not black-topped.
Gravelling has not been done."
ANGER
AND ANXIETY
The
Indian footprint here isn't always welcome. India's new wealth is seen in the
multi-storey hotels mushrooming between traditional wood-and-stone houses in
town, and new Fords and Hyundais on the hilly streets. But anger is rising about
a lack of jobs and perceptions that government corruption is rampant. Student
movements have organized strikes in the state capital. Hotel worker Dorjee Leto
says educated young people like himself feel forgotten by India. There is almost
no mobile phone coverage, power cuts that last days, and just that long muddy
road to the outside world. Anxiety over China, however, outweighs the irritation
with India, says Leto, who like most in Tawang is a follower of Tibetan
Buddhism. "It's a fear, because already China has annexed Tibet. We feel
part of India, we are used to India," he said.
Asianews
Magazine - July 27/Aug 9, 2012
Despite
widespread protests, Laos pushes through with a controversial dam in Mekong’s
waters
To
Sysavan*, the river is his playground. Armed with nets and bamboo baskets, the
boy rushes to the riverbank every afternoon after school. Whatever fish he
catches will feed his family who has lived by the Mekong River for years.But
then his father tells him he would have to let go, as his village must be
cleared, bulldozed and crushed to the ground to make way for the multimillion
dam in Xay-aburi in northern Laos.
“My
father told me we will have to move when the dam construction starts. I don’t
know why but I don’t want to move. I don’t know how to find food there,”
Sysavan tells a team of visitors last May. This June, the entire village was
stripped down, some 300 residents robbed of their homes and relocated to a new
community 35 kilometres away, where there is no farm to till, and no river to
fish from. Despite protests, Sysavan’s village is the first of the 15
communities to be resettled for the construction of the Xayaburi dam, a widely
criticised US$3.5 billion project that will provide electricity to its
neighbour Thailand.
The
proposed 1,285 megawatt dam is first of 11 dams proposed for the Lower Mekong
Mainstream. Environmentalists predict the dam “would irreversibly
alter” the Mekong River’s ecology, affecting water levels and fish migration
in the entire basin. International Rivers reported the project would
directly affect 202,000 living near the dam, and “jeopardise the lives
and food security” of tens of millions more in Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia.
Lao
villagers like Sysavan, mean-while, will be witnessing more resettlement
activities, as construction of the dam continues despite it being
“illegal” and with calls for more studies being made by other Mekong
governments, and recently, even US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton herself,
during her July visit in Laos.
Construction
Goes
On
Visitors who were invited by the Lao government last July 16 to 18 to
inspect the site saw significant progress being made. A team of visitors told
AsiaNews that “it appears the project is in an advanced
preparation stage with substantial site establishment activities and exploratory
excavation in and around the river completed. However, no permanent
structure has been built in the river”. During the visit, The Cambodia Herald
reported that Lao vice min-ister for Energy and Mines Viraphon Viravong made
it “clear that the construction would go ahead”. But just days before the
visit, Lao Foreign Minister Thongloun Sisoulith said the Xayaburi dam had been
postponed, as further environmental studies still need to be undertaken.
However, he also said the government has allowed Thai dam builder Ch. Karnchang
to continue its activities, including the resettlement of affected
villagers.“Laos has been saying for months that it has agreed to suspend
the dam, while at the same time allowing Ch. Karnchang to continue to move
forward. We expect the Lao government to order Ch. Karnchang to
immediately stop all construction-related activities at the Xayaburi site and
cancel plans to resettle more villages until a regional agreement has been
reached,” said Kirk Herbertson, Southeast Asia policy coordinator for
International Rivers. As of yet, member countries of the Mekong River Commission
(MRC)—the inter-governmental river basin organisation—have not decided
whether to proceed with the project or not.
Following
Clinton’s historic visit to Vientiane, Thailand Prime Min-ister Yingluck
Shinawatra assured that Ch. Karnchang “will not begin” any construction
until studies are completed. Whether or not Yingluck can actually make that
happen remains to be seen. The most recent statement from the company’s top
official stated that it is confident Xayaburi will be built on time in 2020
despite hitches.
Better
design?
Both
Ch. Karnchang and Xayaburi dam consultants Swiss firm Poyry and French company
Companie Nationale du Rhone are confident that the dam would not have
“unacceptable negative effects” on the environment and to the people down
south. In their presentation to visitors, they said the dam has been redesigned
to minimise negative environmental impacts. They assured that sediments
would not be rushing down the river and that fish can now travel up and down the
Mekong mainstream via fish ladders and lifts. But International Rivers said such
“heroic statements” bear no weight. It said that while technical
recommendations had been made, additional baseline data are still needed to
fully assess the damage wrought by the dam.
“The
full extent of the dam’s transboundary impacts remains unknown (thus) the
proposed mitigation measures cannot necessarily be deemed effective,”
International Rivers said.
Widespread
Protests
Affected
countries like Cambodia and Vietnam will soon be drafting a letter to the Lao
government asking it to halt work in Xayaburi, The Phnom Post said. In
April, the MRC member countries decided to delay the decision on Xayaburi due to
concerns raised by Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam. Under the countries’ 1995
Mekong Agreement, everyone should be consulted before any project on the Mekong
will be given a go. But Laos’ defiance had the governments up in arms
and activists staging protests. The recent one involves a call to Yingluck to
cancel the dam’s Power Purchase Agreement, or else the Thai People’s Network
of Eight Mekong Provinces will file a lawsuit against the Electricity Generating
Authority of Thailand and Xayaburi Power Co. for illegally signing the
agreement in 2011, said Ame Trandem of International Rivers.
“The
signing took place discreetly,” the group said, without proper public
consultation and assessment of the dam’s impact to the people of Thailand.
Laotians like those from Sysavan’s village clamour for the same thing.
Interviews by the Living River Siam revealed villagers around the dam had not
been properly consulted, with no sufficient information provided, and no written
record of promised compensation. As a result, Sysavan and the other villagers
are now housed in half-finished, leaky wooden structures, with
little or no electricity and water. Also, not everyone has received the cash
compensation promised to them for their loss of home and land, a team of
visitors said. With no jobs to help them get by, each person is supposed
to get 120,000 kip (US$14) a month. “But that’s not enough to buy them food.
Before, they would just go out the sea and fish or take
vegetables from their farms,” Teerapong Pomun, director of Living River Siam,
told AsiaNews. On act of equal defiance, he said at least four households
have now gone back to the old village where they can freely live, in the
meantime at least.
*The
boy’s name has been changed to protect his identity.
Drug
detention centers offer torture, not treatment
HRW - July 24, 2012
UN,
Donors Should Push for Immediate Closure and Community-Based Services
“There
are proven ways to address drug dependency consistent with human rights, but
beatings, forced labor, and humiliation are not among them. These centers need
to be closed, and voluntary, effective drug treatment provided in their
place.”
Hundreds
of thousands of people identified as drug users in China and across Southeast
Asia are held without due process in centers where they may be subjected to
torture, and physical and sexual violence in the name of “treatment,” Human
Rights Watch said in a briefing paper released today. International donors and
United Nations agencies have supported and funded drug detention centers that
systematically deny people rights to effective HIV and drug dependency
treatment, and have ignored forced labor and abuse.
The
23-page document, “Torture in the Name of Treatment: Human Rights Abuses in
Vietnam, China, Cambodia, and Lao PDR,” summarizes research with individuals
who had been detained in Vietnam, China, Cambodia, and Lao PDR. More than
350,000 people identified as drug users are detained in the name of
“treatment” in these countries for periods of up to five years. In many
centers, drug users are held alongside homeless people, people with psychosocial
disabilities, and street children, and are forced to perform military drills,
chant slogans, and work as “therapy.”
“There
are proven ways to address drug dependency consistent with human rights, but
beatings, forced labor, and humiliation are not among them,” said Joe Amon,
director of the Health and Human Rights Division at Human Rights Watch. “These
centers need to be closed, and voluntary, effective drug treatment provided in
their place.” Individuals in drug detention centers in all four countries are
commonly held against their will. They are picked up by police, or
“volunteered” by local authorities or family members who buckle under social
pressure to make their village “drug free.” Once inside, they cannot leave.
No clinical evaluation of drug dependency is performed, resulting in the
detention of occasional drug users as well as others merely suspected of using
drugs.
International
health and drug-control agencies, including the UN Office on Drugs and Crime,
the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), and the World Health Organization,
recommend comprehensive, community-based harm reduction services, including
evidence-based drug-dependence treatment and access to sterile syringes as
essential to protect the health and human rights of people who use drugs. Drug
detention centers that hold drug users for long periods of time without
providing evidence-based treatment violate these standards and are widely
believed to be ineffective. Research in China and Vietnam has found high rates
of relapse among individuals held in drug detention centers, as well as
increased risk of HIV infection from being detained.
Depending
on the country, so-called treatment consists of a regime of military drills,
forced labor, psychological and moral re-education, and shackling, caning, and
beating. Human Rights Watch documented forced labor in detention centers in
China, Vietnam, and Cambodia, though the nature and extent of forced labor
varied within and between countries.
In
Vietnam, “labor therapy” is stipulated as part of drug treatment by law, and
drug detention centers are little more than forced labor camps where tens of
thousands of detainees work six days a week processing cashews, sewing garments,
or manufacturing other items. Refusing to work, or violating center rules,
results in punishment that in some cases is torture. Quynh Luu, a former
detainee who was caught trying to escape from one center, described his
punishment: “First they beat my legs so that I couldn’t run off again...
[Then] they shocked me with an electric baton [and] kept me in the punishment
room for a month.”
Access
to drug dependency treatment within the centers was either restricted to a small
subset of the center’s population, who were also required to adhere to a rigid
and punishing forced labor regimen, or nonexistent. Huong Son, who was detained
for four years in a drug detention center in Vietnam, said, “No treatment for
the disease of addiction was available there. Once a month or so we marched
around for a couple of hours chanting slogans.”
Human
Rights Watch also found evidence that children were detained in drug detention
centers in Cambodia, Vietnam, and Lao PDR, and subjected to the same
“treatments,” including forced labor, military exercises, and physical and
sexual abuse.
“Drug
detention centers jeopardize the health and human rights of detainees,” Amon
said. “They are ineffective, abusive, and are detaining people in violation of
international law.” Mandatory HIV testing was common in China’s drug
treatment centers, but test results were not always disclosed to patients. A
former detainee in Guangxi Province, China, said, “I was tested in detox twice
for HIV but was never told the result. Then when I got out I was so sick that I
went to the clinic. I was scared of getting arrested, but I have a son and I
didn’t want to die. They tested me and told me I have AIDS.” Unprotected sex
and unsafe drug use occur in the treatment centers, but condoms and safe
injecting equipment are not available.
In
March 2012, 12 United Nations agencies, including the UN Office on Drugs and
Crime, the World Health Organization, the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and
UNAIDS, issued a joint statement calling for the closure of drug detention
centers and the release of detained individuals “without delay.” But
international donors continue to provide funding and other support to many
centers, despite the human rights consequences. For example, in June the US
Government pledged $400,000 to support the Lao National Commission for Drug
Control and Supervision to “upgrade” facilities at a detention center which
had been the focus of one Human Rights Watch report. Research in drug detention
centers – such as a recently published study partially funded by the United
States National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) in two Chinese drug detention
centers – often fails to acknowledge the legal context of individuals, and the
conditions they face, inside the centers.
“Donors
should recognize that they cannot credibly call for the immediate release of all
individuals in drug detention centers while continuing to conduct research and
provide support and assistance as if these are legitimate treatment centers,”
Amon said. “Individuals in these centers are being held illegally, abused, and
denied care.”
Selected
accounts from “Torture in the Name of Treatment: Human Rights Abuses in
Vietnam, China, Cambodia, and Lao PDR”
“If
we opposed the staff they beat us with a one-meter, six-sided wooden truncheon.
Detainees had the bones in their arms and legs broken. This was normal life
inside.”
–Former
detainee, Ho Chi Minh City, 2010
“They
try to teach not to use drugs, that it isn’t good to use [drugs], while
showing that normal people have a good future. I don’t think the classes
helped me stop using drugs… Some people use more drugs when they come out of
Somsanga.”
–Former
detainee, Vientiane, late 2010
“There
are lots of people and not enough food. It was hard to sleep there because in my
room there were 60 people. There was not enough water for the showers, only a
few minutes to shower every day.”
–Former
detainee, Vientiane, late 2010
“I
tried to run away, and in the process, I broke both feet. When I went to the
hospital for treatment, I was arrested and sent back to the drug addiction
center… Inside I was given very little food, and they never gave me any
medicine at all to treat my feet. I was locked up for about half a year and my
feet became crippled.”
–Written
account from former detainee, Yunnan, 2009
“All
drug detention is, is work. We get up at five in the morning to make shoes. We
work all day and into the night. That’s all it is.”
–Former
detainee, Yunnan, 2009
“There
were about seven children in my room but maybe about 100 children altogether.
The youngest was about seven years old. The children are not drug users but
homeless, like beggars on the street.”
–Former
detainee, Vientiane, late 2010
Asianews magazine - July 27/Aug 9 2012
Key
players’ interests in territorial claims have led asean to lose its consensus
voice
Which
countries are holding Asean hostage? This has been a frequently asked question
since the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) failed to issue the
joint communiqué during the July meeting in Phnom Penh.
There
are multiple choices, please pick one or more: a) The Asean claimants; b) The
Asean non-claimants; c) The concurrent Asean chair; d) The US; e) China; and f)
all of the above. Here are explanations for each answer.
For
the answer a), there are many reasons. Asean claimants are divided and lack
unity—the grouping’s weakest point. Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and
Brunei seldom hold meetings among themselves to discuss their common strategies.
Back in 1995 they used to back and watch out for each other. As national stakes
are getting higher, they clamour for cooperation. However, when they deem fit,
they would use Asean as a front to counter external pressure. This time around
in Phnom Penh they went on their own different way protecting their turfs.
For
the first time in the Asean’s 45-year history, the joint communiqué was not
released because there were too many details on the disputes in South China
Sea.
Conflicting
Interests
Such
divergent views provided an ideal opportunity for the Asean chair, Cambodian
Foreign Minister Hor Namhong, to go for a kill and cut short the whole debate.
He proposed to the claimants that all of the incidents raised by them should be
referred collectively as “recent developments in the South China Sea”. Take
it or leave it. Bang, bang, nothing came out.
It
was very interesting why he was not in the mood to find a common ground—the
virtue normally displayed by all previous Asean chairs. At the last minute,
Philippine Foreign Minister Roberto del Rosario even softened his wording with
an offer of just mentioning “the affected shoal”.
Now
the Asean leaders must be seriously pondering what would happen when the
region’s longest reigning leader, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, chairs the
November summit.
It
was clear for those who opted for the answer b) that the non-claimant countries
are equally problematic apart from the Asean chair.
There
are two kinds of non-claimants Asean countries—those who are concerned parties
and those who are not. The concerned parties are Singapore, Indonesia and
Thailand, and the rest are not. The trio wants to see progress but they are now
caught in a dilemma as their views and positions could impact on the future of
Asean and the whole gamut of Asean-China relations. Singapore stressed from time
to time that as concerned parties in the disputes both within the Asean and
international context, it must be engaged to ensure freedom and safety of the
sea-lane of communications. So is Indonesia, which also wants Asean to show
solidarity over the dispute. Thailand’s position is a bit tricky. It depends
who is the “real” foreign minister. These core members backed the issuance
of a separate statement on South China Sea at the ministerial meeting. But the
idea was later squashed as the Asean chair said that both China and the
Philippines hold bilateral talks and the tension over the Scarborough Shoal or
Huanyan calmed down. So, there was no need for such a statement. Thailand, which
is a coordinating country for Asean-China relations for 2012-2015, was lobbied
hard by both China and the US for support on their positions. There was even a
suggestion that if there was such a statement on South China Sea, both China and
the Philippines should be mentioned and deplored for heightening the tension
in the South China Sea. Asean Chair Explanation for the choice c) must be that
the Asean chair this year at the Asean annual meeting is a veteran politician,
Foreign minister Hor Namhong. He knows exactly when to pull the trigger. This
time he managed to block the joint communiqué—it will be his legacy. His
action upset several foreign ministers attending the meeting. The reporters
widely quoted Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa’s comments saying
that he was “disappointed” with the outcome and some Asean members acted
“irresponsibly”. Of course, he did not mention Cambodia by name. It remains
to be seen how this will affect the role of Indonesia as observers in the
Thai-Cambodian dispute over the Preah Vihear/Khao Praviharn Temple. There has
been very little progress on this initiative when Indonesia served as chair last
year.In the next two years, Brunei Darussalam and Myanmar will take up the Asean
chair after Cambodia in 2013 and 2014 respectively.
Truth
be told, both countries supported Cambodia on the South China Sea issue.
Although Brunei is one of the Asean claimants, the oil-rich country has
never raised any voice or stated its position outright in this
squabbling. But Brunei and Myan-mar have distinctive positions that the
overlapping claims should be settled among the claimants without using force and
through dialogues. Such views augur well with China’s long standing argument.
Us,
China
For
the answer d), reasons are simple. Everybody knows the US has shown more support
for Asean even though it is cutting its defence budget in the
future. With troops dwindling down in Afghanistan, the US is shifting the
attention to the Asia-Pacific, which could be the next battleground. The
Pentagon plans to increase the troop level from the current 50 per cent to
60 per cent in the next 10 years. Where will the extra 10 per cent of
American troops be making their first home base or rather ro-tational base? With
the US becoming more en-thusiastic in associating with the ongoing Asean
efforts on security matters, some Asean members are feeling gung-ho while others
are feeling uneasy as they know they could become pawns in the big power
games. After all, Southeast Asia will re-main in China’s backyard.
Those
picked e) for an answer must be non-Chinese. Throughout the Asean ministerial
meeting, the Chinese media in China all blamed the Philippines for holding Asean
hostage and wondered aloud why Asean allowed such a behaviour. Interestingly,
only few Chinese commentators mentioned Vietnam though. The South China Sea row
comes at the time when China is promoting new diplomatic approach of
peaceful rise and development. It will be further consolidated as a plan for
regional harmony with the new leadership lineup later this year.
Therefore Beijing does not understand why Asean would allow the Philippines and
Vietnam to turn things upside down in Asean-China relations.Beijing has already
placed relations with developing countries in South-east Asia as the number one
foreign policy priority following the South China Sea tension. China’s ties
with major powers especially the US, Russia and Europe are predictable and
stable. However, now any tension between China and Asean could harm their major
powers’ relations.
All
Players
Finally,
the explanation for the last answer f) is rather self-fulfilling. All of the
above mentioned players have effectively held Asean hostage one way or another.
Many decisions are now stuck because there was no joint communiqué to
officially state their deliberations. All players have used Asean as a toy for
their own benefits, utilising the rhetoric and tactics that Asean leaders are
familiar with.The Asean chair knows full well his pejorative power to shape the
agenda and content. He exercised it with prudence. Likewise, Asean
claimants and non-claimants understand deep in their heart they would never be
able to unite again on a common position on South China Sea as in March
1995.That was why the Philippines has taken all necessary steps to boost its own
position, including increased defence cooperation with the US, much
to the chagrin of other Asean members. The US and China will compete, confront
and cooperate within the Asean frameworks. In the past, no-body was worried
about such engage-ments because Asean spoke with one voice. From now on, all
hell can break loose. Good luck Asean.
Manila
to auction off three areas disputed by Beijing
AsiaNews - Manila - July 31, 2012
The
area of contention is off the western island of Palawan. For the Philippine
government the area, rich in natural gas, is located within its national
territory. Energy Secretary: "our rights are not negotiable." Local
and foreign companies expected to attend auction, including Total, Eni and
Shell.
The
Philippine government launched a tender for the exploration of three areas rich
in oil and natural gas in the South China Sea - which Manila calls West
Philippine Sea - an area in the center of a bitter dispute with Beijing. The
auction should see the participation of various national and international
companies, including the French energy giant Total, Exxon USA, the Italian Eni
and Dutch Royal Shell. It is an attempt by Manila to reduce dependence on
foreign imports and to counter Beijing's expansionist ambitions in the
Asia-Pacific region, which in the past has promoted bids for sea exploration
(see AsiaNews 28/06/2012 South China Sea, tension between Manila, Hanoi and
Beijing. A code of conduct useless), triggering protests from the Philippines
and Vietnam.
The
Philippine Energy Secretary Jose Layug states that all three blocks covered by
the contract belong to the national territory and are located off the western
island of Palawan, where large reserves of underground natural gas were recently
discovered. The official also rejected Beijing's assertions that the area is
within China's maritime boundaries.
"All
the areas we have offered - adds Layug - are well within the 200 nautical mile
exclusive economic zone of the Philippines under the UNCLOS", the United
Nations Convention of the Law of the Seas. The Secretary concludes that
"the Philippines exercises exclusive sovereign rights and authority to
explore and exploit resources within these areas to the exclusion of other
countries. There is no doubt and dispute about such rights."
The
archipelago in the South China Sea, potentially rich in undersea oil fields, is
disputed by China, Vietnam, Brunei, Taiwan, Philippines and Malaysia and there
have been various attempts by all parties to take possession of an atoll or
other produce friction. The Philippines and Vietnam accuse Beijing of being
overly aggressive in claiming sovereignty over the archipelago . In recent weeks
there have been clashes between Filipino, Vietnamese and Chinese vessels. In
particular, the tension between Beijing and Manila peaked last April when a
Chinese patrol vessels blocked - off Scarborough Shoal - Philippine navy boats,
as they were about to stop Chinese vessels that had entered Filippino
territorial waters.
The
hegemonic ambitions of Beijing also worry that the United States which has
increased its naval presence in the Pacific. According to experts at Brussels
based organization the International Crisis Group (ICG), the prospects for
settlement of disputes "are declining" and although a war is
"unlikely", all signals "are going in the wrong direction."
Why a Euro-Zone crisis can’t be avoided very much longer
Time - July 30, 2012
Each
postponement of financial disaster in the euro zone seems likely to last for a
shorter time, and the U.S. won't be able to escape the fallout indefinitely
Stocks
rallied powerfully late last week after European Central Bank President Mario
Draghi declared that the ECB stands ready to do whatever it takes to preserve
the euro. That was mighty tough talk, but analysts remain skeptical about the
outlook for the common European currency. No one doubts that the ECB can provide
short-term support for euro-zone economies. But even so, most forecasters
believe that the euro zone is heading for a crisis. And whatever form that
crisis takes, the impact on the U.S. would be negative. So why did the Dow gain
more than 400 points in two days, rocketing through the 13,000 mark to a
three-month high, after Draghi’s speech on Thursday? The answer is that the
euro’s eventual failure has been predicted for so long that it has become
conventional wisdom. Each postponement creates a burst of optimism — not that
the crisis has been solved but simply that it has been delayed. But each respite
is likely to last for a shorter period of time. And what has finally happened,
in my view, is that the euro has passed the tipping point. From where things
stand now, it seems as though the situation will only get worse — and the
deterioration will probably accelerate.
There
are three seemingly unavoidable problems:
The
next round of losses in Greece cannot be charged mostly to private-sector
lenders. When Greece was bailed out in March, banks and other private investors
took most of the losses, which they were willing to do because they also stood
to lose a lot if Greece defaulted. But now that the share of Greek sovereign
debt held by commercial banks, insurance companies and investment funds has been
greatly reduced, future bailouts will necessarily diminish the value of debt
owned by government banks and international financial institutions. In some
cases, those lenders may be restrained by law from cooperating with any such
devaluation, and at the very least the costs that result will ultimately fall on
taxpayers. Austerity and ECB lending have not been able to hold down interest
rates. Bailouts and budget cuts have been enough to persuade investors to keep
lending to overindebted countries. As a result, bond yields were reduced for a
time in key countries, such as Spain and Italy. Within the past month, however,
yields on 10-year Spanish bonds climbed back up to 7.6%, well above the 7% that
is generally considered to be the danger mark. Yields on Italian bonds also
rose, reaching 6.6%. Since Draghi’s speech, yields in both countries have come
down a bit. But it is notable that recent euro-zone rescue policies have been
unable to hold Spanish and Italian bond yields anywhere close to a safe 5%
level, where they were in March.
The
growing magnitude of the problem will run up against political constraints.
There is a limit to the amount of money the ECB, the International Monetary Fund
and other such lenders have available for bailouts. As those institutions use up
their reserves, they will need large amounts of new money if they hope to keep
postponing a euro crisis. But where will that money come from? The number of
countries in trouble keeps growing. Both France and the Netherlands, which
supported and helped pay for previous bailouts, now have financial problems of
their own. And resistance is growing in Germany against taking on further
liabilities (not to mention the fact that contributing to larger bailouts may
raise constitutional problems).
Of
course, there is no way to know precisely when the scale of euro-zone financial
problems will exceed the resources available to keep postponing them. But it is
clear where the process is heading. And as soon as investors begin to think that
endgame has started, interest rates will probably shoot up in Spain and Italy
and accelerate the process.
Moreover,
in any likely scenario, troubles in the euro zone could have a substantial
negative impact on the U.S. before the November elections. Economies have been
slowing in much of the euro zone — indeed, the private sector has actually
been shrinking for six months. Outside the euro zone itself, the U.K. economy
has been in recession for three quarters. In addition, China’s growth has
dropped from double digits to 7.6%, the lowest level in three years.
Exports
account for less than 14% of the U.S. economy, compared with more than 30% for
the U.K. and almost 50% for Germany. Nonetheless, foreign business is extremely
important for many of America’s largest multinationals and technology
companies. Apple, Coca-Cola, Intel and McDonalds all get more than 60% of their
sales overseas. As a result, any slowdown in foreign economies is a major drag
on important parts of the U.S. economy. That’s one of the reasons that tech
stocks have underperformed the broad market since April. And further weakness
overseas would likely affect even more of the U.S. economy. None of the possible
outcomes for the euro zone augur particularly well. If some of the financially
weak countries are forced to abandon the euro or the euro zone breaks apart,
there will be shocks to the international banking system that would slow most
major economies. And if international bureaucrats are able to sustain the euro
for more than a few months through brilliant management, the austerity policies
needed to do so would only push economies closer to a global recession. Either
way, it’s hard to see how the U.S. can escape the fallout from a European
financial crisis for very much longer.
Slum eviction violates whole circle of rights'
BSS - Dhaka - July 30, 2012
The
eviction of slum dwellers in big cities and towns is nothing but a sheer
violation of the whole circle of human rights, say urban and extreme poverty
experts, insisting the government to think alternative for long term
solutions."Demolishing slums, you are violating fundamental rights of poor
human being, denying their rights to survival and marginalizing poor and the
poorest again," Kishore Kumar Singh, an extreme poverty expert of UNDP,
said on Monday.Kishore, who have been working for urban partnership for poverty
reduction (UPPR) since 2008, said evicting people from slums have never brought
any positive results anywhere in the world, other than bringing miseries to the
'have- nots', while benefiting a rich class.His comments came months after
thousands of slum dwellers were evicted in two major Dhaka slums-Korail and
Shattala-yielding little or no results as poor people did neither gone back to
their villages nor they left the slums."Hardly four or five families have
returned to their villages after the Korail eviction in April, while rest of
2,000 evicted families resettled in the slums" Shahin Islam, a
socio-economic assistant, told BSS at Dhaka City Corporation (North) office. He
said the eviction has rather turned the existing slums more crowded and
increased the house rent as demand goes high. On January 25, the High Court
directed the government to demarcate the city's Gulshan Lake and remove the
illegal structures from it in next two months. A mobile team cleared 170
decimals of land owned by BTCL (80-Decimal), PWED (43-decimal) and the rest by
ICT.Households and shops within twenty meters of the road were bulldozed, with
approximately 2,000 structures and 800 families affected along Gulshan Lake in
Korail slums, while 2,000 households evicted from Shattala in 2010. According to
a research done by the Department for International Development (DFID), at least
60,000 people were displaced due to the evictions from 27 slums between 2006 and
2008 in Dhaka, home an estimated three million people. Shahin said the problems
regarding slums could never be solved so long the demand for poor people remains
active for household works, car driving, low-cost public transportation, and
home security. Te government should rather, he said, earmark areas for
low-income people and share hands with donors to build low cost housing for the
slum dwellers. The idea was, however, denied by an official with the ministry of
works, who said the poor people should be provided adequate employment and other
facilities in rural areas and deter rural-urban migration. He said building low
cost housing would invite rural poor in urban areas. Asked if poor is not in
cities and town, who would serve the rich and middle class, the official said
the people in cities should be self dependent in phases like developed
countries, where individuals have to do their own duties. Kishore said the
government should focus on increasing 'housing stocks' or number of houses for
people in the country as urbanization has been growing in the country at an
average of five percent per annum. Nearly 30 percent people now live in urban
areas in Bangladesh, he said, while half of the country's total population will
be in cities and towns by 2050."City needs the poor, but it never provides
any space for them," he said, referring to Malaysia, a country which has
introduced low cost hosing for the poor people in cities and towns. The problem
of slum dwellers might be eased by this time provided model towns such as
Gulshan, Uttara and Purbachal have strategic areas for poor people's
accommodation.
Building
castles in the air by Syed Mansur Hashim
Daily
Star - July 31, 2012
The
drama of the proposed Padma Bridge building keeps getting more mysterious with
the passage of time. On the one hand, we find the ministry of finance informing
us that the last "objectionable" character has been removed from
office and now there are no more obstacles standing in the way for the stalled
funding to move ahead. Simultaneously, we have mixed signals coming from the top
tiers of government telling us that Bangladesh is not interested in external
funding -- that we will build the bridge using own resources. The ground
realities of building a bridge utilising funds other than that which had been on
offer from multi-donor consortium including the World Bank constitute
multifarious problems and costs.
First
of all, there is the question of finance risk. It is going to be a monumental
task for the government to get hold of an international construction company
with proven track record of completing mega projects such as the Padma Bridge.
As pointed out by Dr. Akbar Ali Khan in a recent seminar, having the World Bank
on the project will provide the financial security any global construction
company will demand prior to getting involved in a project that will span many
years. In the absence of 1st tier construction companies responding to the bid,
we will be left with inexperienced contractors with dubious track record, in
which case neither a timeline for project completion nor the risk of cost
overruns can be ruled out.
On
the question of mobilising local funds, there are a number of impediments. To
what extent can the government draw upon its foreign exchange reserves remains a
major question. This is primarily so because the International Monetary Fund has
set strict conditions on the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) loan amounting to
$987 million. The Quantitative Performance Criteria and Indicative Targets in
the ECF agreement stipulate that the government, under no circumstances can
issue sovereign guarantee and take non-concessional loans exceeding $1 billion
by December, 2012. So, if the government were to move ahead with construction in
2012, it will have to find alternative sources of funding. Any commercial loan
will carry a hefty interest rate and shortened repayment period. According to an
article published in the Financial Express recently, a five-year loan to the
tune of $1.8 billion carrying an 8% interest rate would cost the national
exchequer $455 million per annum, whereas a seven-year loan would cost $349
million per annum. Hence, going with Option A, Bangladesh ends up paying an
estimated $2.23 billion for the five-year option and $2.44 billion for the
seven-year package. In comparison to commercial loans, the now largely-defunct
credit line would have carried a 0.75% service charge and a maturity repayment
period of 40 years. What is of more import is that Bangladesh would have had a
10-year grace period after completion of construction before making any
payments. It would however have been able to collect toll money from Day 1. For
the next decade after grace period, Bangladesh would have been required to pay
interest @2% per annum and for the remaining two decades, a mere 4%. The country
would have paid the Bank an estimated $27 0million over a 40 year period.
From
a financial perspective, moving ahead on the Padma Bridge construction without
the World Bank consortium fails to make sense. Given that, without a transparent
system to oversee allocation of funds, the government will face a monumental
task in getting the international banking system to agree to provide a
syndicated loan. In light of the fact that the World Bank minced no words in
pointing the finger of corruption at Bangladesh and the government's reluctance
to move forward on cases of alleged graft, there is little to indicate
international financiers, even commercial ones will be in a hurry to fund the
project. While it may make perfect sense for the government to go on beating its
nationalistic drum on how the contributions of school children's lunch money
will build the "great bridge," construction of Padma Bridge will
require serious funds and a system of checks-and-balances, neither of which is
at present available to the state. At the end of the day, it is up to the
government to decide on whether it is serious about moving ahead with the single
largest infrastructure project of its tenure -- whether it will be based upon
economic realities, or whether it will subject its citizens to yet another round
of economic hardship through imposition of irrational surcharges in the hope of
getting the stillborn project off the ground.
Chevron
announces $500 million for Bibiyana gas field expansion
Thebangladeshtoday
- Dhaka - July 30, 2012
Chevron Bangladesh on Monday announced a US$500 million expansion plan for its
Bibiyana gas field operation that includes drilling of a number of additional
development wells, expansion of natural gas processing plant and setting up
enhanced gas liquids recovery unit.
Announcing
the mega plan at a function at the city's Ruposhi Bangla Hotel, Chevron
Bangladesh president Geoff Strong said the new investment will boost gas
production by 300 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) by 2014. At present,
Chevron Bangladesh, a subsidiary of US oil major Chevron Corporation, is
producing about 1,122 mmcfd gas from its three gas fields in Sylhet region while
the country's total natural gas production is about 2,239 mmcfd. Chevron's
production is about half of the country's total gas production. The three fields
which Chevron has been operating for a decade are Bibiyana, Moulvibazar and
Jalalabad fields.
Geoff
Strong said US$ 500 million is the largest investment by a single foreign
company ever in Bangladesh. He said the new gas production will provide more
affordable energy to the country that will help reduce poverty.
Finance
Minister AMA Muhith, who was the chief guest at the function, said that
Chevron's investment plan is very important for the country as it will provide
larger supply of gas to meet the essential needs of the country.v He said
providing gas to people involves a number of additional activities like gas
pipeline building and compressor installation.
Muhith
said if the gas exploration continues without any break, it results in getting
additional gas to the existing reserve. "But unfortunately, in Bangladesh,
we've not been continuing gas exploration for which today's gas crisis
persists." He said gas exploration activities will have to be strengthened.
This will lead the country to a new level of development and existence.
The
Finance Minister said though the country is producing 2239 mmcfd gas per day,
still four large fertiliser factories remained closed for gas shortage.
Prime
Minister's Advisor Dr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, State Minister for Power
Mohammad Enamul Haque, US Ambassador in Dhaka Dan W Mozena, Power Secretary Abul
Kalam Azad and Petrobangla chairman Dr. Hussain Monsur also spoke at the
function.
Dr.
Tawfiq Elahi said the government had taken some important decisions three years
back on gas exploration, gas compressor installation and pipeline building which
are now giving results.
Dan
Mozena said the Chevron's investment will help resolve energy crisis in
Bangladesh and also help it become a real Royal Bengal Tiger of the economy.
Abul
Kalam Azad said the power sector is eagerly waiting Chevron's gas for its power
sector. UNB
CHT
land dispute settlement commission law (amendment) to be placed in next JS
session
Thebangladeshtoday
-
Dhaka - July 30, 2012
The Chittagong Hill Tracts Land Dispute Settlement Law (Amendment) bill will
be placed before the parliament in its next session.
The
Bangladesh Bar Council (BBC) is an independent entity and controls the practice
of lawyers in the country and their appointments, bars appointing foreign
lawyers for the war crimes accused being tried at International Crimes Tribunal
(ICT) 1 and ICT 2 that follows the Bar Council law regarding appointment of
foreign lawyers in the ICTs for any accused.
Minister
for Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Barrister Shafique Ahmed told
journalists after presiding over the inter-ministerial meeting on the draft of
CHT Land Dispute Settlement (amendment) Law, held at the Secretariat on Monday.
Replying
to a question that some war crimes accused are negotiating with foreign lawyers
to appoint them for the war criminals to fight their cases at the ICTs, Shafique
said that although the ICTs are international tribunals but the trial of the war
crimes accused are being held in Bangladesh under the law of the country which
is international standard.
"The
Bar Council decides appointing lawyers for any accused facing trial in any court
in the country. So appointment of foreign lawyers by anyone who is undergoing
trial at the ICTs also falls under the purview of the Bar Council", he
stated. About the CHT land dispute law the minister said that a final decision
has been taken about the amendments made to the draft of the CHT Land Dispute
Settlement Commission Act-2001 at the inter-ministerial meeting and it will be
placed for review and ratification before the JS in its next session.
The
meeting, held in the conference room of the CHT Affairs Ministry, was attended
among others by Land Minister Rezaul Karim Heera, Advisor to the Prime Minister
on Foreign Affairs Dr Gowher Rizvi, State Minister for Law Advocate Quamrul
Islam, State Minister for Land Advocate Mostafizur Rahman, State Minister for
CHT Affairs Dipankar Talukder, Chairman of the Taskforce on Refugees in
Khagrachhari Hill District Jatindra Lal Tripura, Secretary of Land Ministry Md
Mokhlesur Rahman and Acting secretary of the Law and Justice Ministry Abu Saleh
Sheikh Md Jahirul Haque. UNB
Minorities
discriminated in Pak, Bangladesh
UNBConnect
- July 31, 2012
The
US on Monday expressed concern over continued religious discrimination against
religious minorities in particular the Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh, citing
instances of violence against them.While Hindus in Pakistan continue to face the
threat of abduction and forced conversion, the members of this minority
religious community and Christians in Bangladesh are experiencing discrimination
and sometimes violence from the Muslim majority population, a report on
international religious freedom released by the State Department said.In
Pakistan less than five per cent of the total population are religious
minorities including Hindus. "Religious minorities claimed that government
actions addressing forced and coerced conversions of religious minorities to
Islam by societal actors were inadequate," the report said."According
to the HRCP (Human Rights Council of Pakistan) and the Pakistan Hindu Council,
as many as 20 to 25 women and girls from the Hindu community were abducted every
month and forced to convert to Islam," it added.The State Department said
on November 9, four Hindu doctors were shot and killed in Chak town of Shikarpur
District, Sindh. According to reports the attack was in reaction to an alleged
relationship between a Hindu man and a Muslim woman. The investigation was
pending at year's end, it said.Minorities in Bangladesh have also been
discriminated against, according to the report. "Hindu, Christian, and
Buddhist minorities experienced discrimination and sometimes violence from the
Muslim majority population," the report said, but quickly noted that abuses
declined in comparison to the previous year in Bangladesh.In Bangladesh, the
report said many Hindus have been unable to recover landholdings lost because of
discrimination under the defunct Vested Property Act. Although an Awami League
government repealed the act in 2001, the succeeding government did not take any
concrete action to reverse the property seizures that occurred under the act.The
Vested Property Act was an East Pakistan-era law that allowed the government to
expropriate "enemy" (in practice, Hindu) lands. "Under the law
the government seized approximately 2.6 million acres of land, affecting almost
all Hindus in the country," the report said.
TIB
slams government nod to illegal housing projects
UNB
Connect - July 31, 2012
Transparency
International Bangladesh (TIB) on Tuesday condemned the government’s reported
decision to legalise some illegal housing schemes defying a High Court directive
and ignoring environmental concerns. Expressing deep concern over the decision
by an inter-ministerial body to ‘provisionally’ approve the projects that
were declared illegal by the High Court in June last year, TIB urged the
government to cancel the decision immediately and refrain from doing the same
for any other similar project.In a statement on Tuesday, TIB executive director
Dr Iftekharuzzaman said, “The decision is as regrettable, illegal and
unacceptable as it is damaging for the reputation of the government. It raises
questions about the government’s commitment to the rule of law, public
interest and environmental justice.”He said the government decision on the one
hand defies the court directive to take action against illegal schemes in
wetlands, water bodies and croplands, and on the other undermines the
credibility of the government in terms of its commitment to environmental
sustainability. “It is common knowledge for all including the Department of
Environment that the projects in question, lying within the jurisdiction of the
Detailed Area Plan (DAP) has been declared illegal particularly for their
adverse environmental implications,” he said. “No words can sufficiently
condemn the apparent collusion of a section of the government with the powerful
lobbies of housing companies at the expense of future sustainability of life and
living.”Dr Iftekharuzzaman said such moves are bound to erode the
environmental credibility of the government and raise doubts about the moral and
ethical basis of its high-sounding commitment to confront environmental
degradation and climate change using national and international funds. “We
urged the government to cancel the approvals without fear or favour to anybody
and refrain from giving approval to any other similar illegal project,” he
said.
Increasing
torture on women, children in Rajshahi
New Age - August 1, 2012
Human
rights activists concerned
Torture
on women and children has increased in Rajshahi city as well as the whole
district in the recent time, sending wave of concern among civil society and
human rights activists.
Some
35 women and 20 children were tortured in the city and nine upazilas of the
district last month, according to human rights organisation Association for
Community Development.
The
ACD gathered the information from reports published in various newspapers of the
country and their own investigation, said a press release of the organisation
Tuesday afternoon.
The
release, signed by Masum Billah, documentation cell officer of ACD, also
described a number of sensational cases of women and child torture.
According
to the press release some 35 women were tortured in the district, among them 13
in the city and 22 in nine upazila.
Among
those five women were tortured at Bagha, same numbers at Durgapur and Charghat,
one at Bagmara, 3 in Godagari, one at Tanore, one at Mohanpur and one at Puthia.
Among
the incidents six women committed suicide, one attempt to suicide, four women
became victim of sexual harassment, 4 were raped and killed, 2 women were
victims of rape attempt and one was abducted.
Among
them, on 3 July, a degree college student was ganged raped at a union council
building under Tanore upazila.
On
July 17, a so-called pir stabbed a housewife at Bagha as victim resisted the
pir’s rape attempt.
On
16 July one Omar Ali tried to rape a seven-year old child at Bagha in the
district and a case has been filled in this connection with Bagha station.
The
press release also said that 20 children were tortured in the city and nine
upazilas of the district last month and among them 7 incidents took place in the
city and others 13 in the nine upazilas.
Talking
to New Age the civil society men and human rights activists expressed their
grave concerned as the incidents of torture on women and children had increased.
Zamat
Khan, general secretary of Rajshahi Rakkha Sangram Parishad, a pressure group,
blamed lax role of law enforcement agencies for increasing the incidents of
torture on women and children.
Bangladesh
Mahila Parishad Rajshahi chapter general secretary Kalpona Ray told New Age that
the law enforcement agencies as well as the news media should come forward to
end repression against women.
Religious
freedom not abused in Bangladesh in 2011: US report
New
Age - August 1, 2012
The
US State Department has said although there were scattered reports of societal
abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice in
Bangladesh but incidents of abuses declined in 2011 in comparison to the
previous year.
‘There
were no reports of abuses of religious freedom. In general, government
institutions and the courts protected religious freedom,’ said the 2011
International Religious Freedom Report released in Washington on July 30.
It
said, in contrast to previous years, there were no instances of missionaries
reporting monitoring of their activities by intelligence agencies.
This
US congressionally mandated report reviewed the status of religious freedom in
199 countries and territories of the world.
Quoting
observers, the report said the government’s treatment of religious minorities
improved during the year, citing the increase in government funds for minority
welfare trusts and police protection of minority groups facing societal attacks.
It
said an amendment to the constitution passed on June 30, 2011 established Islam
as the state religion but reaffirmed the country as a secular state.
The
constitution provides for the right to profess, practice, or propagate all
religions, subject to law, public order, and morality. Citizens were free to
practice the religion of their choice.
The
report said although government officials, including police, were sometimes slow
to assist religious minority victims of harassment and violence, there were
notable examples of timely and effective police intervention.
It
said the government and many civil society leaders stated that violence against
religious minorities normally had political or economic dimensions as well and
could not be attributed solely to religious belief or affiliation.
‘There
were scattered attacks on religious and ethnic minorities perpetrated by
non-governmental actors, and because of the low social status of religious
minorities, they were often seen as having little political recourse.’
The
report said Hindu, Christian, and Buddhist minorities experienced discrimination
and sometimes violence from the Muslim majority population. Harassment of
Ahmadis continued, it added.
Since
2001, it said the government routinely posted law enforcement personnel at
religious festivals and events that were at risk of being targets for
extremists.
Through
additional security deployments and public statements, the government promoted
the peaceful celebration of Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, and secular Bengali
festivals. Durga Puja, Christmas, Easter, Buddha Purnima and Pohela Boisakh
(Bengali New Year) all received these kinds of government support.
It
said the government took a number of steps to promote religious freedom and
secure peace. The government appointed members of minority communities to higher
ranks of government and supported minority religious trusts.
Besides,
parliament passed the Christian Religious Welfare Trust (Amendment) Act 2011,
increasing the amount of fixed deposits from 10 to 40 million taka ($122,000 to
$488,000).
The
government also took administrative action to raise the amount of the Buddhist
Religious Welfare Trust from 30 to 50 million taka ($367,000 to $610,000).
Additionally,
the report said the government made several important religious policy
decisions. First, the Appellate Division Court ruling that fatwas could not be
punitive nor run counter to existing secular laws upholds the country’s
secular nature.
Six-month
maternity leave for the future of Bangladesh
New
Age - August 1, 2012
There
is a solution. Maternity leave is an essential employment benefit that can save
lives, improve health, and embolden our economic future by ensuring that all
mothers in Bangladesh can give their children the best nutrition, writes Prof.
Dr. Md. Ruhul Amin
In
our country, the condition of child nutrition is facing a crisis. Almost half of
the children aged five and younger suffer from poor nutrition. Thirty-six
percent are underweight, and forty one percent are too short for their age. Too
many children have weak immune systems, stunted growth and development, impaired
physical, mental and brain developments, and more infectious diseases—largely
because they are not nourished properly during the first two years of their
life.
All
this lead to a lifetime of reduced productivity. Poorly nourished children are
more likely to drop out of school early and earn significantly less money as
adults. But the impacts of poor nutrition go far beyond individuals and
families. When multiplied across the nation, it takes a devastating toll on the
health and economic development of our entire country. It’s estimated that
undernutrition can cost up to 3 percent of a country’s gross domestic product.
But
poor nutrition is also preventable. In fact, nearly every family in
Bangladesh has all the food they need to feed a child for the first six months
of their life. According to most major international health organizations,
including the World Health Organization and UNICEF, breast milk is the
unparalleled first food for babies during the first six months of life—no
other food or drink is needed, not even water. In fact, research shows that if
all mothers initiated breastfeeding within one hour of birth, it could prevent
one in five newborn death. But balancing between work demands and child feeding
prevents many mothers from being able to breastfeed exclusively. And no
mother should have to choose between saving her job and feeding her child.
There
is a solution. Maternity leave is an essential employment benefit that can save
lives, improve health, and embolden our economic future by ensuring that all
mothers in Bangladesh can give their children the best nutrition. Early last
year, the government of Bangladesh demonstrated leadership and vision by
implementing six months of paid maternity leave for public service
personnel.This expansion of a key government policy is an example of leadership
that will protect the health and well-being of thousands of government employees
and their children. Soon after, in an address at the inaugural ceremony for
World Breastfeeding Week 2011, the prime minister implored private employers to
implement the very same policy.
One
year later, we are observing World Breastfeeding Week again—yet mothers who
work in the private sector still aren’t guaranteed the same benefits as
government workers. In fact, some business leaders now suggest that the
policy for private sector workers should be rolled back from 16 weeks to 12
weeks. But to achieve the policy’s full scale health, and economic impacts,
it’s vital that every employer across Bangladesh adopts thehighest possible
standards to protect our entire workforce. We must protect this important
policy.
Breastfeeding
has widespread benefits for both mothers and their families: it helps children
grow, prevents the high costs of formula feeding, and reduces the risk of a
mother experiencing diabetes, breast cancer, and anemia. Maternity leave further
benefits the employer . Research shows that it can reduce employee turnover and
absenteeism due to child illness, which leads to a more stable and loyal
workforce. And women are more likely to participate in the workforce when
guaranteed employment security and a continued source of income following
delivery, which results in more income tax and government revenues.
It
should come as no surprise that the maternity leave expansion for government
workers was supported by high-level officials within the Ministry of Finance,
the Ministry of Establishment, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, and
the Ministry of Women’s and Children’s Affairs. It had broad support because
poor nutrition affects us all—and its impacts cut across issues of poverty,
health, and ultimately, our nation’s very economy.
The
economic development of Bangladesh rests on a healthy, educated, and productive
workforce—so it’s imperative that our business sector play a key role in
promoting the health of its workers. This World Breastfeeding Week, let’s join
together to ensure that working mothers can provide the best possible nutrition
for their children and for the children of Bangladesh.
Prof.
Dr. Md. Ruhul Amin is a Professor of Paediatrics and Child Heath at the
Bangladesh Institute of Child Health (BICH), Dhaka Shishu Hospital &
President of Bangladesh Paediatric Association (BPA)
Daily Star - July 30, 2012
Prime
Minister Sheikh Hasina has strongly criticised Nobel Laureate Prof Muhammad
Yunus for charging high interest rates by the Grameen Bank he founded.
She
came down heavily on Yunus in an interview with the BBC's HARDtalk. The
interview was taken during her five-day visit to London that ended Sunday.
Here
is the text of a part of her interview.
BBC:
It seems a shame for the Bangladeshi people that your relationship with one of
the most respected business leaders in your country, Noble Laureate Mohammad
Yunus, has also soured so badly. Why did you call him a bloodsucker of the poor?
PM:
You go to Bangladesh, you see in your eyes then you will see. But how could he
say I said it? Did I mention his name? I didn’t. I said someone. But why it
occurred in your mind…
BBC:
Sorry, so let’s be clear about this. So are you now denying that you have said
Mohammad Yunus is a bloodsucker of the poor?
PM:
No I am not denying anything. I am putting a question to you, why it occurred in
your mind that it is him? Why?
BBC:
I have been reading the Bangladeshi press, everybody, it seems, in the
Bangladeshi media believes that you referred directly when you used this phrase
‘a bloodsucker of the poor’. If you want to retract or if you want to tell
me you didn’t mean him, then that’s fine.
PM:
Listen, listen, I am telling one thing. Taking interest 40 percent, 30 percent
or 45 percent from these poor people – is it fair? It is not. How can these
poor people stand by themselves? If you lend money and take 35 to 45 percent
interest, it’s a shame.
BBC:
So the entire model built by Grameen Bank and Mohammad Yunus which has been
celebrated around the world as a way of lifting poor people out of poverty –
you are saying you do not accept it, you do not want it.
PM:
I want there should be an enquiry that how many people come out of poverty
because of that. If there’s one village, how many people? Poverty reduction is
done by my government. Within three years we reduced 10 percent poverty. So, it
is our government. And about this Grameen Bank, it is a government statutory
body.
BBC:
Isn’t it the truth that you forced Mohammad Yunus out of his role in Grameen
Bank after he tried to setup an independent political party in 2007, that’s
why you turned against him?
PM:
Listen, that time I was in custody, I was in jail when he tried to form his
political party. He was such a big person so why he failed? He has every
opportunity, why he couldn’t form his own party?
Have
you ever thought about it? Well, having said that, I am telling you I didn’t
oust him from the Grameen Bank, he himself did it.
Beijing plays up the carrot while still wielding the stick
by Willy Lam
AsiaNews - Hong Kong - July 31, 2012
What
happened in Shifang and Wukan could lead people to think that Communist
authorities have changed the ways they address the growing number of social
protests in China. But they would be wrong. Although the party wants to show
that it is close to the people, it is also trying to keep young people away from
politics and stop the action of dissidents and human rights activists. Beijing
must be careful though. Young people have been the real driving force of every
revolution and young Chinese are increasingly working for change. Here's an
analysis by Willy Lam, an expert in the matter, which AsiaNews is publishing
with permission from the Jamestown Foundation.
The
relatively swift resolution of the protests in Shifang in southwestern Sichuan
Province could mark a turning point in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
administration's handling of the estimated 150,000 or so cases of mass incidents
that erupt every year. While continuing to boost its formidable "preserving
stability" (weiwen) apparatus, Beijing appears to be putting at least as
much emphasis on conciliatory gestures in tackling very public and large-scale
disturbances. No change, however, is expected in the CCP leadership's draconian
measures to stamp out frontal challenges to its one-party rule, including those
posed by dissidents and human rights activists such as Liu Xiaobo, Gao Zhisheng
and Ai Weiwei.
On
July 1, several thousand residents-including scores of high-school students-in
Shifang, a county-level city in Sichuan, held a rally to voice their opposition
to the planned construction of a $1.6 billion molybdenum copper plant. Municipal
officials immediately deployed anti-riot police against the protestors, many of
whom had surrounded party and government buildings. Tear gas was fired at the
demonstrators of whom 27 were arrested (Ming Pao [Hong Kong] July 2). It was
soon apparent that authorities not only in the provincial capital of Chengdu but
also in Beijing decided to adopt a softer and more flexible approach to quickly
defuse this largely environmentally-based protest. Barely two days later,
Shifang cadres buckled under pressure and indicated they had scrapped plans for
the plant, which the officials had claimed earlier would help revive the economy
by bringing in huge employment opportunities. Beijing-based national newspapers
began berating Shifang officials for their failure to make proper consultation
with its people, most of whom were scared of the pollution that the factory
might generate. On July 5, Chengdu dispatched the Zuo Zheng, Vice Mayor of
Deyang City, which has jurisdiction over Shifang, to "supervise" local
Party Secretary Li Chengjin in handling the aftermath of the incident (CNN, July
6; China News Service, July 5).
It
is probably not a coincidence that the same week, the CCP Central
Political-Legal Commission, which is in charge of the nation's police, domestic
intelligence, prosecutors' offices and courts, laid down instructions on
so-called "innovation in preserving stability [methods]" (chuangxin
weiwen). While the leadership has yet to spell out details of chuangxin weiwen,
Politburo Standing Committee member Zhou Yongkang, who heads the Central
Political-Legal Commission, asked law enforcement cadres to emulate the
so-called "Wukan Village Model" (CNTV.cn, July 4). This was a
reference to Guangdong authorities' placatory treatment of "rebel
peasants" in Wukan Village in southern Guangdong. Late last year, residents
there threw out local officials who were accused of illegally confiscating the
household family plots of peasants and then selling them to developers at huge
profits. Fresh elections at Wukan were held in January and a few of the protest
organizers were elected as the village's new administrators ("The Grim
Future of the Wukan Model for Managing Dissent," China Brief, January 6).
After discussions with Guangdong Deputy Party Secretary Zhu Mingguo, who
personally negotiated with the Wukan rebels, Zhou praised Zhu and his colleagues
for their "bold exploration" in political-legal work. "I hope
Guangdong will continue to establish path-breaking experience in chuangxin
weiwen," Zhou said. How to use the "Wukan Model" to handle
confrontation between police and citizens was also featured in a training camp
for 1,400 newly appointed municipal- and county-level police chiefs.
There
are other examples of Beijing's new-found readiness to enforce an
"innovative" style in upholding stability. Feng Jianmei, the woman
from rural Shaanxi Province who was forced to undergo a late-term abortion was
last week promised an unprecedented compensation of $11,000. The grisly picture
of her killed fetus was widely circulated in China's Cyberspace as well as in
the foreign media. Two local officials were sacked and five others penalized for
their overzealous - and illegal - methods in enforcing China's stern one-child
policy .
If
it is indeed true that part of the spirit of chuangxin weiwen includes a more
placatory way to deal with protests, what are the factors behind this turn of
events? Apart from an obvious desire to stop the number and intensity of
anti-government mass incidents from increasing, a key consideration could be the
enhanced activism of the so-called post-80 and, in particular, the post-90
generations-references to Chinese born after 1980 and 1990, respectively. While
the participation of the post-90 generation was already evident in the Wukan
insurrection in Guangdong, this phenomenon first attracted nationwide attention
during the Shifang incident. Particularly noticeable was the unusually
enthusiastic involvement of several dozens of students from Shifang Middle
School. The slogan of these teenagers resonated among the tens of millions of
the country's post-80 and post-90 Netizens: "We are not afraid of making a
sacrifice; we're of the post-90 generation!" .
That
the authorities are nervous about the political awakening of the post-90
generation was evidenced by the speed with which the CCP propaganda machinery
swung into action. The popular Global Times ran an editorial entitled "We
should not encourage high school students to show up at the frontline of
[social] conflicts." The official paper warned different social sectors
"not to unreservedly praise the [political] participation of high school
students." The paper went further, noting "Nobody should encourage
high school students to plunge into different types of mass incidents, not to
mention going to the frontline of political confrontation...It is immoral for
adults to make use of youths to attain their political goals" .
The
party leadership has good reasons to be disturbed by the destabilizing
potentials of politicized youths. During the Cultural Revolution, teenage high
school students as well as college students in their early 20s figured
prominently in some of the bloodiest "armed struggles" among rival Red
Guard factions. The post-90 generation's eagerness about "rights
protection" (weiquan) and defending the rights of the underprivileged has
demonstrated that "patriotic education" about the party's supposedly
glorious achievements is not working well. More significantly, even compared to
their post-80 forebears, members of the post-90 generation seem to have less
economic and political baggage. They do not yet need to worry about jobs and
saving enough money to pay for their first mortgages. Most importantly, the
Internet-especially social media platforms such as the Chinese versions of
Twitter and Facebook-has more influence on their way of thinking than government
propaganda. As famed writer and blogger Han Han wrote of the post-90 youths who
starred in the Shifang demonstrations: "It's wrong to call them future
leaders of the country; they are already today's movers and shakers".
Shifang
also marked one of most obvious instances of the CCP Propaganda Department's
inability to contain public discourse critical of the government in cyberspace,
where more than 500 million Chinese Internet users congregate virtually. More
than 200 nationally known bloggers and Internet-based social critics defied
orders from the authorities by penning pungent commentaries on how cadres'
arrogance and insensitivity had contributed to the Shifang mishap. Han Han and
popular commentator Li Chengpeng also praised the increasing maturity of young
protestors nationwide. Beijing's apparent inability to control Internet-based
opinion leaders also may have prompted central and provincial authorities to
take quick action to mollify Shifang residents .
There
is little evidence, however, that the political-legal apparatus will contemplate
more enlightened methods in dealing with dissidents who are deemed to pose the
most serious threat to CCP authoritarianism. Dissidents, such as human rights
activist Hu Jia and avant garde artist Ai Weiwei, are still placed under 24-hour
surveillance. This is despite the fact that Chinese courts have not convicted
them of any offenses. Even though blind lawyer Chen Guangcheng left China two
months ago, his nephew Chen Kegui is still held by police in Shandong Province.
Attorney Song Ze, one of dozens of human rights lawyers who have helped the Chen
family, has lost contact with his family members or associates. International
human rights watchdogs believe, like famed lawyer Gao Zhisheng, Song has
"disappeared" and is believed to be held in an undisclosed location
somewhere in China .
Beijing's
decision not to yield an inch regarding widespread demands that party
authorities pay hefty compensation to victims of the Tiananmen Square crackdown,
let alone overturn the official verdict on the June 4
"counter-revolutionary turmoil," is also telling. A case in point is
the mysterious death of Hunan Province labor activist Li Wangyang, who was
imprisoned for 22 years because of his role in the 1989 democracy movement. Li
was detained again in late May shortly after he had given an interview to a Hong
Kong television station. On June 6, authorities claimed he had committed
suicide. The 62-year-old's body was incinerated immediately despite queries and
protests lodged by relatives and lawyers about the circumstances of his demise.
Last week, Hunan authorities released a report confirming that Li had taken his
own life. Li's closest kin-his sister and brother-in-law-were kept under house
arrest in an apparent attempt by the police to prevent them from talking to
foreign media .
Chairman
Mao Zedong said it all with this telling remark about the incendiary nature of
popular protest: "A spark from the heavens can set the whole grassland on
fire." While party authorities might have been forced into using relatively
rational and placatory weiwen tactics in the wake of the Wukan and Shifang
incidents, there is slim evidence that the leadership under outgoing President
Hu Jintao is ready to introduce radical measures to promote social justice and
ensure ordinary citizens' rights in political participation. The world-and the
increasingly politicized post-80 and post-90 generation in China-waits with
impatience for signs that the new leadership to be endorsed at the 18th Party
Congress this autumn may bring real reformist zeal to repairing the party's
sorely strained relationship with the citizenry.
Mobile gender courts. delivering justice in the DRC
by Lily Porter
Thinkafricapress
- July 30, 2012
Can
mobile gender courts' swift justice tackle impunity in the DRC's remote regions?
Since
1996, as many as 500,000 people in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) have
been victims of rape and sexual violence, according to UN estimates. To compound
this, these brutal crimes, which have devastated countless lives and communities
in the DRC, are widely conducted with impunity. There is a culture of silence
around rape, victims are often stigmatised by their own communities, and most
attempts to bring perpetrators to justice have so far suffered from
under-funding, lack of reach and questions over integrity. A project using
mobile gender courts in South Kivu is, however, seeking to use innovative ways
to finally put an end to impunity and injustice. These courts travel to remote
regions to deal with crimes of sexual violence and have so far enjoyed relative
success, although the limitations of their approach cannot be ignored.
Impunity
in the Congo
While
victims of sexual violence in the DRC number in the hundreds of thousands, only
a handful of people have been put on trial and even fewer have gone to prison.
In South Kivu in 2005, for example, less than 1% of the 14,200 recorded cases of
sexual violence went to court.
Numerous
measures have been taken to address violence in DRC but these do not always
include sexual violence. In the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) landmark
trial of Thomas Lubanga, for example, the rebel leader was convicted of using
child soldiers but there was disappointment that he was not also charged for
rape and sexual violence, which can be tried under international law as a war
crime. Moreover, the trial was lengthy, costly and carried out in The Hague,
thousands of miles away from the site of his crimes and his victims. The DRC’s
national courts have similarly fallen short in delivering meaningful justice for
victims of sexual violence. Despite a strong legal framework, years of conflict
and corruption have rendered a large portion of the country’s judicial system
lacking in both capacity and integrity. There has been some progress,
particularly in the Ituri district where a court has held prosecutions resulting
in 10 convictions on rape charges, but at the moment the DRC’s judicial system
simply cannot deal with the scale of the crimes. And even with a more robust and
transparent system, there remain practical problems, such as the fact that many
victims cannot easily reach courts or police stations and often cannot afford
the direct and indirect costs of a trial.
Mobile
gender courts
It
was with these numerous weaknesses in mind that mobile gender courts were
conceived. Launched in October 2009 and focused in South Kivu, mobile gender
courts are an enhanced version of existing mobile courts in the DRC which,
unlike most national and international measures of delivering justice, primarily
seek to bring justice to victims of gender violence. Supported by the Open
Society Justice Initiative, American Bar Association Rule of Law Initiative and
Open Society Institute for Southern Africa in collaboration with the Congolese
government, these itinerant civilian and military courts emphasise local-led
justice and the rule of law. The project is active in the larger cities of
Baraka, Bukavu and Uvira, but also uses plane travel and long hours of driving
along muddy potholed roads to reach more remote places like Kamituga, Kalima and
Mwenga. In areas such as these where justice had previously remained elusive,
these courts bring justice to the people. Most court sessions are public and
audiences come from far and wide to see the trials first-hand. Listening to
these cases helps break down the stigma that has encouraged impunity and
educates locals on the rule of law and how victims should be treated, something
the ICC and national courts typically fail to do. The mobile gender courts
nevertheless operate within the national judicial system, and use entirely
Congolese staff, including police, judges, prosecutors and defence counsel, and
court administrators. This is important for promoting the project as one aspect
of improving the country’s judicial system as a whole rather than creating a
parallel externally-led judicial structure.
Delivering
justice
From
their initiation in October 2009 to May 2011, these courts have handed out 195
convictions, 75% of them being for sexual crimes and 25% for crimes such as
murder and theft. Punishments come in form of punitive justice, with up to 20
years in prison. In some cases, financial penalties are awarded. One of the most
prominent cases to date has been the Fizi mass rape trial, which found Colonel
Kibibi Mutware guilty of rape as a crime against humanity and sentenced him to
20 years in prison. He is the first commanding officer to be convicted for such
a crime in eastern DRC, marking an important moment for justice in South Kivu.
Trials typically last two weeks and are, according to Judge Mary McGowan Davis
who was invited by Open Society Justice Initiative and the Open Society
Initiative for Southern Africa to assess the courts, “perhaps better adapted
[than international courts] to the actual task of providing timely redress to
individual victims in communities still struggling with the chaotic aftermath of
war and political upheaval”. The speed of the trials also makes them more
effective than national courts. Under national law, courts have 3 months to
conclude sexual violence cases, and under-resourced national courts are often
too slow to process cases which then get thrown out. Alongside the trials, the
American Bar Association Rule of Law Initiative also works in conjunction with
local civil society groups and the South Kivu Bar Association to provide
sustainable training on the rule of law, educate people about their rights, and
offer medical help and counselling to victims. This offers a more holistic
approach to dealing with the problem of sexual violence and goes beyond mere
justice and begins to address victims’ other needs.
No
silver bullet
Despite
the positive work of these mobile gender courts, they have limitations. The
speedy nature of the trials, while beneficial in one way, can also make
summoning witnesses in time difficult. There is also a lack of resources for
basic equipment like writing paper or computers, the prison system is
inadequate, and the state has failed to pay out for any form of reparations as
of yet. Overcoming these problems, however, requires addressing other areas of
the DRC’s judicial system. Mobile gender courts are no quick fix to the
problems surrounding impunity and injustice in DRC. Just as the scope of the ICC
and the national courts are limited, these courts can only reach out to some of
the many victims. These itinerant courts could, however, be a crucial foundation
upon which the national judicial system and restoration of rule of law can be
strengthened. In conjunction with the ICC and national courts, mobile gender
courts can help tackle impunity at various levels and inculcate a sense of
accountability around sexual violence. By reaching victims in remote areas and
delivering justice quickly, these courts offer perhaps the most optimistic
indication to date that justice for victims of sexual violence in the DRC could
be an achievable reality.
Concern over gold rush
by Rachel Levin
Al
Jazeera - July 31, 2012
It's
a Haitian Gold Rush - that's the rumour we were hearing as we made our way to
Trup du Nord in the northern part of the country.
After
an eight hour car ride on mainly dirt roads, we finally arrived at our
destination. Or at least that's what we thought. Once we got to the small town
we realised that few locals were willing to take us to the rivers where people
panned for gold. It turns out that over the past year dozens of foreigners -
mostly Canadians and Americans had been poking around the same area trying to
convince Haitians to allow them to drill on their land to take samples. For
centuries, Haitians in these parts have panned for gold and it's a secret they
don't want to get out. One local woman told us that she's worried the white
people will steal her gold. "Since I was a kid I have been panning for
gold. I don’t want any company to come here and take our gold away. Gold is my
life!"It took about an hour to convince her to show us the river where she
pans, so worried was she that we would reveal the location to a mining company.
According to an investigative report by Haitian Grassroots Watch - a Haitian
organisation which works with journalism students from the University of Haiti -
foreign mining companies have already invested more than $30 million dollars
collecting samples, building roads and digging.Nearly 15 per cent of Haiti’s
territory is now under license to North American mining firms and their
partners. In the neighbouring Dominican Republic, mining companies believe
they’ve found the largest gold reserve in the Americas: 24 million ounces.
They are hoping the gold rush extends to Haiti – a country where the average
person earns about a dollar a day. Laurent Lamothe, the country's prime
minister, is hopeful that a gold rush could help his country, which is still
struggling to recover from the devastating earthquake in 2010."It gives us
the opportunity to have our financial independence with programmes against
extreme poverty and programmes to create jobs. "Keeping those potential
profits in the country, however, will be a challenge - Haiti has one of the
lowest royalty rates in the western hemisphere — only 2.5 percent of the value
of each ounce of gold extracted. The question of who will benefit from a
potential windfall of profits if large quantities of gold are found is one that
worries Jane Regan, a professor of journalism who is involved with Haiti
Grassroots Watch."There is absolutely no transparency and in the meantime
Canadian and American companies now control more than 1,100 square miles (2,849
sq. km) of Haitian territory and I think that would make anybody nervous.
"Environmental impact from possible future open pit mining projects is also
a major concern. It's still a question whether or not a country which ranks in
the bottom ten of Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index
can provide the necessary oversight to ensure that both profits and the
environment can be preserved. Many Haitians we spoke to are divided on the
issue. Some locals like Jean Igo, who has been unemployed for months, says he
would welcome a job working in a mine. However, after he allowed a Canadian
company to drill on his land he is now having second thoughts about doing
business with foreigners."I don’t trust doing business with them. They
did not give us a good guarantee. They gave us a little cash but it was nothing.
They promised they would give people jobs operating the machines and they did
not fulfill any of their promises."The reality, however, is that big
companies will most likely create thousands of jobs for locals. A fact that
might just convince many that it's worth taking the risk.
The poverty of the tribal Bodo, victims of violence in Assam
by Nirmala
Carvalho
AsiaNews - Mumbai - July 30, 2012
In
Kokrajhar, the epicenter of the riots between Muslim settlers and natives, a
Salesian priest describes the conditions of 15 thousand tribal refugees in the
camps of the diocese. Burned houses, killed livestock and devastated land. The
risk of spreading diseases, especially among the elderly, children and pregnant
women.
A
"pathetic" situation of absolute "poverty and despair": thus
Fr. Sebastian SBD, parish priest of Don Bosco of Kokrajhar, describes the
condition of over 15 thousand tribal accommodated in 10 camps in the parish
following the violence between indigenous Bodo and Muslim settlers to AsiaNews.
Currently, tensions appear to have calmed, and P Chidambaran, the interior
minister, is set to visit the people of Assam. Yet, the Salesian priest said,
these people are facing "an uncertain future, bleak and grim, especially
for their children. They have lost everything."
The
riots erupted in the night between 21 and 22 July, when unidentified gunmen
killed four young people in Kokrajhar district, an area populated by tribal
Bodo. According to preliminary police reports for revenge, some tribes attacked
Muslims, suspected of being responsible for the killing. Since then, violence
has escalated, with different groups who have set fire to cars, homes and
schools, shooting at people and among crowds. Between 22 and 23 July, the riots
spread like wildfire, reaching the district of Chirang. The final toll is about
53 deaths and more than 170 thousand people (tribals and settlers) who have fled
from their villages. These days, Don Bosco Parish has set up 10 refugee camps,
where over 15 thousand tribal Bodo found refuge and support. "The families
- says Fr. Sebastian - have left the villages, bringing with them only the
clothes on their backs, such was their fear. Their homes were reduced to ashes,
their lands were ravaged, their cattle killed. These people are traumatized
physically and psychologically". Now the main danger concerns the spread of
diseases, especially because the country is in the grips of the monsoon season.
"We have emergency tents - said the priest -, in which we distribute
medicines, basic sanitation, clean water and clean sheets. Pregnant women, small
children and elderly are most vulnerable, and we want to limit the
contagion." The northeastern state of Assam is not new to such violence. In
general, the disorders arise from disputes of an economic nature, in which
ethnic diversity is an aggravating circumstance. On several occasions, Bodoland
Territorial Council (BTC), a non-autonomous territorial authority that
administers the Bodo-majority areas, has denounced the abuses committed by
Muslim settlers, who illegally enter India from the border with Bangladesh and
take possession of the land of the indigenous .
Govt
and Maoists target civil society activists
SouthAsia OneWorld – July 30, 2012
In
a report released by Human Rights Watch, Indian authorities and Maoist
insurgents have threatened and attacked civil society activists, undermining
basic freedoms and interfering with aid delivery in embattled areas of central
and eastern India.
The
60-page report, “Between Two Sets of Guns: Attacks on Civil Society Activists
in India’s Maoist Conflict,” documents human rights abuses against activists
in India’s Orissa, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh states. Human Rights Watch
found that grassroots activists who deliver development assistance and publicize
abuses in Maoist conflict areas are at particular risk of being targeted by
government security forces and Maoist insurgents, known as Naxalites. Maoists
frequently accuse activists of being informers and warn them against
implementing government programs. The police demand that they serve as
informers, and those that refuse risk being accused of being Maoist supporters
and subject to arbitrary arrest and torture. The authorities use sedition laws
to curtail free speech and also concoct criminal cases to lock up critics of the
government.
Human
Rights Watch called for an immediate end to harassment, attacks, and other
abuses against activists by both government forces and the Maoists.
“The
Maoists and government forces seem to have little in common except a willingness
to target civil society activists who report on rights abuses against local
communities,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director at Human Rights
Watch and the author of the report. “Aid workers and rights defenders need to
be allowed to do their work safely and not be accused of having a political
agenda simply because they bring attention to abuses.”
The
report is largely based on more than 60 interviews with local residents,
activists, journalists, and lawyers who were witnesses to or familiar with
abuses by Indian security forces and the Maoists primarily in Orissa, Jharkhand,
and Chhattisgarh from July 2011 to April 2012.
While
human rights defenders have rarely come under direct attack from Maoists, they
operate in a climate of fear and are at great risk if they criticize Maoist
abuses. The Maoists have been particularly brutal towards those perceived to be
government informers or “class enemies” and do not hesitate to punish them
by shooting or beheading after a summary “trial” in a self-declared
“people’s court” (jan adalat). Jan adalats do not come close to meeting
international standards of independence, impartiality, competence of judges, the
presumption of innocence, or access to defense.
For
instance, in March 2011, Maoists killed Niyamat Ansari, who helped villagers
access the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme in Jharkhand. The Maoists
abducted him and later admitted to his killing by claiming that he was punished
for “being under the influence of the police administration, carrying out
anti-people, counter-revolutionary activities, and challenging the party.”
Government
authorities in Orissa, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh have arbitrarily arrested,
tortured, and otherwise ill-treated many civil society activists, Human Rights
Watch said. They have frequently brought politically motivated charges against
them, including for murder, conspiracy, and sedition. Sedition charges are
brought despite a 1962 Supreme Court ruling that prosecution under the law
requires evidence of incitement to violence. Often these cases are dropped only
when prosecutors are unable to support the allegations in court. But by then the
activists have already served unnecessarily long periods in detention because
their bail pleas are routinely denied. Police have often attempted to justify
these actions by discrediting activists as Maoists or Maoist supporters.
For
example, Rabindra Kumar Majhi, Madhusudan Badra, and Kanderam Hebram, activists
with the Keonjhar Integrated Rural Development and Training Institute in Orissa,
were arbitrarily arrested in July 2008. All three were severely beaten until
they falsely confessed to being Maoists. Majhi was hung by his legs from the
ceiling and so badly beaten that his thigh bone fractured. However, when James
Anaya, the United Nations special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous people,
expressed concern about their safety, the Indian government, relying on police
claims, insisted that the men had confessed to committing crimes. All three were
later acquitted, exposing the government’s failure to independently
investigate police claims, but each suffered two-and-half years in pretrial
detention.
“Anyone,
including activists, who engage in criminal activities should be fairly
prosecuted,” Ganguly said. “However, local authorities should act on
specific evidence of criminal activity, not a blanket assumption that critics of
the state are supporting Maoist violence. The national government needs to step
in and bring an end to politically motivated prosecutions.”
Activist
Himanshu Kumar had to stop his grassroots work with the predominantly tribal
population in the Bastar region of Chhattisgarh because of state intimidation.
He had built a network of local activists to implement government food and
healthcare programs, and work on other development projects. After the
Chhattisgarh government began to support the Salwa Judum vigilante movement
against the Maoists in 2005, he started filing complaints against Salwa Judum
abuses. He became visible in the media and during protests. In retaliation, the
district administration declared that his organization’s office was located
illegally in protected forest land. In May 2009, police demolished the
structure. Unable to secure any other space in the area, and because of threats
and arrests of several of his workers, Kumar had to leave Chhattisgarh.
“The
Indian government has repeatedly asserted that a parallel approach is needed to
resolve the Maoist problem by delivering development while undertaking security
operations against Maoists,” Ganguly said. “However, the government has
failed to stop local authorities and the security forces from attacking and
intimidating civil society activists who are often implementing the very
programs that could deliver development in these remote and long ignored
areas.”
Accounts:
“The
police say, ‘You travel all over the place. Why don’t the Maoists kill
you?’ But the thing is the Maoists are angry with me, too. The local leaders
say I am inciting people against Maoists. All I am doing is telling people that
they should protest to protect their lives. They are stuck between two sets of
guns, and they should say that they are suffering. I was told by the police,
‘We are watching. You talk too much, and you will be in jail, defending murder
charges.’”
–
Human right activist in Chhattisgarh, August 2011 (details withheld)
“They
[the police] started beating me… They kept asking, ‘Are you a Maoist?’ I
said, ‘No.’ They said if you deny it, we will beat you more. Finally, I
said, ‘Yes.’”
–
Madhusudan Badra, Orissa, July 2011
“My
colleagues were arrested under false charges, even murder…. The number of
violent reprisals kept increasing. I began to feel my strategy had backfired –
instead of protecting them, I had made these tribal people more vulnerable.
Continuing to work in Dantewada would only bring more harassment, more attacks,
more arrests of people I was trying to help. I decided to leave Dantewada.”
–
Himanshu Kumar, Chhattisgarh, August 2011
Low health awareness deadly for children
Irinnews - Jakarta - July 30, 2012
Poor
knowledge of basic healthcare and lack of sanitation are contributing to the
high number of deaths among children under the age of five in Indonesia. Among
poorer households child deaths are more than three times higher than in richer
ones.
According
to Countdown 2015, a global collaboration to achieve health-related Millennium
Development Goals, 151,000 Indonesian children died in 2010 before they reached
the age of five - 35 out of every 1,000 live births. To reach the target of
reducing child deaths by two-thirds of the 1990 death rate, seven more children
out of every 1,000 births need to survive.
Causes
of children under five years dying in 2010 included pneumonia, which accounted
for 14 percent of deaths, preterm births caused 21 percent, injuries 6 percent,
and measles and diarrhoea 5 percent each, according to the World Health
Organization (WHO). The agency noted that 48 percent of children's deaths took
place in their first 28 days of life.
“Poor
nutrition and lack of clean water are important contributors to child mortality
in Indonesia,” said Isni Ahmad, a spokeswoman for the NGO, Plan International,
in Indonesia.
“Efforts
to prevent death from diarrhoea or to reduce the burden of diseases will fail
unless people have access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation,” she
told IRIN.
The
2010 Indonesia Health Profile revealed that 80 percent of the population were
using clean water sources, but only 52 percent used hygienic, or “safe”,
sanitation facilities.
The
Indonesian Health Ministry says only around 12 percent of children aged between
5 and 14 wash their hands with soap after defecating, while 14 percent do so
before eating. Improving the skills of health workers, especially those at
community health clinics, is key to reducing child mortality.
A
study by WHO noted in 2007 that diarrhoea cases could be reduced by 32 percent
if more people practiced basic sanitation, 45 percent washed their hands with
soap, and 39 percent treated household water. The government adopted a child
illness management policy that focuses on disease prevention in addition to
treatment.
Volunteers
trained by local health departments organized monthly check-ups for mothers and
children at more than 260,000 community health posts, but a perceived lack of
support and waning volunteer interest have led to a decline in these services.
Plan
Indonesia is working in 10 of the country’s 33 provinces where infant and
maternal mortality rates are high by providing clean water, helping children
access quality health services, and educating parents about child rearing,
including nutrition.
Improved
health policy and legislation, a renewed focus on reducing malnutrition,
improved coverage of key maternal and child health services, such as antenatal
care and control of common childhood illnesses; are all contributing to
reductions in overall mortality, said the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Nuraini
Razak, a UNICEF information officer in Jakarta, the capital, said the government
is working with UNICEF to expand exclusive breast feeding, community newborn
care, vaccinations, complimentary feeding, and access to clean water and
sanitation.
The U.S. started the war in Iraq. It’s time to finish
it.
Newsweek
- Jul 30, 2012
Want
to know why the world so often distrusts America? Because we’re a nation of
amnesiacs. Our leaders get all hyped up about the need to remake some country
halfway across the world, a country whose political pathologies, we are told,
violate American values and menace American security. The American press joins
in, the American people get dragged along, and next thing you know, American
missiles are raining down on the place.
The
tyrants flee; some other folks take over, and they seem like a big improvement
at first. Then the locals grow unhappy with our presence; they begin killing
U.S. soldiers in attacks that shock Americans and prompt an angry debate about
getting out, which America eventually does. And then it’s done. The curtain
goes down, the show is over, and barely anybody in America pays any attention to
country X anymore. Public conversation, in fact, quickly moves on to countries Y
and Z, where evil rulers or civil strife may or may not pose an intolerable
threat to American values and American security. Of all the tools used to
conduct American foreign policy, perhaps none is as pervasive as the Etch a
Sketch.
So
it was that last week terrorists killed more than 100 people in Iraq—a country
that obsessed us just a few years ago—and barely anyone in America seemed to
notice. The Obama adminstration issued a one-sentence statement. Prominent
Republicans didn’t even do that. Neither Sean Hannity nor Bill O’Reilly
mentioned it on their TV programs. The New Republic, which supported the war
during my time as editor, didn’t mention the attacks either. The Weekly
Standard, to its credit, did, noting that “whatever one thinks of the war in
Iraq, the simple fact of the matter is that without some U.S. combat forces on
the ground America has no ability to fight AQI [al Qaeda in Iraq] and affiliated
groups directly.” All of which may well be true. But the opening
clause—“whatever one thinks of the war in Iraq”—is oddly agnostic for a
magazine that campaigned relentlessly for Saddam Hussein’s overthrow between
1997 and 2003.
So
why should we still care about Iraq? First, because although al Qaeda terrorists
detonated this week’s bombs, it was our invasion that created the chaos that
has allowed them sanctuary; the blood is partly on our hands. Hours after the
bombs hit, President Obama addressed the National Convention of Veterans of
Foreign Wars, where he bragged that “I pledged to end the war in Iraq
honorably, and that’s what we’ve done ... We brought our troops home
responsibly. They left with their heads held high, knowing they gave Iraqis a
chance to forge their own future.” The crowd applauded. Imagine yourself as an
Iraqi, hearing Obama’s banal, self-congratulatory words on CNN while living
the blood-stained future that America’s invasion helped you forge. Or imagine
you heard Mitt Romney’s speech the following day that barely mentioned Iraq
but declared that “throughout history our power has brought justice where
there was tyranny, peace where there was conflict, and hope where there was
affliction and despair ... Our country is the greatest force for good the world
has ever known.” Think how you’d feel about the United States.
The
second reason we should care is that America’s foreign-policy debate
desperately needs some measure of accountability. I’m not suggesting that
politicians and pundits who got Iraq wrong be banished from public life. (This
standard would leave me looking for other work). But neither should they be able
to flee the scene of the disaster. Imagine if every time Joe Biden or Hillary
Clinton or John Bolton or John McCain or William Kristol was interviewed about
military intervention in Iran or Syria, the interviewer began by asking what
they’ve learned about the subject from their experience supporting the war in
Iraq. Simply asking the question would inject a much-needed humility into our
foreign-policy discussion. Asking might also make viewers wonder why they so
rarely hear from experts who did not support one of the greatest disasters in
the history of American foreign policy. Who knows? If Mitt Romney knew that his
foreign-policy surrogates were going to have to own up to their record on Iraq,
he might even think twice before stocking his foreign-policy team with Bush
holdovers.
The
Iraq War didn’t end just because our troops left a little more than six months
ago. Hundreds have died, and the number is likely to rise. The war is ongoing
and it’s horrific, and the least we owe the people whose country we pulverized
is to notice. And if we do notice, perhaps we’ll be slightly better able to
understand why the world doesn’t always see us the way we see ourselves.
Investigate disappearances, killings and torture of Junta opponents
Amnesty
- 31 July 2012
Amnesty
International has documented brutal abuses committed by soldiers loyal to Mali's
military Junta against soldiers and police officers involved in an attempted
counter-coup.©
The
Malian authorities have a duty to investigate all the cases we have documented.
Those responsible for these brutal efforts to avenge the attempted counter-coup
must be held accountable for their actions. Mali must halt its slide into human
rights chaos and open investigations into dozens of cases of enforced
disappearances, extra-judicial killings and torture documented by Amnesty
International. In a report released today following a 10-day mission to Mali in
July 2012, Amnesty International details brutal abuses committed by soldiers
loyal to the military Junta against soldiers and police officers involved in an
attempted counter-coup on 30 April 2012.
In
the days that followed the attempted counter-coup dozens of soldiers were
arrested and taken to Kati military camp, 20 kilometres north of Bamako, the
capital. They were held for more than 40 days in appalling conditions and
subjected to torture and sexual abuse. Twenty one detainees were abducted from
their cell at night and haven't been seen since.
“The
Malian authorities have a duty to investigate all the cases we have documented.
Those responsible for these brutal efforts to avenge the attempted counter-coup
must be held accountable for their actions,” said Gaetan Mootoo, Amnesty
International’s West Africa researcher.
“These
vengeful acts fly in the face of Mali’s international human rights obligations
and action must be taken to ensure the military Junta doesn’t continue to
operate with impunity.”
Amnesty
International’s report details the enforced disappearance of at least 21 named
individuals on the night of 2 to 3 May from the cell they were being held in.
One
of the inmates of these disappeared people prisoners told Amnesty International:
“Around
two in the morning, the door of our cell opened. Our wardens stood at the door
and began to read a list. One by one, the soldiers called, went out. We
haven’t seen our cellmates since that date.”
Amnesty
International is also concerned about a number of soldiers being treated for
wounds in Gabriel Touré Hospital in Bamako who were abducted by the military
junta on 1 May. Despite its requests, Amnesty International has not obtained the
list of these soldiers and has not been able to establish their whereabouts.
While held in Kati military camp prisoners described inhumane and degrading
conditions including 80 inmates wearing just their underwear crammed into a five
metre square cell. The detainees were forced to relieve themselves in a plastic
bag and were deprived of food during the first days of their detention. Some
detainees were regularly taken from their cell to be beaten and interrogated.
One
prisoner described the following torture used to extract a confession from him:
“They
asked us to confess that we had wanted to carry out a coup. They made us lie
face down, they tied our hands behind our backs and then tied them to our feet.
One of them forced a cloth in our mouths using a stick. We couldn’t talk let
alone scream. They put out cigarettes on our bodies, one of them put out his
cigarette in my ear.” In some cases sexual abuse was carried out against
prisoners in Kati. One police officer said:
“We
were four, they asked us to undress completely, we were ordered to sodomize each
other otherwise they would execute us…During the act, our guards shouted us to
do it harder.”
In
2009 Mali ratified the International Convention prohibiting enforced
disappearances and therefore has an obligation under international law to make
known immediately the whereabouts of all those soldiers and policemen who
disappeared in the crackdown following the failed counter-coup. A list of names
is available in Amnesty International’s report. “The transitional government
in Mali is failing in its task to protect the human rights of its citizens and
this lawlessness cannot be allowed to continue,” said Gaetan Mootoo.
“Malian judicial officials must launch an immediate investigation into these
very serious events and restore stability to a country that has suffered
immeasurably over the past six months.”
Funding shortfall affects refugee response
Irinnews - M'bera - July 30, 2012
The
UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) says it is “woefully underfunded” to help Malians
fleeing fighting who have sought refuge across the border in Mauritania’s
M’bera camp, and other neighbouring countries.
UNHCR
has received only 20 percent of the US$153.7 million it asked for to help more
than 380,000 Malians who have fled to the neighbouring countries of Algeria,
Burkina Faso, Mauritania, Niger, Guinea and Togo, spokesperson Sybella Wilkes
told IRIN. More than 90,000 refugees are sheltering in M’bera, which has now
become a contender for Mauritania’s second largest town.
Mauritania
shares its longest border with Mali, where the situation remains very unstable,
with the northern region under the control of a fractious coalition of Islamists
and Tuareg separatists since April. The Economic Community of West African
States (ECOWAS) is reportedly preparing a fresh request for military
intervention in Mali to the UN Security Council.
Wilkes
highlighted the urgent need for funding. “Time is crucial, given the food
crisis in the Sahel region, the rainy season, the menace of cholera and the
instability in Mali,” she said. A cholera outbreak in the region has killed
more than 60 people, and although rains in Mauritania are expected late this
year, aid agencies are concerned. According to UNHCR, the nutrition status of
Malian refugees in Mauritania, Burkina Faso and Niger is “satisfactory”, and
at a “level comparable to the host populations. But for both the host
populations and the refugees, there is a threat of worsening acute malnutrition
over the coming months due to food shortages and the rainy season.
“A
lethal combination of the rainy season and poor sanitary conditions in many of
these camps risks outbreaks of cholera and other diseases,” said a UNHCR
release. “Cases of cholera have been reported in a camp in Niger. Funds are
needed to improve the basic infrastructure of these camps, with a priority being
increased numbers of latrines and improved water provision.”
M’bera
is short of more than 2,000 latrines, which are being constructed on site by
UNHCR with the help of partners Solidarités International and Intermon Oxfam
(Spain), but the camp will still be short of 1,500 latrines at the end of
August.
Adolf
Bushiri Lukale, the Humanitarian Action Programme Manager at Intermon Oxfam,
said they did not have enough money, and getting construction materials across
the sandy terrain in the Sahara was extremely difficult.
Egypt opening doors to Gaza, slowly
Ipsnews - Cairo, July 31 2012
Analysis
by Adam Morrow and Khaled Moussa al-Omrani
With
the election of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi as Egypt’s first-ever
freely elected president, the Gaza file – especially as it pertains to
Egypt’s border with the besieged enclave – is fast becoming one of the new
president’s first major foreign policy challenges.
“Morsi
knows that the Gaza issue is intimately linked to Egypt’s relations with
Israel and the U.S.,” Tarek Fahmi, director of the Israel desk at the
Cairo-based National Centre for Middle East Studies told IPS. “He understands
well that any unilateral change to the status quo on the Egypt-Gaza border would
have serious international repercussions, for which Egypt isn’t currently
prepared.”
Therefore,
Fahmi added, the new president “is likely to tread very, very cautiously on
the issue.”
In
May of last year, three months after Mubarak’s ouster, the closure of
Egypt’s border with Gaza – first imposed by the Mubarak regime in 2007 –
was eased slightly in a nod to post-revolution public pressure. A limited number
of passengers from the strip were allowed to pass through the Rafah
international border crossing, albeit only during certain hours and on certain
days.
The
crossing was, however, kept firmly closed to anything resembling commercial
traffic. The flow of desperately needed commodities from outside – including
foodstuffs, fuel and cement (the latter being necessary to rebuild the strip’s
infrastructure, largely destroyed during Israel’s 2008/2009 war on the
enclave) – continued to rely on subterranean tunnels under the Egypt-Gaza
border.
In
the months following last year’s Tahrir Square uprising, the complete opening
of the Rafah crossing to all forms of traffic had been one of the political
demands voiced by a number of Egyptian revolutionary groups. The country,
however, was soon convulsed by domestic political upheaval, which included
days-long street battles between the army and protesters, along with hard-fought
parliamentary and presidential elections. The festering Gaza issue was relegated
to the backburner.
But
Morsi’s election in hotly contested June presidential polls appears to have
brought the issue back to the fore. In statements made shortly before his
election, Morsi, a long-time member of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, of which
Palestinian resistance group Hamas is a loose affiliate, stated that “the time
has come to open the Rafah crossing to traffic 24 hours a day and all year
round.”
Recent
statements emanating from Hamas, which has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007,
certainly suggest that a major change at the border is imminent. On Jul. 13, two
week’s after Morsi’s inauguration, Hamas political chief Khaled Meshaal
expressed confidence that, along with “protecting the Gaza Strip from any
would-be Israeli aggression,” Egypt’s new president “will open the border
and end the commercial siege of the strip.” On the same day, Ismail Heniya,
head of the Hamas-run Gaza government, also voiced that confidence that Egypt
under Morsi “would never provide cover for any new (Israeli) aggression on the
Gaza Strip,” in a clear reference to the policies of Egypt’s ousted Mubarak
regime. Nor would a Morsi-led Egypt, Heniya added, “continue to take part in
the siege on Gaza.” Statements by officials from the Muslim Brotherhood and
its Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) likewise suggest that the days of the
five-year-old border closure are drawing to a close.
“The
FJP believes that Israel’s oppressive siege of the Gaza Strip must be eased
and that Egypt’s participation (in the siege) must end,” leading FJP member
Saad al-Husseini told IPS. “Egypt must take a firm position vis-à-vis Israel
in this regard.” Al-Husseini added that the FJP – which controls roughly
half the seats in the lower house of Egypt’s (currently dissolved) parliament
– had “no objections to opening the Rafah crossing to both passengers and
commercial traffic, or even establishing a free-trade zone.” But in light of
geo-political realities – namely, Israeli and U.S. opposition to the notion of
relaxing pressure on Hamas – some analysts believe that Morsi will adopt an
extremely gradualist approach to the issue. “Morsi is likely to run into
resistance from Egypt’s deeply-entrenched intelligence apparatus, which views
the Gaza border file as a security, political and intelligence issue, over which
it – not the president – has jurisdiction,” said Fahmi.
Initially
at least, Fahmi added, Morsi “is only likely to take a series of half-measures
aimed at the gradual easing of restrictions on cross-border traffic.” On Jul.
23, new procedures came into effect allowing Palestinians entering Egypt from
Gaza to stay in the country for up to 72 hours. Previously, Palestinians under
the age of 40 entering Egypt had been escorted by Egyptian security personnel
directly from the border to the airport. Egyptian security feared their possible
affiliation with Hamas.On Saturday, Jul. 28, Heniya, having met with Morsi two
days earlier, said that the latter had agreed to “several measures” aimed at
improving conditions in the Gaza Strip. These included increasing the Rafah
crossing’s working hours to 12 per day and raising the daily limit on
passengers from Gaza to 1,500.Fahmi predicts that Morsi will also eventually
open talks with other parties involved aimed at eventually opening the border up
to commercial traffic.“Morsi can’t just unilaterally open the Rafah crossing
to commercial traffic without first discussing it with other relevant parties,
namely, Israel and the (West Bank-based) Palestinian Authority,” he said.“If
the new president makes any serious changes in terms of Egypt’s Gaza policy,
he will likely make them later on down the road,” Fahmi added. “But he will
not make any dramatic moves in the short term while Egypt is facing so many
domestic crises, political and otherwise.”The FJP’s al-Husseini appeared to
confirm this.“Strategic decisions (like those regarding the Gaza border)
aren’t the president’s to make alone,” he said. “Opening the crossing to
commercial traffic, and thus ending the longstanding siege on Gaza, requires
careful study of the political, economic and security-related implications of
such a move.
Berlin
and Washington to sell weapons to Mideast nations to boost Mideast stability
AsiaNews - Berlin - July 30, 2012
The
German government confirms talks are underway to sell tanks to Qatar and Saudi
Arabia. The US plans to strengthen Kuwait defence with missile and radar
systems. Some experts warn this might harm human rights and increase the power
of local dictatorships.
Germany
and the United States continue to sell weapons to their allies in the Middle
East, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. In recent months, the latter have
expressed interest in acquiring more arms, including missiles and tanks worth
billions of dollars.
After
reports indicated that Qatar wanted to buy 200 Leopard-2 tanks worth 2 billion
Euros (US$ 2.5 billion), German government spokesman Georg Streiter today
confirmed a statement of interest by the emirate. Last month, Saudi Arabia
expressed a similar interest in buying up to 800 Leopard-2 tanks worth 10
billion Euros (US$ 12.5 billion).
As
a result, the German government has come under fire with Chancellor Angela
Merkel's foreign policy described as two-faced, pro-peace at UN and NATO
summits, and pro-war and arms sales to countries that do not respect human
rights and religious freedom.
The
United States is not doing much different. Last week, the US Defence Department,
Pentagon announced plans to sell 60 PAC-3 systems, 20 launching stations, four
radar systems and control stations. Last year, it reached a 30-billion-dollar
arms deal with Saudi Arabia.
German
news weekly Der Spiegel said that Chancellor Merket and her government wanted to
sell weapons to key countries in the region to maintain stability and avoid
outside troop deployments in cases of conflict like those in Iraq and Syria.
This
is part of a broader German strategy to hold back the Iranian threat through
strategic alliances with Sunni regimes. However, some wonder what would happen
if weapons fell in the wrong hands.
Markus
Kaim, a security expert at the Berlin-based German Institute for International
and Security Affairs (SWP) has doubts about the strategy.
Selling
weapons to totalitarian regimes like that of Saudi Arabia or factions, like
those in Syria, could actually increase instability.
In
the 1980s, the US outfitted the Taliban in Afghanistan with modern weapons to
resist Soviet invaders, only to find themselves with one of the cruellest
Islamic regimes in the world.
Western
powers, including Germany, sold tanks and other heavy weapons to Indonesia,
which used them against West Papua rebels.
The
latest example is Saudi Arabia, which sent troops and tanks into neighbouring
Bahrain to crush pro-democracy protests.
“Israel’s
heavy-handed abuse of palestinian children is unacceptable” by Thalif Deen
Ipsnews - United Nations - July 30 2012
After
a fact-finding tour of the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip – and following
hearings in Amman and Cairo – a three-member United Nations committee has
lambasted Israel for the harsh treatment of Palestinian children held in
custody.The Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices (facetiously
called the Israeli (mal)practices committee) in the Occupied Territories has
unleashed a scathing attack on the Jewish state for its continued denial of
fundamental human rights of the Palestinians and describing the harshness as
totally “unacceptable”.The chairman of the Special Committee, Ambassador
Palitha Kohona, Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations,
has specifically blasted Israeli security forces for the rigorous crackdown on
children, mostly accused of hurling rocks at a fully-armed
military.“Children’s homes are surrounded by Israeli soldiers late at night,
sound grenades are fired into the houses, doors are broken down, live shots are
often fired, and no warrant is presented,” he said.Worse still, children are
tightly bound, blindfolded and forced into the backs of military vehicles, he
added.In an interview with IPS U.N. Bureau Chief Thalif Deen, Kohona said the
situation in the Occupied Territories has not improved in any significant manner
since his last three official visits to the region.He said witnesses reported
that children in detention are often denied family visits, denied access to
legal representation, held in cells with adults, denied access to education, and
even at the age of 12 tried in Israeli military courts.The Committee was
informed by witnesses that there were 192 children in detention, and 39 were
under the age of 16, said Kohona, a former chief of the U.N. Treaty Section.He
also said Israel’s practice of demolishing Palestinian homes continues, and
Israeli settler violence against Palestinians has increased.The Special
Committee which was created by the General Assembly back in December 1968 also
includes Ambassador Dato Hussein Haniff, Permanent Representative of Malaysia to
the United Nations; and Ambassador Fod Seck, Minister Counsellor of the
Permanent Mission of Senegal to the United Nations in Geneva.
Excerpts
from the interview follow.
Q:
How best would you describe the harsh treatment of Palestinian children by
Israeli authorities?
A:
The Committee took the view that the occupying authorities were not discharging
their international legal obligations towards the people of the Occupied
Territories.
For
example, the principal result of Israel’s blockade of Gaza has been to render
80 percent of Palestinians in Gaza dependent on international humanitarian aid.
The resilience of Gazans for being able to survive on so little, especially in
the face of the inadequate health care, severe constraints on their normal
occupations, frequent power outages, and not infrequent incidents of violence
that mark their daily lives, is admirable. Israel’s blockade of Gaza is
illegal.
Israel’s
security needs can surely be met adequately without resort to some of these
harsh policies. The blockade, in the view of many, amounts to the collective
punishment of 1.6 million Palestinians. It has had a devastating impact on the
lives of people.
Many
witnesses asked whether some of these harsh policies were really necessary to
maintain security or were they actually exacerbating feelings of hopelessness.
Q:
Since these human rights violations are taking place in occupied territories, do
they amount to a violation of the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of
prisoners in conflict situations?
A:
There have been many eminent persons who have taken this view, and the Committee
agrees with this assessment.
Q:
Has Israel ever permitted the Special Committee to visit Israel and record its
side of the story? If not, what is the excuse given by Israel for barring the
Special Committee?
A:
The Special Committee has not been permitted to visit Israel, the occupied West
Bank and Jerusalem or the occupied Golan. Israel has a policy of not cooperating
with the Committee.
Q:
Since you have visited the region three times as chairman of the Special
Committee, what is your assessment of the Occupied Territories?
A:
The situation has not improved in any significant manner. In Gaza, imports
remain at less than 50 percent of pre-blockade levels. Eighty-five percent of
schools in Gaza work on double shifts.
And
Israel’s near total ban on exports from Gaza stifles economic growth and makes
job opportunities scarce. Between 30 and 40 percent of Gazans are unemployed.
Over 1.2 million Gazans received food aid from the U.N. Relief and Works Agency
(UNRWA).
And
90 percent of the water in Gaza is unsafe for drinking. Business has ground to a
standstill with little possibility of importing new equipment or exporting
products.
Unemployment
stands at around 31 percent and the poverty level at 39 percent, according to
the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Q:
What can the United Nations do to improve the situation of Palestinians in the
Occupied Territories? Or do you think the U.N. remains helpless against Israeli
intransigence?
A:
U.N. agencies are playing a major role in keeping the humanitarian situation
from deteriorating further but they have also come under stress due to funding
shortfalls caused by the global financial crisis. They need further funding from
donors.
By
Ceding Northeastern Syria to the Kurds, Assad Puts Turkey in a Bind
Time - July 27, 2012
Ankara
has been a key backer of Syria's rebellion, but the prospect of an Iraq-style
autonomous Kurdish zone has Erdogan threatening to intervene
The
retreat of President Bashar al-Assad’s forces from parts of northeastern Syria
along the Turkish border might have been welcomed by Turkey, a key supporter of
the Syrian rebellion, except for one thing: The region is predominantly Kurdish,
and Ankara fears the resulting power vacuum will be a major boon to its number
one enemy, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) whose three-decade separatist
insurgency has seen some 40,000 people killed.
Until
recently, Syria’s Kurds had been divided. A coalition of roughly a dozen
Kurdish parties had tentatively backed the popular uprising against Assad, while
the PKK’s Syrian ally, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), appeared to align
itself with the Syrian regime, intimidating opposition activists and quashing
popular protests. Others sat on the sidelines, wary of closing ranks with a
Sunni Arab-dominated opposition that turned a deaf ear to Kurdish demands for
new rights in a post-Assad Syria. Two weeks ago – perhaps sensing that the
regime’s fall was imminent – the rival Syrian Kurdish political currents put
aside their differences, under the coaching of Iraqi Kurdish leader Massoud
Barzani. In Irbil, capital of Iraq’s autonomous Kurdish Regional Government,
they signed a unity agreement that has allowed them to take control of several
northeastern towns, Assad’s forces mostly retreating without a fight. The news
sparked a Turkish media and political clamor about the imminent rise of a “PKK
Republic” or a “Western Kurdistan” on Turkey’s southern flank.
Commentators fear that the rise of a second Kurdish statelet, following
the emergence of the one in neighboring Iraq in 2003, would embolden Turkey’s
own 12-15 million Kurds to pursue their own dream of autonomy. Worse still, it
could potentially provide the PKK — branded as a terrorist organization by
Turkey, the U.S., and the EU — with sanctuaries from which to launch
cross-border attacks. Picking up where the media left off, Turkey’s fiery
leader, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, banged the war drums. Though he and
his government proclaim the Kurds a “brother nation,” Erdogan told a TV
interviewer on Wednesday, a Kurdish state in northern Syria would likely become
a “terrorist entity”. If need be, he warned, Turkey would not hesitate to
hit the PKK inside Syria, as it has done repeatedly in northern Iraq. “If a
formation that’s going to be a problem emerges, if there is a terror
operation, an irritant, then intervening would be our most natural right.”
It
would not be easy. In northern Iraq — where the PKK has come under pressure
from a Barzani government that seeks to improve ties with Ankara — the rebels
remain ensconced in remote mountain hideouts, making it easier for Turkish
forces to target them with relative impunity. In Syria, the PKK-aligned PYD is
an urban-based outfit. To bring the fight to them, Turkish troops would have to
operate in large population centers, many of them within a stone’s throw of
the common border. Syrian Kurds are quick to counter Turkish alarmism. Ankara is
overstating the PKK’s influence in Syria, Abdulhalim, a Kurdish activist in
Syria, told TIME via Skype. Even if it is the strongest and best armed of the
Kurdish factions in Syria, the PYD is in no position to overwhelm its local
rivals. “People will not allow the PYD to control the area,” Abdulhalim
insists. “All people here, Arabs, Christians, and other ethnicities, will be
in control.” The radicals would also have to contend with Barzani, whose
government has provided training to Kurdish defectors from Assad’s army.
But,
Abdulhalim warns, nothing would unite the Kurds of Syria more than resistance to
a Turkish incursion. “We are strongly refusing Erdogan talking about any
invasion of Syria to protect Turkey from the PYD,” he says. When the
sabre-rattling dies down, writes Oral Calislar, a commentator for Radikal, a
Turkish newspaper, Ankara will do the same with a Kurdish quasi-state in Syria
as it did with the one in Iraq – learn to live with it. “We used to say
we’d never tolerate an autonomous Kurdistan on our border,” Calislar writes.
“It was one of our ‘red lines.’ And now we’re buddy-buddy with
Barzani.” For the time being, the most that Turkey can do to contain the
fallout from Syria is to make amends with its own Kurds, says Hugh Pope, an
analyst with the International Crisis Group. If Erdogan wants to ensure
Turkey’s security, he adds, his government will have to do so by addressing
the Turkish Kurds’ main grievances – adequate political representation,
mother tongue education, some degree of devolution, and a partial amnesty for
PKK members.
The
situation across the border might be “alarming” for Turkey, says Pope,
“but only because Turkey has not solved its own Kurdish problem.”
Israeli
Group Maps Palestinian Removals by Jillian Kestler-D'Amours
Ipsnews - Occupied West Bank - July 30, 2012
Sitting
in an airconditioned car along Road 60 in the heart of the occupied West Bank,
Ovad Arad explained how he goes about his job: driving unannounced into
Palestinian towns and villages, taking photographs, having coffee with families,
and leaving almost as quickly as he arrived.“I don’t lie. When they ask me
what I’m doing there, I say I’m doing research into the area. I try not to
go into deep conversation. I do the work and go,” Arad told IPS. But he adds
that he doesn’t reveal who he works for, or the real reason he takes photos. A
resident of the Israeli settlement Mero Horon, Arad is head of the Judea and
Samaria (West Bank) division of Regavim, a right-wing Israeli organisation whose
work focuses primarily on using legal channels to have demolition orders on
Palestinian homes and other structures carried out.Asked whether he feels bad
when a Palestinian family has their home destroyed as a result of his work, Arad
responded: “No. Really, no.” And what about Israeli settler homes being
destroyed? “I don’t feel good. It actually hurts me when I see Jews being
thrown out of their house. But I’ve never seen Palestinians thrown out of
their house; I’ve seen Jews being thrown out of their house.”Regavim works
mainly in the Negev desert in southern Israel and Area C of the occupied West
Bank, which covers approximately 60 percent of the territory and, according to
the 1995 Oslo Accords, is under complete Israeli military and administrative
control. Approximately 150,000 Palestinians and 300,000 Israeli settlers
currently live in Area C. Israeli settlements are illegal under the Fourth
Geneva Convention, and settlement outposts are illegal under Israel’s own
laws. Under international law, Israel – as the occupying power in the area –
is also responsible for providing for the needs of the population living under
its control, namely the Palestinians. For Regavim, however, the applicability of
international law to Israel’s control of the West Bank is up for debate.
“The position of Regavim (is that) there is no (Israeli) occupation,” said
Ari Briggs, director of Regavim’s International Department. Regavim relies on
the legal framework of the Oslo Accords in carrying out its work in the West
Bank, Briggs explained. He said that Regavim gets most of its information
through freedom of information requests submitted to the civil administration.
Using geographic information systems (GIS) software and detailed aerial
photography, Briggs said Regavim can map out virtually every inch of Israel –
which, he said, encompasses both Israel proper and Area C.“Hundred percent of
Jewish illegal building will get a demolition order; only a third of illegal
Arab building will get a demolition order,” Briggs, a native of Australia who
has lived in Israel for 18 years, said. He added that the Civil Administration
often retroactively legalises Palestinian construction, something that, he said,
isn’t done for Jewish building.“There are too many lies flying around that
actually there’s discrimination against Arabs, and (that) the government and
the civil administration is fully pro-Jewish. And we’re saying actually it’s
the opposite.”On its website, Regavim describes itself as “a social movement
established to promote a Jewish Zionist agenda for the State of Israel” that
“protect Israel’s lands and national properties.” Despite this mission
statement, Briggs told IPS that Regavim’s work isn’t politically motivated,
but rather guided by “moral and ethical” considerations.“Regavim is not
using the law for political purposes. We’re using the law to try and bring a
rule of law and put a rule of law in place. Our opponents are using the law
courts to make political gains and political points to an ideological point of
view that they have,” he said.
Not
everyone is convinced.
“We
are concerned about Regavim’s involvement because we see them as a very, very
political organisation,” said attorney Tamar Feldman, director of the
Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) department of human rights in the
occupied territories.“They are not concerned about human rights. They’re not
concerned about international law. They’re just out to promote their political
agenda and of course this is very worrying when one is trying to promote human
rights within the territory.”Feldman explained that Regavim petitions have
sped up legal processes and awakened cases dealing with Palestinian building and
planning in Area C, in particular in the South Hebron hills, one of the poorest
and most disadvantaged regions in the area.While Briggs was unable to provide
exact data about the number of demolitions executed as a result of Regavim’s
work, the organisation recently appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court to carry
out 162 interim orders on Palestinian constructions, which have been frozen
since 2008.One of the most prominent cases of Regavim’s influence has been in
Susiya, a Palestinian village in the South Hebron hills, which, after Regavim
appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court to carry out demolition orders, now faces
the prospect of being completely razed to the ground.“They portray the
situation in Area C as if Palestinians don’t have any rights there, they are
just stealing the land, it belongs to Israel and the Jewish people and (the
Palestinians) are outlaws. This has very little to do with reality,” Feldman
said.“The Palestinians in those areas, (like the) South Hebron Hills and
Jordan Valley, have been sitting there for many decades, and for generations
on.”According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA) in the occupied territories, the Israeli Civil
Administration rejected 94 percent of Palestinians’ building permit
applications in Area C between 2000 and 2007.
Lebanon
Heading for Failed State Status? by Mona Alami
Ipsnews - Beirut - July 30, 2012
Every
day Lebanon is being plunged further into a state of general insecurity, as
chaos from the war in Syria seeps across the border.
Repeated
kidnappings, multiple Syrian incursions resulting in the death of Lebanese
citizens, and the widespread use of weapons are just some of the indicators
pointing to the slow meltdown of the country’s public institutions. Following
the release of three officers and eight soldiers linked to the deaths of Sunni
Sheikh Ahmed Abdul Wahed and his companion – who were shot and killed at a
military checkpoint in Kweikhat – gunmen stormed the streets of the northern
Akkar region in protest. The gunmen’s deployment was accompanied by the
erection of multiple roadblocks and heavy gunfire, in an obvious show of
militant force.“The security situation is definitely spinning out of control
due to the government’s disagreement on a unified security approach. Public
institutions and the state are losing their credibility,” a high security
officer, clearly discontent with the current condition of the country, admitted
to IPS. The repeated infiltration of Syrian security forces into Lebanese
territory – whose diverse population is split between supporters of the
opposition Free Syrian Army and communities loyal to the Alawite regime of
President Bashar al-Assad – without any condemnation from the Lebanese
government, has gradually jeopardised the sovereignty of the state.Syrian troops
have also carried out a number of cross-border raids into Lebanon since the
outbreak of the revolt against Assad’s regime in March 2011, sparking fears of
a spillover of the conflict.In the northern region of Wadi Khaled, the most
recent incidents involved Syrian security forces kidnapping a member of Lebanese
customs and two general security members in the Buqaiaa village.Last week, 30
Syrian state troops entered Lebanon’s eastern border region of Masharii al-Qaa
and opened sporadic fire on residents of the area.Masharii al-Qaa (the Qaa
Projects) consists of Ersal, a Sunni village, and Qaa, which is predominately
Christian. Ersal supports Syrian opposition fighters, whom Qaa residents view
with great suspicion. As a result the area has become both a hub for Syrian
refugees and a town under fire from Syrian government forces. This month, three
people were killed and another seven injured when Syrian troops fired shells and
rocket propelled grenades into Wadi Khaled during clashes between gunmen on the
Lebanese side of the border.“We (don’t understand) why the state is so
hesitant to send military troops to the borders.
It
is not normal that a nation refuses to protect its own territory,” Rateb Ali,
a local resident, told IPS.Others sources in the area admit they have lost faith
in Lebanon’s institutions, including the police, army, judiciary and
government.The political vacuum in the north has led local residents to divert
their trust to local political figures and charity organisations. “No one
wants the Syrian crisis to spill over into Lebanon. They want to avoid the
emergence of radical movements, which could easily exploit the state’s absence
in the region,” sociologist Talal Atrissi, referring to the various Salafist
groups that have established themselves in north Lebanon, told IPS.Mistrust in
the government has been exacerbated by other unresolved security incidents,
including the unsolved assassination attempt of MP Boutros Harb, a member of the
‘March14’ anti-Syrian and Iranian coalition.
Local
residents aborted the attempt, wrangling with three suspects that were
installing an explosive device in Harb’s residence before they managed to flee
the scene.“We have clear leads in that particular attempt, which we cannot
share for political reasons. This is exactly why we need to be given the
political means to fight back, which will only happen if there is a clear
consensus among all government figures. If not, the situation will spin out of
control, and it will be too late to fix things,” the security source
warned.Many fear that Lebanon is slowly turning into a failed state, which is
usually defined by several key indicators including: loss of control of its
geographical territory and the use of physical force within it; implosion of the
structures of power and authority; and the internal collapse of law and order.
The current political situation is pushing Lebanon inexorably to face all
three.“Lebanon is a soft state. There was an international decision to build
the country in a way that the state will always have limited power in order for
different communities to prevail,” Dr. Hillal Khashan, political science
professor at the American University of Beirut, told IPS.
Since
its independence in 1943, Lebanon has been a democracy, home to 18 religious
communities.“Lebanon’s system was not designed to work in the first place.
It (experiences) phases of functionality and breakdown, without totally
collapsing – a situation that we are now facing,” Dr. Karim Makdessi,
associate professor at the Issam Fares Institute, a local think tank, told IPS,
adding that public institutions are still operating while admitting that their
credibility has been tarnished.
Both
political scientists agree that when the state weakens and the power of public
institutions diminishes, religious sects strengthen.“Chaos is a way of life in
Lebanon. People are used to it,” stressed professor Khashan. “I still
believe that we are far from being a failed state, like Afghanistan. In spite of
worrying indicators, I do not think the country will reach a state of total
collapse.
”Romney
backs Israeli stance on threat of nuclear Iran
The New York Times - July 29, 2012
Mitt
Romney, on a seven-day overseas trip, met with President Shimon Peres of Israel
at his residence in Jerusalem on Sunday.
“We
have a solemn duty and a moral imperative to deny Iran’s leaders the means to
follow through on their malevolent intentions,” Mr. Romney, the presumptive
Republican presidential nominee, told an audience of about 300, including a
large contingent of American donors who flew here to accompany him. “We must
not delude ourselves into thinking that containment is an option.”
The
speech, delivered at dusk overlooking the Old City, was short on policy
prescriptions, as Mr. Romney tried to adhere to an unwritten code suggesting
that candidates not criticize each other on foreign soil. But there were subtle
differences between what he said — and how he said it — and the positions of
his opponent. While the Obama administration typically talks about stopping Iran
from obtaining a nuclear weapon, Mr. Romney adopted the language of Israel’s
leaders, who say Tehran must be prevented from even having the capability to
develop one.
And
while President Obama and his aides always acknowledge Israel’s right to
defend itself, they put an emphasis on sanctions and diplomacy; Dan Senor, Mr.
Romney’s senior foreign policy aide, went further on Sunday, suggesting that
Mr. Romney was ready to support a unilateral military strike by Israel. “If
Israel has to take action on its own,” Mr. Senor said in a briefing before the
speech, “the governor would respect that decision.”
The
visit to Jerusalem, in the middle of a seven-day overseas tour that began in
London and continues on Monday in Poland, was largely a series of photo
opportunities intended to shore up support among evangelical Christians who have
been wary of Mr. Romney’s candidacy, and to peel off some votes from American
Jews dissatisfied with Mr. Obama’s handling of Israel. It went smoother than
the London stop, in which Mr. Romney appeared to be insulting his hosts by
questioning their preparations and enthusiasm for the Olympic Games, but the
campaign struggled somewhat with the delicate diplomacy of being a candidate
abroad.
After
reports of Mr. Senor’s comments were published, he issued a new statement that
did not mention unilateral action, and later he said he was not necessarily
referring to a military strike. In an interview with CBS News, Mr. Romney stuck
with the softer stance, saying only, “we respect the right of a nation to
defend itself,” and also hinted at the strained choreography of the day.
“Because
I’m on foreign soil,” he said, “I don’t want to be creating new foreign
policy for my country or in any way to distance myself from the foreign policy
of our nation.”
A
few hours later, his 15-minute speech did include one vague shot at Democrats.
“We
cannot stand silent as those who seek to undermine Israel voice their
criticisms,” he said. “And we certainly should not join in that criticism.
Diplomatic distance in public between our nations emboldens Israel’s
adversaries.” He also referred pointedly to Jerusalem as “the capital of
Israel,” something Obama administration officials are loath to do, because
Palestinians also imagine the city as the future capital of their hoped-for
state. The line drew a standing ovation from some in the crowd and, later, an
echo from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who underscored, “Jerusalem will
always be the capital of Israel.” Mr. Netanyahu, whose relationship with Mr.
Obama has been rocky, was generous in his praise of Mr. Romney. “Mitt, I
couldn’t agree with you more, and I think it’s important to do everything in
our power to prevent the ayatollahs from possessing the capability” to develop
a nuclear weapon, the prime minister said earlier in the day. “We have to be
honest and say that all the sanctions and diplomacy so far have not set back the
Iranian program by one iota.”
The
visit, Mr. Romney’s fourth to Israel, coincided with the solemn fast day of
Tisha B’av, which commemorates the destruction of the First and Second Jewish
Temples of Jerusalem. Between meetings with Mr. Netanyahu, President Shimon
Peres and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad of the Palestinian Authority, Mr. Romney
and his wife, along with several of the donors, made a pilgrimage to the Western
Wall, the holiest site in Judaism and a central symbol of the holiday.
Standing
with the chief rabbi of the wall, Mr. Romney, in a black velvety skullcap, was
handed Psalm 121 — “He who watches over Israel will neither slumber nor
sleep” — and later inserted a note into a crack between the stones, as is
traditional (campaign aides declined to reveal its contents).
The
scene was more like a campaign rally than a solemn place of prayer. Women stood
on chairs to peer over the fence that divides them from the men, many of whom
clapped and waved as the candidate and his entourage snaked through; people
actually praying were pushed to the back as security officers cordoned off a
space for the candidate.
“Jerusalem,
the capital of Israel,” one man called out. “Beat Obama, Governor!” said
another.
Shepherding
Mr. Romney at the wall was J. Philip Rosen, a Manhattan lawyer who owns a home
in Jerusalem and helped organize a $50,000-per-couple fund-raiser scheduled for
Monday morning. Mr. Rosen said Sunday he expected up to 80 people for the
breakfast, up from his estimate on Friday of 20 to 30, because of the influx of
Americans.
A
one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other
top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.
Among
those who flew here for the event were the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who
has vowed to spend $100 million this political season to defeat Mr. Obama and
wore a pin that said “Romney” in Hebrew letters; Cheryl Halpern, a New
Jersey Republican and advocate for Israel; Woody Johnson, owner of the New York
Jets; John Miller, chief executive of the National Beef Packing Company; John
Rakolta, a Detroit real estate developer who led the finance committee for Mr.
Romney’s 2008 presidential bid; L. E. Simmons, the owner of a private-equity
firm in Texas with ties to the oil industry; Paul Singer, founder of a $20
billion hedge fund; and Eric Tanenblatt, a Romney fund-raiser in Atlanta who had
never visited Israel. Scott Romney, the governor’s brother, and Spencer Zwick,
his national finance chairman, also were on hand.
They
were greeted at the King David Hotel here on Saturday night with gift baskets
that included white skullcaps, which many wore to the Western Wall, and Israeli
chocolate bars made with Pop Rocks. Some spent Sunday touring Jerusalem, while
others observed the fast; after the speech, Sander Gerber, a hedge fund
financier, and Mr. Rosen were among those who made a makeshift minyan for the
evening service, standing between lines of alternating American and Israeli
flags and overlooking the Old City. As they have for months, Mr. Romney and his
aides played up the relationship between the candidate and Mr. Netanyahu, who
worked together in the 1970s at Boston Consulting Group. During the morning
meeting, according to someone who was there, Mr. Netanyahu at one point showed
Mr. Romney a PowerPoint slide show with detailed information about Iran, and
joked about how it was reminiscent of their consulting days. Later, the two men
and their families shared a post-fast dinner at Mr. Netanyahu’s home, which
Mr. Romney pointed out he had visited before. Danny Ayalon, Israel’s deputy
foreign minister, said in an interview that any closeness between Mr. Netanyahu
and Mr. Romney — or distance between the prime minister and the American
president — was irrelevant.
“Netanyahu
and Romney may be of the same cut ideologically, but this is beside the point
when it comes to leading countries,” said Mr. Ayalon, a former Israeli
ambassador to the United States. “For us it shouldn’t and it does not matter
at all who will be the next president. We should not get involved, and I am
happy to see that we are not involved, even though there are those who are
trying to look microscopically to see if there is any favoritism. It is folklore
more than anything else.”
David
E. Sanger contributed reporting from Dallas.
Sectarian clashes could fuel fresh Rohingya militancy
The
Straits Times - July 31, 2012
Security
situation in Myanmar's Rakhine state very volatile, says observer
As
tension continues in Myanmar's northern Rakhine state, regional security and
intelligence sources are worried that it could sow the seeds of fresh Rohingya
militancy. Sectarian violence between local Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims
claimed at least 78 lives in Rakhine last month. Some 90,000 people have been
displaced by the violence which started after a Buddhist woman was allegedly
raped by Muslim men. From the security perspective, "it is a very volatile
situation", said a foreign diplomat in Yangon who is tracking the Rakhine
state issue closely.
Asking
not to be named, he said on the phone there were worries across the region that
funds and support from overseas Islamic groups to Rohingya groups could
"snowball into something larger".
Myanmar
has an estimated 800,000 Rohingyas. They have lived in the state for generations
but are considered to be foreigners by the government, while many citizens see
them as illegal immigrants from neighbouring Bangladesh and view them with
hostility. Commonly referred to as Bengalis, they do not figure on the country's
official list of more than 130 ethnicities, and have been discriminated against
for decades. Rohingya militancy in the 1980s-1990s was short lived. Unconfirmed
reports last month said two Rohingya refugees detained by Bangladesh security
agencies last month had links with the Bangladesh branch of the banned radical
group Jamiat- ul-Mujahideen. Bangladeshi security agencies had in the past moved
against Rohingya organisations, and Bangladesh intelligence agencies are
concerned that militant Rohingyas using Bangladesh as a safe refuge would sour
relations with Myanmar. After the recent violence, Pakistani Taleban sought to
present itself as a defender of Muslim men and women in Myanmar, saying "we
will take revenge of your blood".
Hizbollah
and Afghan Taleban have also expressed support for the ethnic group.
Government
officials from neighbouring India to Myanmar are likely fearful that radical
Islamic groups may exploit the Rohingya situation for their own ends, according
to a report in International Business Times. The foreign diplomat who spoke to
The Straits Times said: "The situation needs constant attention." The
United Nations views the Rohingyas as one of the most persecuted minority groups
in the world. Myanmar's Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin yesterday rejected
accusations of abuse of the Rohingyas by security forces. At a media conference
in Yangon attended by UN Special Rapporteur Tomas Ojea Quintana, he said the
government had exercised "maximum restraint" in Rakhine. "Myanmar
strongly rejects the accusations... that abuses and excessive use of force were
made by the authorities in dealing with the situation," he said, accusing
some quarters of trying to internationalise the situation as a religious issue.
Quintana,
who is on a week-long visit to Myanmar at the invitation of the government,
plans to visit Rakhine today. Myanmar President Thein Sein had said that only a
third generation descended from those who came into the country before its
independence in 1948 are recognised as citizens.
He
also said the Rohingyas should be repatriated to another country.
But
hundreds of thousands of them would not have requisite paperwork. Opposition
leader Aung San Suu Kyi has also disappointed some rights campaigners by not
offering stronger support to them.
Dying
Muslim Rohingyas everyday in Arakan due
to artificial Famine created by Myanmar security forces
Newsfrombangladesh
- July 30, 2012
On
10th June,2012 Myanmar quasi-civilian government declared emergency in Arakan
which is imposed only on Muslim Rohingyas. Since then Muslims are totally
confined in homes. But without going out how can they buy Rice because Rice is
the only food of the people of Arakan. Few days ago the security forces allowed
Rohingyas to go out for in day time in towns to buy necessary commodities. But
the rice traders are denying to sell rice to Muslims because the security
forces(Police, Nasaka and Lun Tin ) strictly instructed the rice traders to stop
selling rice to Muslims. In fact, rice traders are Buddhist Rakhines because no
restriction of movement has been imposed on them. That`s why Rakhines could
carry rice from other towns of the Arakan, even from Yangon to Akayab,
Buthidaung and Maungdaw. In the rural area of Arakan the Muslims are facing same
problem causing to embrace artificial Famine and now dying Muslims in Arakan
almost every day due to starvation. The Muslims whose homes burnt down during
deadly Riot are now getting rice and other commodities from UNHCR and other NGOs
insufficient. Staff of UNHCR and other NGOs are unable to distribute relief
goods to Rohingya Riot victims independently because the security forces
interfering them and the Rakhines are getting relief materials more than their
daily necessity.
If
such a situation continues Rohingyas in Arakan would be completely exterminated.
Now a lot of Mosques were sealed and about 20 Imams(Religious teachers ) were
arrested and have taken to unknown place and torturing them. All the religious
schools were also sealed.
Rakhine
state is a no-go area for journalists and independent observers, making it
difficult to verify conflicting versions of events. UN inquiry team and
immediate Rice supplying for Muslim Rohingyas is dire necessary in Arakan. Also
Immediate intervention of Muslim world and the international community is most
crucial and imperative in Arakan state because the implementation of Thein
Sein`s Rohingya cleansing policy is applying in humanely. In fact, Muslim
Rohingyas are not demanding separate independent state, rather they are peace
loving people and always maintaining peaceful co-existance with other ethnic
groups in Arakan. Their demand is only to return them their citizenship in order
to enjoying equal rights in their ancestral land, Arakan.
As Kim Jong-un plays in the park, uncle takes the country
by Joseph Yun
Li-sun
AsiaNews - Seoul - July 30, 2012
Hamlet
takes centre stage in Pyongyang. With North Korea's young dictator, Kim Jong-un,
playing happy husband with wife at the amusement part for the greater joy of
photographers, Uncle Jang Song-taek purges the top echelons of the regime to
assert his power. However, he is taking big risks because North Koreans will not
let a non-Kim rule them.
Jang
Song-taek, North Korea's eminence grise, is vying for power. Brother-in-law of
the late Kim Jong-il (he married the latter's sister, Kim Kyong-hui) and uncle
of Kim Jong-un, the current dictator, Jang is responsible for reforms currently
underway in Pyongyang, this according to South Korean and Us intelligence
sources. Last night, North Korea media reported a statement by the regime.
"The puppet group (South Korea)... tried to give (the) impression that the
present leadership of the DPRK (North Korea) broke with the past. This is the
height of ignorance," a spokesman said. "To expect policy change and
reform and opening from the DPRK is nothing but a foolish and silly dream, just
like wanting the sun to rise in the west." Although such rhetoric
corresponds to what we might expect from the world's last Stalinist regime, it
is clear that the power structure in Pyongyang has been changing in the past two
months, not the least the behaviour of the supreme leader.
Unlike
his father (who spoke publicly twice in 17 years) and grandfather (who was a
hardnose ideologue), the new marshal is seen by the population every day,
unafraid of walkabouts.
Since
he came to power, Kim Jong-un has allowed the opening of a pizzeria and a fast
food joint in the capital. He has also inaugurated an amusement park, showed off
his bride and allowed live Olympic broadcasting. What's more, he went along with
his uncle's decision to remove General Ri Yong-ho, Chief of the General Staff of
the Korean People's Army.
The
late Kim Jong-il appointed Jang Song-taek in January 2009 as his son's tutor.
Gradually, from this position, Jang has built up a power base, taking advantage
of his brother-in-law's stroke.
"He
has removed top military commanders from the old guard," a source told
AsiaNews, and "pushed for economic reform." "His nephew is not
stupid, but is not well-versed in the regime's power system. So he needs his
uncle as an ally. The alliance might break but appears to be working for
now."
The
only danger "is that North Koreans see the Kim family as the only one with
the right to rule," the source noted. "Kim Il-sung is still much loved
and his descendants are seen as legitimate and can do as they please. Jang
however must be careful because as soon as his wife dies, he might be
purged."
Trading across the line of control
by Athar Parvaiz
Ipsnews - Srinagar - July 30, 2012
As
part of recent confidence building measures aimed at minimising tensions between
India and Pakistan, which arose largely due to conflicting claims over Kashmir,
the two countries have decided to make the Valley an economic bridge, rather
than a bone of contention.
But
merchants who have long been trading across the Line of Control (LoC), which
separates Indian-controlled territory from Pakistan Administered Kashmir (PAK),
are fearful that efforts to normalise relations between the two countries will
be disastrous for small traders, who will effectively be cut off from the
benefits of bilateral trade. Soon after the inception of a composite dialogue in
2004, initiated after a war crisis in 2001-2002, both states agreed to reopen
the Srinagar-Muzaffarabad road in April 2005 to allow families splintered by the
LoC to visit each other. Still, merchants continue to lament the lack of
adequate trade-related infrastructure, which they say limit what could otherwise
be a highly lucrative flow of goods. The nuclear neighbours have already fought
three full-scale wars over Kashmir while an armed insurgency and
counter-insurgency in Indian Kashmir that erupted in 1989 has claimed 47,000
lives to date, according to official estimates. The insurgency fanned hostility
between the two states, but in recent years, especially in the aftermath of the
September 11th attacks on the United States, the relationship has been changing.
In
October 2008 a series of confidence building measures (CBMs) that included
resumption of cross-LoC trade for the first time in over 60 years began to ease
restrictions in the flow of agricultural and horticultural products like rice,
maize, fresh fruits, vegetables, wooden furniture, medicinal herbs, handicrafts,
mattresses, pillows and cushions out of Kashmir. At the close of 2011 trans-LoC
trade amounted to roughly 37 million dollars. But more than three and a half
years down the line, cross-LoC traders say they are yet to enjoy basic trade
facilities. “When trade between the two sides was first announced,
international media equated it with the falling of Berlin Wall,” Rashid Wani,
a trader who uses the barter system to send consignments of wooden handicrafts
to PAK in exchange for mattresses, cushions and pillows, told IPS. “But
nothing much happened after that media-hype. Doing trade without basic
facilities in the 21st century makes no sense.”
“Our
traders can’t even make a phone call to their counterparts in PAK as the
government of India is yet to lift the ban on telephonic communication from this
side to Pakistan,” Mubeen Shah, president of the Joint Chamber of Commerce and
Industries (JCCI), a committee comprised of members from both sides of the LoC,
told IPS. “Similarly, we can’t make any transactions through banks.”
Cross-LoC
Traders at Risk
Late
last year, Pakistan granted India Most Favoured Nation (MFN) trade status,
evoking mixed reactions from residents in the valley. “This is the first time
since 1965, when India and Pakistan fought the second war, that trade ties seem
to be improving between them,” Khursheed Mahajan, professor of commerce at the
Kashmir University, told IPS. Early this year, the two countries decided to
phase out the negative-list trade regime, which had previously included
thousands of items, and limited the number of restricted products to just 1,200.
The move was a bid to normalise trade relations between the two sides, but it
only caused consternation among Kashmiri traders who fear that competition from
large-scale industries will threaten cross-LoC trade. “We have been observing
that both the countries are working towards improving bilateral trade, which
will have a negative impact on cross-LoC trade,” said Zulfikar Abbassi, former
president of the JCCI. Earlier this month, Abbassi led the traders’ delegation
from Pakistan Administered Kashmir to Srinagar for a two-day conference to
discuss the two sides’ future trade strategy.
“The
principles that are applicable to Indo-Pak trade should be made applicable to
cross-LoC trade also. They have developed bilateral trade to the extent that few
items are in the negative list now. We hope the same policy is applied to our
trade as well,” Abbassi told IPS.
However,
early signs indicate that this may not be the case. “Even among the 16 items
that they have declared (legal) for cross-LoC trade, three to four of them, like
gabba (woolen mats) and khraw (wooden footwear) have absolutely no demand on our
(Pakistan’s) side of the LoC.”
According
to Abbassi, the two-decades long conflict in Kashmir has turned the paradise on
earth into a hell of extreme poverty. According to the 2011 census, 3.2 million
people, 21 percent of the total population of Kashmir, live below the poverty
line, while the unemployment rate is a staggering 11 percent. “So the
governments of India and Pakistan need to encourage trans-LoC trade. This would
enable Kashmiris to overcome the economic deprivation of decades,” Abbassi
said. While no comprehensive research exists, modest estimates say cross-LoC
trade could be in the millions of dollars if allowed without restrictions,
employing thousands of youth.
Abbassi’s
counterparts in Indian Kashmir are equally vehement in their demands.
“The
traders from this part of Jammu and Kashmir are not being allowed to visit PAK.
There has to be actual trade and it would only happen when the traders of both
the parts of the State are allowed to interact and meet each other,” Shah told
IPS. Currently, the entire LoC trade system operates on a barter basis. Since
bartering requires physical marketplaces, the entire operation is held hostage
by restrictions on freedom of movement. Only those 10,000 “broken” families,
with members on either side of the LoC, manage to barter their goods on a
regular basis. If not for the many hurdles, cross-LoC trade would have created
“great economic dividends”, Shah told IPS. “During the 18th century, this
route would handle trade worth millions of dollars in present value.”
According
to Shah, the trading community in 2008 supported opening cross-LoC trade on the
premise that transit trade would eventually be allowed. “We had hoped that our
goods would travel to central Asia, Russia, China, Turkey, Indonesia,
Afghanistan, Iran and the Middle East. This would surely have made trade
flourish. But nothing of the sort happened,” Shah added.
After
the joint conference, traders from both sides of the LoC prepared a list of
recommendations for the meeting of the India-Pakistan working group on cross-LoC
confidence building measures, held in Islamabad on Jul. 19. The final statement
of the Joint Working Group read: “The two sides reviewed the progress since
the last meeting of the Joint Working Group on cross-LoC CBMs and discussed
modalities for strengthening and streamlining the existing trade and travel
arrangements across the LoC.” But Kashmiri traders say that they have heard
these statements several times, though without any positive action. “We still
hope that something positive emerges. Let us wait and see,” Shah told IPS.
A
schoolgirl who chronicled in a diary the horror unleashed by Talibans is seen as
beacon of hope
Asianews
Magazine - July 27/Aug 9, 2012
With
the first su-light removing the darkness of the night, a darker fear would grip
thousands of people living in Swat valley. Men would start their work with their
hearts trembling what new edicts the Talibans might issue. Many had already fled
Swat—once a paradise on earth, a peaceful land of roses and gushing rivers in
northwestern Pakistan—to escape from the horror unleashed by the Talibans who
had taken control of the area in July 2007. For those still living there, the
idyllic spot on the Pak-Afghan border was a valley of destruction and death.
While the world waited anxiously for news from inside the valley, few Swat
people were ready to speak out, fearing retribution by the Talibans. Seeking to
impose their austere interpretation of Sharia law, the militants banned girls’
education in 2008.
By
early January, the world looked at the miseries and pain of Swat through a
beautiful pair of eyes. An 11-year-old schoolgirl from Mingora dared to defy the
fear, as she was uncomfortable with the ban. In her diaries, which first
appeared on BBC urdu service’s website on Jan 9, 2009 under the pseudonym
“Gulmakai”, she described how the ban affected her and her classmates. Her
father, 43-year-old Ziauddin heads the Khushal Khan School and College in Swat
(for boys and girls). He was the spokesman of the national Jirga, a tribal
assembly of elders which takes decision on consensus, in Swat at the time of
Talibanisation when Abdul Hai Kakar, then a correspondent of BBC, reached out to
him and asked him to find a female teacher in Swat who could write about the
cruelties of Taliban. To his disappointment no one agreed to do so. His only
daughter, Yousafzai was just 11 years of age when he first asked her to write
about Swat and the Talibanisation in 2008. She did it. not for the sake of her
father’s wish, but for the sake of the safety and peace of her land. “no one
was willing to write the inside stories, the cruelty, the terror and the
sufferings of the people of Swat because of the life threats by Taliban,”
Ziauddin said during 8th International Conference on Women Leadership in
Islamabad on July 7.
A
beacon of hope for thousands of other girls who dare to dream of education and
ambition, Yousafzai was given the excellence award in the category of “The
Future of Pakistan” during the conference. “I remember the first time I saw
someone print the diary, I could not tell them that it’s my daughter who has
written this. Today, I am happy that the world knows who Gulmakai is,” the
father said. To Yousafzai, writing the diary was not an easy experi-ence. She
was scared. “I remember the first time when I heard the announcement on the
Radio by Shah Dauran, a spokesperson of Taliban. On Dec 29, 2008, he announced
that girls would not go to school from the next day. Then he announced Taliban
achievements which included beheading of those who they found were involved in
“un-Islamic” activities like wearing shirt-pant instead of shalwar-kameez,
and people who stayed at homes or shops during the prayer hours. He clearly said
girls were absolutely not allowed to go to school, because if they get educated,
they will write love letters to boys.
”The
girl first thought she would never be able to go to school again. “At the same
time, I was sure that I am a part of a struggle, and trying to get back to
school was what my struggle asked for. My parents were always very encouraging
to me. At that time, some of our progressive-minded family members and
neighbours gave me strength. This boosted my spirit, and I started writing the
diary.”After the diary was published on BBC website, Shah Dauran threatened
Ziauddin over radio. But he ignored it.“Every person has to die at some point,
whether there is terrorism or not. This does not mean that we should stop
walking on the path of truth. My husband and my daughter both have proven that
no terror can hinder the way of truth. She is making us proud since the day she
was born,” Yousafzai’s mother said during the conference.
The
recognition would work as appreciation and encouragement to complete her long
and tough journey that is ahead, Yousafzai said upon receiving the award.When
she grows up, she wants to be a politician. “The only way to power is
politics, and the only way to politics is education...I want to study law and
dream of a country where education prevails and none sleeps hungry.”Swat is
peaceful now. “But I don’t understand why the government is not showing any
interest in rehabilitating the people who suffered displacement. They are not
even building schools for us. It’s just the Pakistan Army with the cooperation
of UAE government, which is helping recover Swat from the horrific aftermath of
Talibanisation,” she said.Looking back, Yousafzai smiles.
“I
believe that it’s a duty of everyone to raise a voice against violence and
terror. There was a constant race between my courage and my timidity. I was
scared but I always believed that my strength, my faith and my courage will win
this race.
”I
had a terrible dream yesterday with military helicopters and the Taliban. I have
had such dreams since the launch of the military operation in Swat. My mother
made me breakfast and I went off to school. I was afraid going to school because
the Taliban had issued an edict banning all girls from attending schools. Only
11 students attended the class out of 27. The number decreased because of
Taliban’s edict. My three friends have shifted to Peshawar, Lahore and
Rawalpindi with their families after this edict. On my way from school to home I
heard a man saying “I will kill you”. I hastened my pace and after a while I
looked back if the man was still coming behind me. But to my utter relief he was
talking on his mobile and must have been threatening someone else over the
phone. (Jan 3, 2009)
The
night was filled with the noise of artillery fire and I woke up three times. But
since there was no school I got up later at 10:00 a.m. Afterwards, my friend
came over and we discussed our homework. Today is January 15, the last day
before the Taliban’s edict comes into effect, and my friend was discussing
homework as if nothing out of the ordinary had happened. (Jan 15, 2009)
I
woke to the roar of heavy artillery fire early in the morning. Earlier we were
afraid of the noise of helicopters and now the artillery. I remember the first
time when helicopters flew over our house on the start of an operation. We got
so scared that we hid. All the children in my neighbourhood were also very
scared. One day toffees were thrown from the helicopters and this continued for
some time. Now whenever we hear the choppers flying we run out and wait for the
toffees but it does not happen anymore. (Jan 26, 2009)
Rough
ride for bomb blast victims and their families
Irinnews - Islamabad - July 30, 2012
With
bombs causing nearly 600 deaths and over 1,400 injuries in Pakistan in the first
half of 2012 alone, a new scheme to help those directly affected by such
explosions is being put to the test.In November 2011 the government decided to
provide an assistance package for victims of “terrorist” attacks under the
Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP), which was set up in 2008 with initial
government funding of US425 million and is designed to help the needy. Muhammad
Ahsan, a media assistant at BISP, told IRIN: “We are currently assisting some
1,500 blast victims with a stipend of Rs 1,000 [US$11] per month. He said the
amount was the same as that offered to other families across the country - and
was given out as cash. Ahsan explained that the verification process to
determine who is a victim is carried out by the National Database and
Registration Authority. “There are some problems involved in this, as many
terrorism victims come from tribal areas, and may lack documentation. This is
especially true for women. In this case we seek help from local union
councillors or other officials to ensure the claim is correct,” he said,
adding: “The stipend helps support family income and offers some
help.”Thousands of victims need help, with violence “peaking in the country
after 2001, when Pakistan made the crucial decision to join the US as an ally in
the war against Taliban militants,” according to Peshawar-based analyst
Rahimullah Yusufzai. He told IRIN: “Civilians have become caught up in this
conflict.”According to the South Asian Terrorism Portal maintained by the New
Delhi-based Institute for Conflict Management, 598 people were killed and 1,453
injured in various blasts up to 22 July. Previous years have also been violent,
with 1,508 killed in 2009, for example. The figures are based on news
reports.“It is vital for the future of our country that the militants are
defeated, Mian Iftikhar Hussain, minister of information for Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa
Province, who lost his own son in a 2010 attack, told IRIN.But many families of
victims are most concerned about their own future. Kulsoom Bibi, 50, who lost
her husband and eldest son in a 2009 blast at a Peshawar bazaar, now lives with
her sister in Rawalpindi, a city adjoining Islamabad. “We lost two
wage-earners in that blast. My son was only 22. My two teenage daughters and I
now sew, to keep my youngest son, Arsalan, 13, at school as I do not like to
depend on my brother-in-law, but we earn little and I worry my son may have to
drop out of school.” She said she had not heard of the BISP programme, but
commented: “What can such a small amount bring us anyway?”
Livelihoods
lost
Livelihoods
have been lost as a result of blast injuries. Hazar Gul, 60, who says he was
injured in both legs following a 2006 blast in Bajaur, now begs on a Rawalpindi
roadside. “I used to drive a wagon, but of course I can no longer do that. My
sight has also been affected by the explosion,” he told IRIN. Sometimes the
authorities “compensate” blast victims by distributing cheques among the
heirs of victims or those injured in such attacks. “In some cases
cheques handed over at ceremonies have proved very difficult to cash, as these
victims - especially women - lack documents like national ID cards… Also
[some] people have no bank accounts so cheques in their names are very hard to
cash,” a government official in Peshawar who asked not to be named, told IRIN,
adding: “I have seen families of those killed in bomb blasts suffer -
sometimes for years.
Psychological
problems
Twelve-year-old
Adnan Hussain, who lost nine family members in the same Peshawar blast, says he
is “very depressed” and feels today that there is no point in building
“any life for myself”. “Psychological problems are common among people
caught up in blasts, or those who have lost relatives in them, but sadly, mainly
because of their socio-economic backgrounds, few seek professional help,”
Rubina Shaheen, a psychologist at a private hospital in Rawalpindi, told IRIN. I
have seen families of those killed in bomb blasts suffer - sometimes for years.
There have also been concerns about delays by patients injured by blasts in
seeking treatment, leading to serious medical complications, or poor treatment
offered by hospitals in remote areas. Fawad Khan, health director for the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), told the media in 2010: “A
combination of medical facilities destroyed by militants, poverty and a lack of
education among FATA residents are why people are not getting the treatment they
need right away, resulting in amputations and deformities,” he said. The
situation remains largely unchanged today. Fruit vendor Muhammad Dawar Khan, 40,
was injured in both legs in a blast targeting a bus in Peshawar in June 2012.
“Doctors
at the time just bandaged both shins, but I have been feeling sharp pain
continuously and have now been told after X-rays that I have metal embedded in
one leg and will need surgery to remove it. I need to find a way to pay for this
surgery, and also make up for the time taken off work,” he said.
Why Kagame and Rwanda are under attack over DRC
by Joseph Rwagatare
Allafrica - July 31, 2012
"We
have finally got you' seems to be the gleeful cry of the foreign media and
rights groups. They are extremely happy that Rwanda, and President Paul Kagame
in particular, are accused of unspeakable crimes in the Democratic Republic of
the Congo (DRC). In some of the media, the president has even been convicted.
This "got-you-this-time" attitude and the unconcealed joy at the
supposed cutting of development support borders on the obscene They are even
happier that some countries have "cut" aid to Rwanda , or
"delayed, suspended, or withheld" it, or whatever term they prefer to
use, This does not come as a shock since they have shouted themselves hoarse
calling for such action. But as it turns out some of the claim of cutting aid is
false as in the case of the African Development Bank.
This
"got-you-this-time" attitude and the unconcealed joy at the supposed
cutting of development support borders on the obscene. But it is also perfectly
understandable and that explains why Paul Kagame and Rwanda have been singled
out for sustained attack.
To
be blunt, there are some uncomfortable truths about DRC and Africa that few want
to face. There are well-known problems in DRC which the media and rights groups
gloss over, and the UN and some countries which have caused them run away from.
At the same time none of these groups is comfortable with an African country
being successful and charting an independent course, or an African leader with
an independent mind. If Rwanda had been a failed state, as some hoped it would
be after 1994, it would enjoy the goodwill of many and there would be a rush to
help, even if that ended up entrenching the failed country status. NGOs would be
trampling all over the place, setting up this or that project and using the
hapless people to raise money in rich countries to finance their lavish
lifestyle and hopefully gratify their moral delusions masquerading as activism.
The
media would carry reports of famine and pictures of huge expanses of land laid
to waste and skeletons of starving children. They would run stories of huge
amounts of aid money stolen by government officials and stashed away in Swiss
bank vaults. Stories of conflict and turmoil, and citizens tearing each other
apart would abound. That doomsday story so beloved of the foreign media is not
happening in Rwanda. Instead, you have reports of food self-sufficiency and
surplus for export (incidentally, most of it to the resource-rich DRC). You read
stories of more than a million people lifted out of poverty in the space of five
years. You learn the country's economy has been growing at an average of eight
percent per year for the last ten years. You are informed of zero tolerance to
corruption and holding everyone to account. All boring stuff - not good copy for
the media hungry for its staple of misery, strife and scandal from Africa; not
good enough for the army of NGOs seeking the lost Garden of Eden in Africa or to
satisfy some moral fantasy. Western politicians, inept UN staff and incompetent
Congolese government officials running away from the responsibility of messing
up countries like DRC, find willing accomplices in the media and do-gooders.
The
Rwanda of today does not fit the chosen image of an African country. It is not
weak or failing. It is not your typical example of a supplicant - down on its
knees, holding out the bowl and saying: "Please, help". And so, this
country that refuses to behave to type and do the reasonable thing of paying
homage to the mighty of this world must be cut to size. It must be punished for
the arrogance to refuse to fit into the narrative crafted for it by others. And
what better way to do that than humiliate its leaders and citizens by reminding
them that they depend on the largesse of others for existence. So aid to the
upstart nation must be cut and the appropriate lessons learnt.
And
then you wonder: why is aid given in the first place? The naive among us have
always thought it was genuinely meant to raise the less fortunate of our earth
to a reasonable standard of life. The more practical have always known it for
what it is - a tool to control the behaviour of recipients so that they remain
docile and toe the line.
Just
like his country, President Kagame does not fit the media definition of an
African leader. He does not, or permit anyone, to plunder his country. He cares
about all its citizens and works for their prosperity. He has no luxurious
villas on the Riviera or on some paradise island. The man is plain-spoken, not
given to expansive or colourful rhetoric. Actually, the president is a regular
guy who puts in a normal day's shift like his fellow countrymen and retires to
his home to enjoy a normal family life. This, too, is not exciting to the media
used to villains and scoundrels that they often create to suit the script they
write for us. To them, the clean image, the passion and urgency to move the
country forward, and insistence that Rwandans must do their bit to earn their
livelihood and keep their dignity, cannot be allowed to stand. And it must
surely hide other terrible traits. And yes, he is an autocrat and war criminal,
who, like his country, must be punished.
And
so, with a pail of mud and brush in hand, they proceed to paint him as a villain
and write a script in which he acts the part. The truth, however, is different
and the painters and scriptwriters know it but will not admit it. The truth is
that President Kagame has been urging Rwandans to be who they are and strive to
be the best they can be. That means Rwandans defining themselves and rejecting
definition by others. With self-definition also comes decisions about what is
best for Rwandans. That, too, will not come from outside. He has also said many
times that the story of Rwanda, its national interests and aspirations of its
people can best be told by Rwandans, and as such, they cannot leave the
narrative of their country's progress to others to tell. The president has made
self-reliance, respect for sovereign decisions and mutual respect central to
relations with others, including development partners.
The
independence that President Kagame urges and the refusal to bow and scrape
before anyone threatens the continued control of our countries. It also hurts
the interests of some people - mainly the so-called Rwanda (Africa) experts in
the media, academia, governments and NGOs who find their presumed expertise
irrelevant and whose livelihoods are therefore challenged.
And
so, the mudslinging begins, a web of lies is woven and made into a narrative
whose aim is to stop Paul Kagame from propagating "dangerous" ideas of
liberty and development. He must be stopped at all costs lest his example
becomes contagious. The price to stop him and Rwanda's forward movement are the
millions of lives in DRC.
Buddhists ban on vasectomy and tubectomy
AsiaNews - Colombo - July 31, 2012
An
organization of Buddhist monks believed that the population is "at
risk" because of family planning programs promoted by the government. No
mention of minorities in the country. Buddhists account for 70% of the state
population.
The
Bodubalasena, an organization of Buddhist monks, is calling on the government of
Sri Lanka to ban vasectomies and tubectomies "to increase the Buddhist
population." According to the association in fact, the national laws do not
protect or safeguard the rights and identity of Buddhists, but campaigns
promoting family planning in exchange for money. Yet, Sri Lanka has a total
population of over 20.2 million people, of which 70% are Buddhist.
The
Bodubalasena prohibition of male and female sterilization came during the
group's first national conference, held last July 28 at the Bandaranayake
Memorial International Conference Hall (Bmich). Besides this issue, the
association has addressed other questions, mostly related to proposals in the
field of education. However, they only concern the Buddhist community, secular
and religious.
Several
times the Buddhist community in Sri Lanka has been shown to have "two
souls": on the one hand, there are those who seek dialogue and the
encounter with the Christian and Muslim minorities in the country, on the other,
there are many who want to "preserve" a position of greater power and
strength within society, given the fact that they are the religious majority.
Thus, the country is no stranger to incidents of discrimination - sometimes
resulting in reprisals and violence- by radical Buddhist groups and parties.
However,
this trend is associated with a problem of ethnic and cultural nature, which
contrasts with the poorer Tamil population (12.6%), concentrated in the
northeast of the island, the Sinhalese (74%), richer and widespread in the rest
of the State. (MMP)
Sudanese struggle to ignite their own uprising
by Sarah El Deeb
Thebangladeshtoday
- July 30, 2012
"We
have more reasons than any other Arab country for an uprising."
I
think my country Sudan has really hit rock bottom." Those were the last
public words uttered by Usamah Mohamad, a 32-year-old Sudanese Web
developer-turned-citizen journalist, in a video announcing he would join
protests against the government.
Mohamad,
popular under his Twitter handle "simsimt," was arrested the same day
his video was aired. For the next month, his family had no idea where he was.
Finally they learned he was in Khartoum's high security prison and were allowed
to visit him last week.
He
was skinnier and darker, a sign he had been left to bake in the scorching
Khartoum sun, people close to his case say. The family itself is saying nothing.
Mohamad
and hundreds of others - no less than 2,000, activists say - have been detained
the past month in a campaign unleashed by the Sudanese government. The crackdown
aims to crush a new attempt to launch a protest movement calling for the ouster
of Omar Bashir, inspired by the Middle East's uprisings that toppled the leaders
of Sudan's neighbors Egypt and Libya as well as Tunisia and Yemen.
Anti-government
activists see Bashir's 23-year-old regime as the ripest in the region to fall.
He has been weakened by the loss of oil-rich South Sudan, which became
independent last year after two decades of Africa's bloodiest civil war. His
regime has had to impose painful economic austerity measures to make up for the
loss of revenues from the south's oil, sending inflation up to nearly 40 percent
this month. The years-old rebellion in the western Darfur region continues to
bleed the country. Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court for
alleged war crimes in that region.
"We
have more reasons than any other Arab country for an uprising," said
Siddique Tawer, of an opposition umbrella group. "No other country was
split. Sudan was. No other country has a civil war ongoing in Darfur and
(fighting along the border with the South)."
"These
are enough reasons to topple a regime, aside from the corruption, oppression and
the rising cost of living," he said. "The continuation of this regime
is dangerous for the rest of the Sudan."
But
those troubles could also prolong the life of Bashir's regime. Bashir has showed
a survivor's talent for using external threats to keep key parts of the public
behind him. He is backed by a security machine and a network of interests built
on religious ideology, economic ties and tribal politics.
At
an inauguration of a factory in central Sudan on July 11, Bashir ridiculed
prospects for an uprising.
"They
talk of an Arab Spring. Let me tell them that in Sudan we have a hot summer, a
burning hot summer that burns its enemies," Bashir said, waving his cane
threateningly. So far, his prediction has borne true. Many are wary of new
turmoil after the long civil war and are bracing for a worsening economy.
Sudanese also remember how unrest against Bashir's predecessors led to military
coups, bringing Sudanese "back to square one," he said.
Sudanese
and the region worry of further fragmentation, with separatist movements not
only in Darfur but also in the east and in the south.
"What
remains of Sudan may not hold as one bloc and may become so unstable it reflects
on neighboring countries," including South Sudan, said Haj Ali. As a
result, regional powers - and the United States, he said - may prefer "to
deal with the regime in its current condition and not be embroiled in further
crises."
Khartoum
came close to war with South Sudan early this year. With the two sides in
torturous negotiations over oil sharing and borders, Bashir's regime can drum up
public support with anti-South rhetoric. Sudan's crushing economic crisis has
given youth groups a tool to galvanize the public behind their protest movement.
After
years of a boom fueled by southern oil, Sudan has reeled since the south's
independence. The crisis is threatening to worsen under austerity measures
recommended by the International Monetary Fund to deal with shrinking resources.
Inflation
is expected to rise further, electricity bills are going up, and consumer groups
are urging a boycott of meat and poultry because of rocketing prices. The
currency lost nearly half its value the past year, reaching 4.4 pounds to the
dollar officially and six on the black market, according to media reports.
The
youth groups, some of them working since 2009, put together a movement through
social media and university activism, linking with disgruntled communities of
Darfuris and others who live in Khartoum.
On
June 16, protests erupted. Female students marched in Khartoum University, were
joined by male students, and together they moved into the streets of the
capital. Over the next six days, protests broke out at universities in Khartoum
and other cities. On the Friday of that week, the strongest day of protests,
regular citizens in Khartoum joined, coming out from mosques in marches that
numbered several thousand. "The people demand the downfall of the
regime," some chanted, a refrain heard in other Arab uprisings.
Throughout
the week, police struck back with tear gas and rubber bullets and - in at least
one case - live ammunition, according to the London-based Sudanese rights group
the African Center for Justice and Peace Studies. Several students were
seriously injured. Student militias helped security agents in seizing
protesters, according to ACJPS. Finally, Khartoum University's vacation was
moved up to prevent more protests.
The
movement planned nationwide protests on June 30, coinciding with regime
celebrations for the anniversary of al-Bashir's coming to power. Under a
security clampdown, protesters managed only a small turnout. But with so many
troops in the streets, anniversary parades were not held.
Mohamad,
the Web developer, was seized at the Friday protest as he tweeted about arrests
by agents of the notorious National Security Services in Khartoum's Burri
district.
But
friends say he may have been targeted because of his video aired the same day on
Al-Jazeera English TV. "After 23 years of oppression and injustice, poverty
and crime that are all committed under the current regime, change now is an
inevitable must," he said in the video.
His
detention without charge, while others have been freed, shows how the regime
sees information about the protests as the biggest threat, said a friend of
Mohammed who was held twice in custody, including once for 11 hours without
water.
"He
is detained for a month, a treatment reserved usually for a ringleader,"
the friend said.
Activists
report arbitrary arrests of protesters and bloggers and their families in the
middle of the night, beatings and humiliation in detention. Two Egyptian female
journalists reporting for foreign media amid the unrest were deported.
Some
detainees were forced to call fellow activists to arrange meetings that were
really sting operations to arrest them. Interrogators threatened to release
pictures of women activists wearing revealing clothes to scandalize them in
Sudan's conservative society.
One
student told ACJPS that an officer threatened to snap his neck while another
scraped off his eyebrows, moustache and hair with a blade. "Now we've
marked you and if we catch you again protesting we will cut other parts of your
body," they told him.
Two
activists face serious criminal charges including inciting violence against the
regime. One of them, Rudwan Dawoud, who is married to an American and holds US
residency, was labeled a spy and could face the death sentence.
Nagui
Moussa - a 26-year old activist from the protest group Girifna, or "We are
fed up" - left to Cairo after being detained twice, deciding he was of more
use outside spreading information about the protests. He says protests may have
waned - because of both the crackdown and the fasting month of Ramadan - but
"people have changed. Why? Because they are seeing the continuous lies of
the regime."
Protests
in Khartoum make those in the core of Sudan realize that "the injustice is
all over, in the center as in the periphery."
"People
will see that the one who strikes and tortures in the south, or in Darfur, is
the same as the one who strikes and tortures in the north," he said.
Mired
in the Nuba Mountains and Beyond by Ilona Eveleens
Allafrica - July 27, 2012
A
civil war continues to rage in Sudan's Nuba Mountains. Life there is fraught
with violence and, making daily survival even harder, a rainy season that keeps
aid from reaching the area. Just a few kilometres across the border in South
Sudan, refugee camps have sprung up. Yet their appalling circumstances are
causing aid organizations to sound alarm bells, signalling that those who flee
are not necessarily finding refuge. Ali Mrjan, his wife and three children
plough silently through the deep, sticky mud. They don't bother stopping to
watch how one car struggles to pull another four-wheel drive out of the black
sludge.
"We
want to get to Yida. There is food in that camp. We have been walking for six
days and tomorrow we should arrive," says Mrjan. The children are
lethargic. The family has not had a decent meal since leaving their small hamlet
close to Kauda, a strategic town in Sudan's Nuba Mountains that has been in the
hands of the rebel movement SPLA-North (SPLA-N) since the 1990s.
The
Nuba Mountains are more or less encircled by the armed forces of Sudan (SAF).
There is no trade with the rest of Sudan. Every day some 500 people arrive at
Yida camp alone, just across the border in South Sudan. Yet arrival there is no
guarantee for relief. There is a lack of sanitation and clean water. Children
are malnourished. Malaria is rampant because of the rainy season. In the stores
along the Yida airstrip, food is piled up, but their stock hardly grows because
this only means of reaching the camp is often closed - it is too muddy for
planes to land.
Rain
as a weapon
Access
to South Sudan is very limited. For a quarter of the year, roads are simply
impassable due to heavy rains. In fact, some believe the rainy season is being
used by the SPLA-N to start an offensive against the SAF. The rainy season is
always a lean time in the Nuba Mountains. Produce can only be harvested in
September and October. That means the population must rely on their food stores.
The war, however, hindered last year's planting season and the stores here are
already empty.
"I
planted on my land, but the rains were late," explains Mrjan. "By the
time it started to rain, the seeds were destroyed. I have no money to buy
others. Besides, it's very hard to find seeds in the Nuba Mountains." Mrjan
says he could not find any other form of income.
Aid
late to come
Khartoum
only recently gave aid organizations permission to offer help in rebel-held
territory. But the Sudanese government threw many obstacles in the way. The mud
notwithstanding, it remains difficult for official help to reach the Nuba
Mountains and the Blue Nile state. Meanwhile, fighting and food insecurity drive
more and more people into the camps. "The aid organizations are too
late," says Mrjan, while he and his family take a rest, drinking water from
a nearby stream. "They knew the roads would become impassable. They knew
there would be a lack of food. Why did they not make seeds more available
sooner?" In the last months, Father Francis and other priests from the
towns of Kauda and Gidel have made up to three trips a week from Yida to the
Nuba Mountains, delivering food and other provisions. Lately, though, Francis
has been sitting around in a tent in Yida. He is waiting for a mechanic to fix
the starter motor of an ancient truck that he plans to use to bring more seeds
and medicine."It's still not enough. I need to get in there again and
soon," the parish priest of Gidel sighs. "But look at the sky. There
is so much more rain coming. And I need at least three dry days before I can
Ambivalent about needle exchanges
Irinnews - Bangkok - July 31, 2012
Needle
exchanges for injecting drug users and the decriminalization of people who use
drugs are the most effective ways of preventing HIV and hepatitis C infections
in Thailand, say experts.
“When
users do not have access to sterile injecting equipment they will share needles,
[and] that will lead to HIV transmission as well as to hepatitis C,” said
Pascal Tanguay, programme director in the Thailand office of the international
NGO, Population Services International (PSI).
Providing
free clean needles and syringes has proven to be the safest and most effective
way to prevent new infections among injecting drug users (IDUs). But the Council
of State, Thailand’s central legal advisory body, has interpreted any needle
distribution programme as promoting drug use, Petsri Siriniran, Director of the
National AIDS Management Centre in the Public Health Ministry’s Department of
Disease Control, told IRIN.
Nevertheless,
the ministry is collaborating on a pilot project, run by PSI since 2009, in
which counselling and sterile syringes are provided through drop-in centres and
outreach services in 19 of Thailand’s 76 provinces. PSI has partnered with
various local NGOs and support groups for people living with HIV to distribute
clean needles to the country’s estimated 40,000 IDUs, 20 percent of whom share
needles, according to 2010 government figures.
The
Urban Health Research Initiative of the British Columbia Centre for Excellence
in HIV/AIDS and the local Thai AIDS Treatment Action Group released a survey of
468 injecting drug users from a community in Bangkok, the capital, in 2012.
The
study found that 30 percent of participants borrowed needles from other drug
users, largely because there was nowhere to buy new ones or because pharmacies
refused to sell them syringes.
A
2011 World Bank review of HIV prevention among IDUs in Thailand indicated that
needle exchange programmes could be one of the key factors in decreasing HIV
infections among them.
HIV
prevalence among Thai IDUs dropped from 49 percent in 2008-2009 to 22 percent
the following year. However, this is still among the highest in the Southeast
Asia region, according to the Global AIDS Response progress report by the UN
Joint HIV/AIDS Programme (UNAIDS).
Anne
Bergenstrom, regional adviser on HIV/AIDS at the UN Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC), questions the apparent drop. “Some of this reduction may be due to
deaths in this population. There is no recent national survey on drugs, so we do
not know how many initiate drugs and how many are HIV positive,” she said.
In Bangkok, Sak Aim Kien, 47, said, “When I am with friends and I have money,
I still inject heroin, although I try hard to quit.” He has attended
government drug rehabilitation programmes for the past eight years with
faltering success. “My family does not know about my addiction and I tell my
children I have a lung disease to hide it.”
Drug
user drop-in centre Another man at the same local drop-in centre who went by the
name of Aun, 37, went from injecting heroin to midazolam - a legally available
psychotropic drug that alters brain function by affecting the central nervous
system - after completing a methadone treatment programme five years ago.
Daily
doses of methadone, a pain reliever, have been shown to help wean injecting drug
users off heroin by blocking drug-induced euphoria and blunting their withdrawal
symptoms, but in some cases, users have simply substituted one addiction for
another.
Government
“ambivalence”
Since
2009, PSI has distributed more than 300,000 needles and syringes, reaching up to
8,000 drug users, but workers say they operate on the margins of the law. “We
currently run the only needle and syringe distribution project in Thailand, but
the Thai government refuses to implement needle and syringes distribution,
proclaiming falsely that such projects would encourage drug use,” said
Tanguay. “Sometimes the police are waiting outside our premises, arresting
people who come here,” Piyabutr Nakaphiw, the manager of O-Zone, a drop-in
centre for drug users in Bangkok, told IRIN. The centre employs drug users as
outreach workers to distribute clean needles to other users in their
communities. “They stop our outreach community workers, and if they are tested
positive for drugs, the police either ask for money or arrest them,” said
Nakaphiw. UNODC’s Bergenstrom noted that “The government always had an
ambivalent attitude towards the needle exchange. If we try to achieve HIV
reduction, then coverage to needle exchange, access to rehabilitation programmes
and to counselling services should be increased.” The 2012-2016 national AIDS
strategy calls for a review and amendment of current legislation that prohibits
needle exchange and criminalizes drug users. A past effort to change the
relevant laws failed. Although the Drug Addict Rehabilitation Act passed
in 2002 promotes the treatment of people who use drugs as patients, under the
1979 Narcotics Act drug addicts can still be arrested. “It will be virtually
impossible to halt HIV transmission as long as the national legal and policy
framework around drug issues focuses on punishment and deterrence at the expense
of the health and human rights of citizens,” said Tanguay.
Hepatitis
C infection is another concern. A recent study published by the UK medical
journal, The Lancet, reported that almost 90 percent of IDUs in Thailand
are living with hepatitis C, which is transmitted through needle sharing, and
can lead to liver failure and cancer.
Tanguay
said although needle exchange programmes alone will not halt the spread of HIV
and hepatitis C, it can be a major part of the solution if combined with the
decriminalization of drugs and drug users.
Who sheds tears for Tibet?
Asianews
Magazine - July 27/Aug 9, 2012
The
world has become attuned to the sufferings of Tibetans and does not even say
anything about the daylight murder of the old culture and heritage.
One
more monk burns himself at Lhasa. People have lost the count. Yet such fiery
protests take place throughout Tibet, almost every other day. This is the way
the monks are registering their defiance to Chinese communist culture. Yet
Beijing is relentless in imposing its way of life on them, seen clinging to
their Buddhist heritage fiercely. Self-immolation is considered the highest type
of sacrifice in Buddhism, although their religious leader, the Dalai Lama, has
advised them strongly against such a practice. He has said in a press interview
that he understands their pain and feels guilty in criticising them. But if he
doesn’t, there would be innumerable monks taking their lives. Against this
backdrop, the world conscience remains dead. A few who protest in the West are
silenced by their governments forcibly. The almighty yuan has suppressed the
expression of truth beneath the mercantile considerations. The emerging China is
too powerful and too rich to be boycotted for the intangible value of religious
freedom and human rights. The preachy West has told the Dalai Lama explicitly
not to visit them because it realises which side of the bread is buttered.
The
government in India is too scared to support the Tibetans’ cause. Even when
its request to reopen its mission was rudely rejected, New Delhi did not even
voice its protest. The Dalai Lama has said many a time that India “can do
more” for his people but it prefers to keep its distance from them because of
Beijing’s sensitivity. Yet the Tibetans have not given up the fight.
Camp
Hale at Colorado in the US was a long way from Tibet. What joined the two was
the training of some 2,000 Tibetan warriors in the guerilla warfare to fight the
People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China. The warriors failed to make any
headway. Yet they have kept the powerful army on its pins all the time.
Unfortunately, Beijing sees the hand of New Delhi behind Tibet’s independence
struggle. China is more convinced about this after Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna
told it recently that Tibet was like Kashmir, “our core problem”.The
Tibetans, however, continue to harbour grievance against India for having
accepted China’s suzerainty over Tibet after the British left India in 1947.
Their complaint is that New Delhi never consulted them. The Dalai Lama, who took
refuge in India in 1954 when he could not see the Communist shoes trampling upon
the spiritual and traditional ways of his people, too believes that since New
Delhi had no locus stand in Tibet, it had no right to accept China’s
suzerainty without consulting his people. Suzerainty does not mean independence.
It is government’s political control over a dependent state. What New Delhi
transferred to China is over lordship, not sovereignty. Yet it is apparent that
for the sake of India’s good relations with China, the Dalai Lama who became
77 this week, has to face hard living conditions. Along with his people, he has
been sent to stay rooted at Dharamshala, a small hill station in Himachal
Pradesh. And the Tibetans have been warned many a time against having any
contact with the outside world without New Delhi’s prior permission. Even
local people have been told not to interact with them.
The
Dalai Lama too has restrictions on his movement and even pronouncements. Even
otherwise, he speaks rarely. In an interview, he said, “meaningful autonomy is
the only realistic solution”. He made the same offer some time ago, but
Beijing rejected it. This time too he doesn’t expect China to change. The
Dalai Lama has noted that even during the 1962 war of India against China,
Jawaharlal Nehru did not utter a word about Tibet. Nor did he draw the world’s
attention to the ethnic cleansing going on in Tibet at that time. On certain
occasions, the Dalai Lama has felt “suffocated” and has raised protest over
New Delhi’s attitude.
No
successor to Nehru, including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, has been any
different even when Beijing is hauling thousands of Chinese to Tibet to settle
them there so as to change the ethnic complexion of Tibet.A lonely Dalai Lama
goes on pointing out that Beijing is sedulously destroying the centuries old
culture of Buddhists in Tibet. On the other hand, the world has become attuned
to the sufferings of Tibetans and does not even say anything about the daylight
murder of the old culture and heritage. The purpose of Beijing is to squeeze out
even the last bit of religious practices and rites which the Tibetans still
defiantly follow. Washington may be willing to appeal to the world conscience to
help save the Tibetan culture. But how far it is willing to jeopardise the trade
and economic ties with China is the question. After all, President Barrack Obama
kept the Dalai Lama waiting to placate Beijing. Even when he met him, Obama
looked like going over an exercise.
Strong
Chinese economy gives more comfort to US citizens than a few drops of tears that
the irking conscience of some may shed. When Beijing lays its claim on Arunachal
Pradesh and when the visa for people of Jammu and Kashmir is given on a separate
paper, although stapled to the passport, New Delhi gives in more than it
imagines. It should introspect whether it was correct in accepting China’s
suzerainty over Tibet when Beijing is not prepared to take into account the
sensitivities of either Tibet or India. Tibet today is like an occupied
territory, without the people there having any say in governance. Lhasa is
directly under Beijing’s control. Unfortunately, the Dalai Lama is thinking of
retiring when he is needed the most. He should, in fact, go around the world and
awaken its conscience to garner support against China’s brutalities. Beijing
must let the Tibetans live the way they want to because that alone gives them
their entity.
Catholic dissident’s mother sets herself on
fire
AsiaNews - Hanoi - July 31, 2012
Anger and bewilderment of Vietnamese
Dang
Thi Kim Lieng's self-immolation in front of government offices in the southern
province of Bac Lieu. Her daughter Maria Ta Phong Tan, a former policewoman
converted to Christianity, is in jail awaiting trial. She faces up to 20 years
in prison for propaganda against the state. Human rights activists and bloggers:
specious accusations.
The
Vietnamese Catholic community is in shock over the death of Dang Thi Kim Lieng,
mother of Mary Ta Phong Tan (pictured), a famous dissident in jail awaiting
trial who faces up to 20 years in prison. The woman set herself on fire in front
of government offices in the southern province of Bac Lieu, to protest against
abuses by the prison authorities who hold her daughter, depriving her of basic
rights. The mother died from severe wounds inflicted by the flames sparking the
reaction of many bloggers in the country, who accuse the Communist Party and
government leaders of a policy of repression and of systematically violating the
freedom of religion and thought, with trumped-up charges including
"spreading propaganda against the state."
Without
saying a word to family and friends, Dang Thi Kim Lieng went to the government
offices in the province of Bac Lieu and self-immolated. Activists and lawyers
who fight for human rights in Vietnam say that the woman died during her
transport to the hospital in Ho Chi Minh City. However, neither police nor the
official authorities have commented on the case or confirmed the event. Some
relatives report that Dang recently appeared very concerned about the fate of
her daughter Maria Ta Phong Tan, locked in a prison in the former Saigon, whom
she has not seen since last September, the date of her arrest. The police
maintain she is guilty of "subversive activities" and of having
written "slander" published online, discrediting the Hanoi government
and the Communist Party.
The
hearing in court against Mary Tan, 44, should begin on 7 August and there is a
very real possibility she will be sentenced to decades in prison. She is a
former police officer well known in Vietnam, because she denounced abuses and
distortions of the prison system online. Her decision to convert to Catholicism
also weighs against her, after an adolescence and childhood characterized by
continuous "brainwashing" in Communist ideology. However, her
encounter with a lawyer and activist for human rights sparked her desire to
rediscover the faith that, over time, led her to baptism.
The
Vietnamese government has implemented tight control over religious activities,
and Catholics are often victims of violence and abuse, both individuals and
entire communities. Among the many examples are the Montagnards in the Central
Highlands and the Redemptorist Fathers, in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, whose
pastoral commitment is choked with systematic regularity. However, this violence
did not prevent them from playing a key role in the spread of Catholicism and
the teachings of the Church, especially among the poor and the abandoned.